Layback and inline seatposts

Giraffoto
Giraffoto Posts: 2,078
edited June 2015 in MTB general
I don't know what the advantages and disadvantages of these might be - when is it better to be 10 - 20mm further back, and when is it better to be further forward?
Specialized Roubaix Elite 2015
XM-057 rigid 29er

Comments

  • cooldad
    cooldad Posts: 32,599
    The only use is to get the saddle where you need it. There are no inherrent advantages as such, although an inline post make be stiffer/stronger.
    I don't do smileys.

    There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

    London Calling on Facebook

    Parktools
  • paul.skibum
    paul.skibum Posts: 4,068
    If a bike is specced with an inline, a layback post might give more room in the cockpit but it might screw up the pedalling and handling by putting you too far back to be efficient pedalling and unweighting the front wheel a lot on steep climbs.

    An inline put on a bike with a layback post will shorten the cockpit and shift you forward for climbing and pedalling and may make it easier when off the seat to get weight back by putting the seat out your way a little.

    if messing with your cockpit and available space is something you are thinking its worth changing possibly but otherwise I'd stick with what is on there.
    Closet jockey wheel pimp whore.
  • The Rookie
    The Rookie Posts: 27,812
    The other aspect is that with a layback post you effectively have a longer bike when sitting than when standing on the pedals as the BB to front distance doesnt change when the saddle moves back (going from an inline post), so you can use that effect to make a shorter trail HT into a longer XC bike when sitting (Slighlt exageraion, but I hope you see what I mean).
    Currently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.