BB / Axle height
rockmonkeysc
Posts: 14,774
I have seen a few comments about how having a low BB relative to the axle height is good for handling but I can't quite work out why.
I understand that a low BB gives a low overall c of g but how does it's height relative to the axles make a difference?
I have googled it and can't find anything which explains the physics of what (if anything) is happening.
I understand that a low BB gives a low overall c of g but how does it's height relative to the axles make a difference?
I have googled it and can't find anything which explains the physics of what (if anything) is happening.
Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=13070235
0
Comments
-
is it to do with cornering? got no idea though - low BB means more pedal strikes which is what I'm getting with the ghost compared to what I had with the orange0
-
The BB height is relative to the axles as bigger or smaller tyres raise and lower the BB relative to the ground but not the axles.Currently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0
-
The Rookie wrote:The BB height is relative to the axles as bigger or smaller tyres raise and lower the BB relative to the ground but not the axles.Framebuilder
Handbuilt Steel 29er https://goo.gl/RYSbaa
Carbon Stumpjumper https://goo.gl/xJNFcv
Parkwood:http://goo.gl/Gf8xkL
Ribble Gran Fondo https://goo.gl/ZpTFXz
Triban:http://goo.gl/v63FBB0 -
What I mean is that people are claiming that a 29er with a 13" bb height will handle better than a 26" bike with a 13" bb height because the bb is lower relative to the axle height (13" is just a random height).
I can't think of a logical reason why it would make a difference. The BB height from ground is important because it has a major effect on bike/rider combined c of g.
I like a low bb, you have to time crank strokes to avoid pedal strikes sometimes but I think it's worth it for the handling.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350 -
RockmonkeySC wrote:What I mean is that people are claiming that a 29er with a 13" bb height will handle better than a 26" bike with a 13" bb height because the bb is lower relative to the axle height (13" is just a random height).
I can't think of a logical reason why it would make a difference. The BB height from ground is important because it has a major effect on bike/rider combined c of g.
I like a low bb, you have to time crank strokes to avoid pedal strikes sometimes but I think it's worth it for the handling.
All to do with C of G in comparison to axles. Try riding a 13" bb on a bike with 16" wheels you're gonna feel pretty damn perched on top of it. The lower the BB in relation to the axles the more likely you are feel "in" the bike rather than "on" it. The distance between the axle centreline and BB has arguably more influence than BB height alone, but there's a whole lot more to it than simply saying one is better than the other, some people can feel the difference more than others and bikes vary so much what works on one won't necessarily work on another.0 -
What im looking for is a more scientific explanation. Im not saying I don't believe it, I just can't understand how or why it could make a difference.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350