Anyone not wear glasses?
Comments
-
I didn't wear any today and this afternoon on the way home a truck going the other way kicked up a load of crap that all seemed to make a beeline for my eyes. Not very pleasant. So, I'll remember them tomorrow.0
-
The point is to provide an alternative view to the preceding nonsense which implies that one requires specialised safety equipment to use a bicycle, but you knew that...
Glasses may well make sense on occasion, but this gets extrapolated by the simples to mean that one shouldn't ever ride without, and that to do so will result in instant blindness.
See also helmets and gloves for further evidence of silliness.0 -
This forum needs more bigots. Preferably with a superiority complex."You really think you can burn off sugar with exercise?" downhill paul0
-
crikey wrote:The point is to provide an alternative view to the preceding nonsense which implies that one requires specialised safety equipment to use a bicycle, but you knew that...
Glasses may well make sense on occasion, but this gets extrapolated by the simples to mean that one shouldn't ever ride without, and that to do so will result in instant blindness.
See also helmets and gloves for further evidence of silliness.
The implications and extrapolations you condemn don't actually seem to exist. What are you talking about?0 -
Charlie Potatoes wrote:This forum needs more bigots. Preferably with a superiority complex.
It also could do with a 'like' button.- - - - - - - - - -
On Strava.{/url}0 -
crikey wrote:
Glasses may well make sense on occasion, but this gets extrapolated by the simples to mean that one shouldn't ever ride without, and that to do so will result in instant blindness.
See also helmets and gloves for further evidence of silliness.
What occasion do you think they make sense then?
My original post/question was pretty specific about the type of cycling I was talking about and feeling they were necessary for.
Do not think anyone gives a monkeys about anyone else wearing gloves either so not sure why you even mention those.
I certainly prefer wearing all three though. Along with padded bibshorts, base layer, various different technical jersey's, cycling specific socks/shoes etc. etc.
Do they all pi55 you off too?0 -
I always wear them. Get some with swappable lenses so you can use them at night. You only get one pair of eyes, a bit of gravel flicking up at 30mph will wreck that for you!
The most important thing is to keep the arms over the straps as well. I can't stress this enough
Someone was saying above about gloves, the one time I didn't wear mine recently I came off at about 40 km/h. Picking gravel out of your palm and bleeding all over your white bar tape is not fun! They aren't essential but the whole experience is more pleasurable with them.
Anyone telling you not to wear a helmet, well...
Edit: not sure why (The word that sounds like picking but starts with fl) is a dirty word?0 -
I am arms under straps. Have I been doing it all wrong?
Flicking can be a dirty word 8)0 -
As if to make a timely point, I was crossing the road on foot at lunchtime today - halfway across, a fly went in my eye and i had to dig it out with my finger. Was uncomfortable and distracting to say the least, all while I was in the middle of the road. If I had been going fast on a bike and taking a junction or something like that and also maybe unable to take my hand off the bars so easily to get it out, could have been nasty.
First time in 43 years that I can recall it hapenning while crossing the road, but that doesnt mean it will never happen, because it did!0 -
I honestly cannot believe that anyone would even dream of not wearing sunglasses at any time - how are you meant to look at girls without busted if you don't have dark lenses covering your eyes?Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
I wore some clear glasses yesterday ... it started drizzling ... after 6 miles I stopped and took them off so I could see where I was going ..0
-
Matthewfalle wrote:I honestly cannot believe that anyone would even dream of not wearing sunglasses at any time - how are you meant to look at girls without busted if you don't have dark lenses covering your eyes?
This times a million.
In seriousness I do normally wear mine, they don't have a particularly dark lense so are good as long as it's light. I take them off on big climbs sometimes. It doesn't really bother me not wearing them, except when I'm descending fast and my eyes start streaming. We do have a lot of midges around here sometimes, and I do get them hit my lenses fairly frequently, so I think they offer some safety benefit (for me).0 -
Carbonator wrote:I am arms under straps. Have I been doing it all wrong?
******* can be a dirty word 8)
And whilst we're there, rule #39 provides some eyewear clarification0 -
apreading wrote:Slowbike wrote:I wore some clear glasses yesterday ... it started drizzling ... after 6 miles I stopped and took them off so I could see where I was going ..
Would have been the opposite way around in the heavy rain today.
Nope - I was fine riding home from work in the rain ... no glasses ...
What do you use to keep the rain off them?0 -
Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.0
-
bobmcstuff wrote:Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.0
-
apreading wrote:Slowbike wrote:What do you use to keep the rain off them?
I dont, but its better than having the rain streaming into my eyes.
Eitherway visibility is reduced - I can blink to clear the rain from my eyes - doesn't clear it from the glasses - I'd rather blink and see some of the time ... or try that cap method ...0 -
The only time that glasses hinder visibility is if I'm riding someones wheel in pouring rain and they've got no mudguards so I'm getting hosed down all the time. if its just rain - it doesn't seem an issue. My Oakleys are meant to have a hydrophobic coating on though.0
-
Carbonator wrote:In particular on club/group rides, or anything other than solo riding.
The helmet debate is one thing, but I have never actually need one of those
I have had stuff hit (chip) my glasses and general face area loads of times though.
Do not understand how you could cycle without any glasses and leave you eyes open to damage.
I would find the wind annoying, let alone a stone.
Is it odd/silly not to wear glasses while cycling, or am I just being fleeced by the manufacturers again?
I don't. Mostly because I just don't like glasses. My wife wears sunglasses all the time and I've tried them but just can't get away with it, I find them really annoying, so the same applies when cycling.0 -
bobmcstuff wrote:Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.
I find that while definately better with a cap, enough rain will eventually land on the lenses to make visibility worse than without...amplify a 100 times if they start steaming up too.
In the daytime it's not so bad but at night in the rain, they come off. Dangerous to keep them on with head and tail lights exploding in your eyes...why no windscreen wipers for glasses?0 -
markhewitt1978 wrote:....I don't. Mostly because I just don't like glasses. My wife wears sunglasses all the time and I've tried them but just can't get away with it, I find them really annoying, so the same applies when cycling.0
-
CookeeeMonster wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.
I find that while definitely better with a cap, enough rain will eventually land on the lenses to make visibility worse than without...amplify a 100 times if they start steaming up too.
In the daytime it's not so bad but at night in the rain, they come off. Dangerous to keep them on with head and tail lights exploding in your eyes...why no windscreen wipers for glasses?0 -
I stopped reading at page 3 as the arguments had become circular. I never even knew it was a safety issue. I genuinely thought (and still do) that the glasses were a vanity thing for most riders.
Seriously, I accept you can get stuff in your eye once in a blue but what happens to these people who tried it once without and never again? Amazing thread.
I think some people are just too risk averse.minimizing risk is a valid thing to do but you have to draw boundaries somewhere. I really, really, really do think this an issue out of nothing. I get a bug in my eye once in a blue. Stone chips, I genuinely can't recall being hit in the face (or anywhere above my calf ( yes, off my rear wheel)) by one.
I really must be missing something.0 -
^ This
I never thought of it as a safety measure either.
As for the guy who got something in his eye crossing the road on foot, and mentioned it in this thread, just wow, talk about over reaction. So, I stubbed my toe on the kitchen table for the first time today, I guess that's steel capped boots indoors from now on then.0 -
I used to go on club rides without glasses until one night a swarm of blue bottles each carrying a piece of gravel flying at 65 mph smashed into my eyes, luckily I survived and now I always wear safety goggles on club rides and my rollers just in case.0
-
You guys that joke about things going into your eyes and accuse people of only wearing cycling glasses to show off are funny lol. Forgive me if I feel a lot of you have issues that you need to seek therapy for.
No one is saying it is a life or death decision, or even necessarily a life changing one.
Rain is a bit of a red herring. Unless the majority of your riding is in the rain (I would give up cycling if mine were) then you still have to dress for the non wet rides.
Also you probably cycle differently in the rain, so the need for glasses is going to be lower anyway.
For the record. Although I wear glasses I have never put them in my helmet or on top of a cycling cap (I have never worn a cycling cap without a helmet on top of it).
I also never lean forward with my forearms on bars to chat with fellow riders.0 -
Paul 8v wrote:CookeeeMonster wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.
I find that while definitely better with a cap, enough rain will eventually land on the lenses to make visibility worse than without...amplify a 100 times if they start steaming up too.
In the daytime it's not so bad but at night in the rain, they come off. Dangerous to keep them on with head and tail lights exploding in your eyes...why no windscreen wipers for glasses?
You mean just wipe the snot from them all over your glasses?Trail fun - Transition Bandit
Road - Wilier Izoard Centaur/Cube Agree C62 Disc
Allround - Cotic Solaris0 -
lostboysaint wrote:Paul 8v wrote:CookeeeMonster wrote:bobmcstuff wrote:Cap under the helmet - peak keeps the rain off the lenses quite effectively.
I find that while definitely better with a cap, enough rain will eventually land on the lenses to make visibility worse than without...amplify a 100 times if they start steaming up too.
In the daytime it's not so bad but at night in the rain, they come off. Dangerous to keep them on with head and tail lights exploding in your eyes...why no windscreen wipers for glasses?
You mean just wipe the snot from them all over your glasses?
You have two hands. Wipe on, wipe off0