Richard III Leicester or York?
tim_wand
Posts: 2,552
Having lived and worked in both Cities I would say that Leicester is definitely more Richard III than York.
0
Comments
-
tim wand wrote:Having lived and worked in both Cities I would say that Leicester is definitely more Richard III than York.
I really don't think he's bothered.0 -
He spent a few centuries in Leicester, so I reckon he should stay therejc0
-
I'm not bothered really, however don't his decendents want his remains re-patriating to York. Their wishes should be respected. His remains were in Leicester because that was where he fell in battle.Tail end Charlie
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.0 -
Leicester...0
-
no no York...0
-
no Leicester.
No actually New Invention bury him in New Invention.0 -
Compromise, Middle of the Roundabout on the A57 in Worksop.Life isnt like a box of chocolates, its like a bag of pic n mix.0
-
Richard of Leicester? Yeah why not. He's dead, he don't care.You only need two tools: WD40 and Duck Tape.
If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.0 -
He'll earn his keep better in Leicester. York is full of tourists already - it won't get many more just because Richard 3 is there. Leicester will.Faster than a tent.......0
-
York. Leicester is a right dump whereas York is very pretty.0
-
cremate him and let him blow to the four winds - god almost poetic.0
-
I think Leicester is definitely the turd of the two, to be fair I have not been to Yorkmy isetta is a 300cc bike0
-
Lancashire.0