Saddle Height article, What do you think?
comsense
Posts: 245
Came across an article "on another site" re estimating saddle height.
It reckons that you get your cycling inseam in the usual manner, then subtract 10 cm. I personally never heard of this and wondered if any of you have? If you haven't would you have a go and then check the figure against your current saddle height just for curiosity?
Mine came out 7mm higher than I have ever had it. I raised it this morning before a hilly ride. Have to say it felt good and I will leave at that unless something crops up.
It reckons that you get your cycling inseam in the usual manner, then subtract 10 cm. I personally never heard of this and wondered if any of you have? If you haven't would you have a go and then check the figure against your current saddle height just for curiosity?
Mine came out 7mm higher than I have ever had it. I raised it this morning before a hilly ride. Have to say it felt good and I will leave at that unless something crops up.
0
Comments
-
Saddle height formulas are usually just a basic guideline and can vary a bit between methods. If it feels good you probably have it right.0
-
crankycrank wrote:Saddle height formulas are usually just a basic guideline and can vary a bit between methods. If it feels good you probably have it right.
Yeah, I'm around long enough to understand that, thanks. I guess I was surprised that it was 7mm out from where I was at - I'd consider 7mm a big enough difference. I just wondered how close other people found it.0 -
I went for a bike fit and he lowered by saddle by 22mm. Which was massive and it felt really weird to ride.
I kept with it for about a month and I was getting ever worse back pain so I put it up by about 10mm which much improved things.0 -
It predicted my saddle height to be about 3 cms higher than it is, but I do tend towards riding with a flat footed style, and I'm not a giant among men. My saddle height does go up and down by a cm or so, it's lower when I've been riding cyclocross or mountain biking.0
-
I've never stuck to a formula for saddle height. I set the height then go for a ride and may have to adjust it a few times before I get it right. Any of these formula should only be a guide I would say, surely nobody takes them as hard and fast rules.0
-
comsense wrote:Came across an article "on another site" re estimating saddle height.
It reckons that you get your cycling inseam in the usual manner, then subtract 10 cm. I personally never heard of this and wondered if any of you have? If you haven't would you have a go and then check the figure against your current saddle height just for curiosity?
Mine came out 7mm higher than I have ever had it. I raised it this morning before a hilly ride. Have to say it felt good and I will leave at that unless something crops up.
Surely it's 10mm?0 -
Veronese68 wrote:I've never stuck to a formula for saddle height. I set the height then go for a ride and may have to adjust it a few times before I get it right. Any of these formula should only be a guide I would say, surely nobody takes them as hard and fast rules.
I agree, I have mentioned above that I understand that. My question was just curiosity to see whether peoples actual heights were close to the one from this method. If I am being honest, I suspect the majority's current height will be lower.0 -
ibbo68 wrote:comsense wrote:Came across an article "on another site" re estimating saddle height.
It reckons that you get your cycling inseam in the usual manner, then subtract 10 cm. I personally never heard of this and wondered if any of you have? If you haven't would you have a go and then check the figure against your current saddle height just for curiosity?
Mine came out 7mm higher than I have ever had it. I raised it this morning before a hilly ride. Have to say it felt good and I will leave at that unless something crops up.
Surely it's 10mm?
Not 10 cm of a saddle height difference!
The calculation is your inseam minus 10 cm = saddle height. Which in my case meant my saddle was 7mm too low.0 -
My inseam is 30inches-30"X1.09=32.7"
My saddle height is 32.7 inches-83cm
Inseam minus 10cm/4" is 26"X1.09=28.7
Using that method my saddle height becomes 28.7 inches-72.8cm....which is 4nches/10cm/100m difference!
Or am I missing something?0 -
ibbo68 wrote:My inseam is 30inches-30"X1.09=32.7"
My saddle height is 32.7 inches-83cm
Inseam minus 10cm/4" is 26"X1.09=28.7
Using that method my saddle height becomes 28.7 inches-72.8cm....which is 4nches/10cm/100m difference!
Or am I missing something?
If your saddle is higher than your inseam then how do you reach the pedal? Bear in mind the pedal is a further 175mm or so lower than the bottom bracket at straightest leg position.0 -
Well I never, 82.5 inseam, 72.5 between the saddle and BB. It's the devil at work!0
-
Ai_1 wrote:I think you're measuring something wrong!
If your saddle is higher than your inseam then how do you reach the pedal? Bear in mind the pedal is a further 175mm or so lower than the bottom bracket at straightest leg position.
The formula is Inseamx1.09=32.7 because inseam is crotch-ankle bone not crotch to floor.This is how I've always done it(inseam x1.07 on MTBs) and all my bikes(3) fit me perfectly!0 -
Most like this are a good starting point but people's proportions and flexibility vary.0
-
Kajjal wrote:Most like this are a good starting point but people's proportions and flexibility vary.
Hi, don't want to sound like a smart alec, but that is the 3rd or 4th time someone has made that point. And please do not think I'm being thick with this reply
I understand these calculations are ball park, starting points or whatever.
I am just curios if any of you do the calculation how close it resembles your actual saddle height.
Thanks!0 -
ibbo68 wrote:My inseam is 30inches-30"X1.09=32.7"
My saddle height is 32.7 inches-83cm
Inseam minus 10cm/4" is 26"X1.09=28.7
Using that method my saddle height becomes 28.7 inches-72.8cm....which is 4nches/10cm/100m difference!
Or am I missing something?
Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
ABCC Cycling Coach0 -
Well that works for me, my inseam is 85cm and top of saddle to centre of BB is 75cm.0
-
NapoleonD wrote:ibbo68 wrote:My inseam is 30inches-30"X1.09=32.7"
My saddle height is 32.7 inches-83cm
Inseam minus 10cm/4" is 26"X1.09=28.7
Using that method my saddle height becomes 28.7 inches-72.8cm....which is 4nches/10cm/100m difference!
Or am I missing something?
ibbo68 is using the 109% method - saddle to the pedal axle (not centre of bottom bracket).0 -
Seen that article as well and tried it on my old turbo trainer bike, only recently picked it up and so decided to try it.was 80cm inseam so set saddle to 70 cm...have to say it feels ok to me so gonna stick with it. :PLapierre Aircode 300
Merida0 -
intriguing..
I have never measured my inseam before, so just been and got the tape measure and measured from floor to gooch sans shoes and it was 89cm.
measured from centre of BB to top of saddle and its 79cms!
how about that then!My winter bike is exactly the same as my summer bike,,, but dirty...0 -
Pretty close. 88.5cm crotch to floor. 78cm centre BB to top of saddle. I use Speedplay with 4-bolt soles, so have a lower stack height than other pedal systems. Probably accounts for the other 0.5cm.0
-
That £150 bike fit looks like money down the drain0
-
the LeMond formula inseam x 0.883 will give you pretty much this minus 10cm figure - hardly breaking news, saves a calculator I suppose0
-
I was having terrible ITB problems until I lowered my saddle to the Lemond recommended height.
It's been fine since and I have done two pain free 100s in the last two weeks.Boardman Elite SLR 9.2S
Boardman FS Pro0 -
All the formulas as said are a guide line , the lemond method and the holmes method both give similar results but for me heel on pedal and the guide in Cobb cycling of .889 both give a result 1 mm out of where i have my saddle height .A result that could be accounted for by measuring error and the fact i put it a round number of 69 cm from BB .
http://www.cobbcycling.com/content/seat-instructionsFCN 3/5/90 -
It just about works for me.
Inseam is 32" which is 81.3 cm (crotch to floor, none of this ankle bone malarkey)
Which suggests a saddle height of 71.3 cm (again, top of saddle to centre of BB. I think the people who are confusing the boxer dog are measuring to / from somewhere else)
My preferred saddle height is 72 cm. This was initially determined during a bike fit when purchasing; I've tinkered with it a few times but keep returning to it as the most comfortable and effective (in terms of balancing use of quads and glutes)0 -
Inseam = 870 mm - 100 mm = 770mm. My saddle height is 753 mm by one fitter and 770 by another. I currently have it at 760mm maybe Ill try 770 again. Where is this info taken from?Pegoretti
Colnago
Cervelo
Campagnolo0