which aluminium frame? merida reacto, scultura, caad10

silver2789
silver2789 Posts: 36
edited January 2015 in Road buying advice
I'm looking for a new bike (on the bike to work scheme) and have decided to go for an aluminium frame thinking it will last a lot longer than a low end carbon frame with the abuse ill be putting it through. I have narrowed it down to these;

Merida scultura 400
Merida reacto 400
Cannondale CAAD10

all come equipped with 105 and are pretty much the same price, I know the caad get great reviews but don't hear much of the merida, unfortunately I can't test ride any of these so looking for anybody whos got any experience with these who can offer some advice. cheers
it would be used for pretty much everything from commutes to sportives so longevity/ durability is key

Comments

  • I would have the CAAD 10, but they are £1300 and over the bike to work limit?
  • alex222
    alex222 Posts: 598
    I would have the CAAD 10, but they are £1300 and over the bike to work limit?
    You can top up the difference between the 1k on the bike to work and the price of the bike.
  • IShaggy
    IShaggy Posts: 301
    Carbon is much tougher than alluminium. Expect 5 to 10 good years from an alluminium frame and potentially a lifetime from carbon. But you should get more bang for your bucks with an alluminium frame. Think hot hatch rather than sports car.
  • IShaggy wrote:
    Carbon is much tougher than alluminium. Expect 5 to 10 good years from an alluminium frame and potentially a lifetime from carbon. But you should get more bang for your bucks with an alluminium frame. Think hot hatch rather than sports car.

    What do you base that assumption on???? And which is it 5 or 10 years :roll:
    I've been using my alu commuter since 1998 and the frame is still going strong, allbeit with occasional component upgrades.

    Now to the question that was originally asked a good Alu bike recomendation, what about the Canyon endurence alu bike, everyone's talking about the carbon endurence from them but few seem to mention that it's also offerd in alloy. :idea:
  • cubedean
    cubedean Posts: 670
    Alex222 wrote:
    I would have the CAAD 10, but they are £1300 and over the bike to work limit?
    You can top up the difference between the 1k on the bike to work and the price of the bike.

    Double check this with both the shop and your company. Most companies & shops will not do that as it creates conflict of ownership during the hire period.

    My choice would be the Caad10
  • alex222
    alex222 Posts: 598
    cubedean wrote:
    Alex222 wrote:
    I would have the CAAD 10, but they are £1300 and over the bike to work limit?
    You can top up the difference between the 1k on the bike to work and the price of the bike.

    Double check this with both the shop and your company. Most companies & shops will not do that as it creates conflict of ownership during the hire period.

    My choice would be the Caad10
    If you are going through Bike2Work scheme provider they have no problem with it. All the shops I spoke to and the online retailers were happy for the top up. There is the issue that you don't officially own the bike so there is a risk there. So your call as to whether it's worth it or not
  • holiver
    holiver Posts: 729
    I really like the look of the Scultura. It probably has the most upright geometry of the 3, but by no means has a high front end.

    I'd examine the geometries against what you are looking for before making a decision.
  • all the companies I spoke to say they have no problem going over the 1k limit as long as I pay the difference up front, i do like the look of the canyons but I'm limited by the scheme as to where i can get it from, the main reason I'm looking at an ali bike is that ive read a few articles which say its better to go high end ali rather than low end carbon. I don't think ive seen a bad word toward the cannondale so was swaying more to the caad10 but i do like the look of the meridas
  • jordan_217
    jordan_217 Posts: 2,580
    I own carbon, Alu, steel and Ti bikes, nothing Ive experienced so far leads me to believe one material is going to die before another. I suppose it all depends on wether or not you'll wave at other cyclists, wear a helmet or fit 23 or 25mm tyres? E.g. It doesnt actually matter!

    Oh, get the CAAD10 and phone Westbrooks, they will usually be up for some haggling .
    “Training is like fighting with a gorilla. You don’t stop when you’re tired. You stop when the gorilla is tired.”
  • IShaggy
    IShaggy Posts: 301
    What do you base that assumption on???? And which is it 5 or 10 years :roll:

    I base the assumption on researching the subject. Try Googling - you may or may not learn something. As for whether it's 5 or 10 years. Have you considered that it may depend on the designation of the alluminium - alloying elements used and temper. And on how the frame is constricted - thickness of tubes, double versus single butted, And weight and type of rider. And of course, how often the frame is ridden.
  • letap73
    letap73 Posts: 1,608
    silver2789 wrote:
    all the companies I spoke to say they have no problem going over the 1k limit as long as I pay the difference up front, i do like the look of the canyons but I'm limited by the scheme as to where i can get it from, the main reason I'm looking at an ali bike is that ive read a few articles which say its better to go high end ali rather than low end carbon. I don't think ive seen a bad word toward the cannondale so was swaying more to the caad10 but i do like the look of the meridas

    Those articles are probably few years old - carbon frame models have been super ceded a number of times by certain companies. A number of years ago, Cannondale sold a himod supersix frame:

    http://roadcyclinguk.com/gear/cannondal ... lPaBbLp.97

    This frame would be super ceded by this: (note the difference in price)

    http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/m7b0s6p547 ... 105-6-2014