Is it bad form to visit LBS with intention of buying online?
dilatory
Posts: 565
I am interested in a Ridley Fenix. Wiggle seem to have an exclusive 105 version, which is ideal and in my price range. However, their online sizing thing suggest a small (I am 5ft11) and everyone says their sizing is weird. My LBS is a Ridley dealer, so I was thinking of popping down to have a butchers but they wont be able to match the Wiggle deal and it feels a bit like I am being a censored ...
0
Posts
I do think it's bad form, but they'll probably understand. I wouldn't be too surprised if they slagged you off behind your back if you ever brought it in for servicing.
Ps - just checked yeah Wiggle do seem to have a good offer there. The online size guide has you midway between med and large though.
My inseam puts me in the small and my heigh puts me on the medium. I put all my stats into the Canyon (another option) size guide and it suggested I buy small in their road bikes. As a mountain biker I've always preferred a small frame with longer seatpost, but it's a bit of a faux pas on a road bike I believe. I must have a freakish body.
Both my Wyndy and Ritchey are similar geo to that Ridley in an S. Wouldn't have it any other way.
Its just wasting their time and taking the pi55.
As others have said you could give them the chance to match the offer in some way but that may involve some embarrassment.
Can you not just order the small and send it back if its too small?
Have you contacted wiggle about it rather than just used the size guide?
It occurs to me I am 5ft 11 with short arms and short legs. I think I am developing a bit of a complex.
My helmet is a large though... :-(
I realise it's not a full 105 but it looks like it's 105 where it counts to me (bit of a newbie to the road world). The other choices are Rose or Canyon currently, but cost more. Everything is a compromise in the end I suppose.
Nicely crossed spokes...
Admiring your handiwork? I can hardly blame you
Scott CR1
The secret about bikes is that there isn't really that much difference between them. I love how all my bikes ride and the only one I tested was the Foil. Would I have bought it without a test ride? Yup. Thing is, for 99% of people out there it's really about the colour...
Oh and bike fits... yeah, overrated and there are very few people in the UK that can do it properly (and they most likely won't be in your LBS).
Scott CR1
You could be right about the colour but I would disagree that there isn't much difference between bikes - I haven't test ridden that many road bikes but I can certainly notice differences. Anyway Grill I know all about N+1 but why have you got so many different machines if all bikes are the same? Or are they all different colours?
Scott CR1
I'm a compulsive consumer, and yes, they are all different colours. I also use them for different things, but I could easily just use one if I didn't have the means to afford a stable.
When I say all bikes are they same, what I mean is that they all do the same thing. They may do it subtly different, but most wouldn't know or care. Does my Wyndy climb better than my Ritchey? Yup. Is it as solid? Nope. Does that make it a worse bike or the wrong bike for me? Nope.
I managed a ski and board shop in the Alpes for many years. I'd demo 50+ boards a year and almost as many skis. My personal quiver was absolutely massive. Could I tell the difference, no matter how small between them? Sure, but it was my job. I sold out of our stock of boards every year and never had a dissatisfied customer. Was this because I sold them a board that was better suited to their type of riding? I'd like to think so, but the truth is just that they were excited and happy with their purchase. That's pretty much how satisfaction in the retail market works, and bikes are no exception. I've been on rides with dozens upon dozens of people who are riding something new and they never have a bad word to say even if I can clearly see that fit or use is compromised.
I then bought a Boardman as my second bike as my cycle to work scheme allowed me to buy from my local bike shop or halfords. The LBS showed they didn't care when I went in asking about bikes, so I bought from halfords, who had a pleasant and knowledgeable member of staff working weekdays. (When I went back on weekends it was college students whose knowledge of bikes wasn't great.)
My next bike will be entirely self built. There is minimal chance of me test riding the frame beforehand, so whatever I buy will be based on reviews. I may buy through a bikeshop, so I can ask them to do things like crown race installation.
Who did that?
You seem to be assuming the LBS will be gone soon so it seems even more of a pi55 take if you want to waste their time while they are still here lol.
What if a genuine customer comes in and cannot be served because there is no one to speak to?
You would be wasting two peoples time then.
Do you like having your time wasted?
Your moral compass must be well off if you cannot work this out for yourself.
Seems like you know its bad form and just want others to tell you its ok so you do not feel so bad about doing it.
You probably also know that you will find a lot of people happy to do that unfortunately.
Sorry if all this sounds a bit harsh. I am just giving my honest opinion.
The LBS won't disappear, Mr first time buyer and the cycle path family will keep it going, The few that I know are always busy servicing during the week and seem to be full with families at the weekend.
I doubt that bike shops live off the sale of road bikes because once you've bought that first bike you'll buy off the net or build up your own. You're not going to walk in to an LBS and blow 2.5k on a bike when you can get the same bike 20-25% cheaper on the net.
Funnily enough my LBS stocks and sells 3 times as many mountain bikes as road bikes. In fact it only opened it's "road room" a couple of years ago, having had an MTB outlet for nearly 10.
So lie through your teeth and waste there time then.
Do first time buyers and cycle path families buy the Ridley (or the 2.5k bikes you mention later)? If not why would the LBS have one in stock if everyone is buying online?
If servicing is making them rich then why have a shop full of bikes?
It often takes a while before they can fit your work in so they would just get rid of the bikes and have a bigger workshop if it was the bread winner.
Why would they have 80% of their expensive rent space full of bikes if they do not need to sell them?
Fair enough you are not going to spend loads extra to buy in a shop but that does not mean you take the pi55 with them. Just stay away from the shop.
They must be offering something otherwise why go there? Do you think they should give you what they offer for free?
A lot of people would pay 2.5k in an LBS if they did a bit of a deal on spec/parts and then did 0% over 3 years.
I would not rule LBS out as an option, but if its not the best then just don't go there.
The original question was not wether or not to do it, but wether it was bad form.
The answer clearly is that its bad form no matter what conflicting points are conjured up to make it seem acceptable.
When buying more expensive items, mostly watches, I have researched in store and online then gladly gone back to the store and purchased at a higher price to build up a relationship with them. This has at times enabled me to get discounts and even beat internet prices on several occasions.
It is down to your own moral compass as to whether you feel it is fair or not IMO.
I will pay a little extra to shop locally but only a little. If they can't compete on some items then I'll get them online.
--Jens Voight