Intelligent debate
finchy
Posts: 6,686
0
Comments
-
Could you summarise the video, it says an hour and 16Life isnt like a box of chocolates, its like a bag of pic n mix.0
-
Once you've watched the first minute, you've pretty much seen the whole video. It's strangely compelling though.0
-
johnfinch wrote:Once you've watched the first minute, you've pretty much seen the whole video. It's strangely compelling though.
So you sat through it all? I could only take 3 seconds0 -
random man wrote:johnfinch wrote:Once you've watched the first minute, you've pretty much seen the whole video. It's strangely compelling though.
So you sat through it all? I could only take 3 seconds
I managed two minutes, then skipped to random points in the video to see that they were still talking like that. The collapse of civilisation starts here.0 -
simonhead wrote:Could you summarise the video, it says an hour and 16
Either:
Never take crystal meth before attempting to engage in a competitive debate.
or:
What was slightly horrible, was that from the stream of sound that poured out of
his mouth it was almost impossible to distinguish a single word. Just
once Winston caught a phrase--'complete and final elimination of
Goldsteinism'--jerked out very rapidly and, as it seemed, all in one piece,
like a line of type cast solid. For the rest it was just a noise, a
quack-quack-quacking. And yet, though you could not actually hear what the
man was saying, you could not be in any doubt about its general nature.
He might be denouncing Goldstein and demanding sterner measures against
thought-criminals and saboteurs, he might be fulminating against the
atrocities of the Eurasian army, he might be praising Big Brother or the
heroes on the Malabar front--it made no difference. Whatever it was, you
could be certain that every word of it was pure orthodoxy, pure Ingsoc.
As he watched the eyeless face with the jaw moving rapidly up and down,
Winston had a curious feeling that this was not a real human being but
some kind of dummy. It was not the man's brain that was speaking, it was
his larynx. The stuff that was coming out of him consisted of words, but
it was not speech in the true sense: it was a noise uttered in
unconsciousness, like the quacking of a duck.
Syme had fallen silent for a moment, and with the handle of his spoon was
tracing patterns in the puddle of stew. The voice from the other table
quacked rapidly on, easily audible in spite of the surrounding din.
'There is a word in Newspeak,' said Syme, 'I don't know whether you know
it: DUCKSPEAK, to quack like a duck. It is one of those interesting words
that have two contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it is abuse,
applied to someone you agree with, it is praise.'
- George Orwell, Nineteen eighty-four.0