Kittel polygraph
Comments
-
bipedal wrote:First UV blood treatments, now a lie detector test... what's next Paul McKenna?
No, Paul Kimmage. He's the only one who can get the truth of out of dirty cheats*
source: Paul Kimmage0 -
They could always water board him. It works for the CIA I understand.0
-
Didn't Tyler say in his book he took a polygragh and passed?
You can be trained to pass a polygraph apparently.0 -
Also, a polygraph is by no means a valid, reliable lie detector. It doesn't hold up in court very well either.
In fact, proper lie detection tests are still pretty sci-fi. Honestly.0 -
Kittel is the last person to prove anything. This is just silly.0
-
brettjmcc wrote:Didn't Tyler say in his book he took a polygragh and passed?
You can be trained to pass a polygraph apparently.
TH did say he'd take and passed a test. Bert also passed one to try and prove he'd injested clen unknowingly (his laywer later went on to claim that lie detectors are not foolproof).
As Thom Thom says, this is a bit silly.0 -
Indeed it is. Almost as silly as anyone believing that lie detectors actually work.0
-
RichN95 wrote:It's not all good news. While the lie detector did say he was clean, it also said that he was the father of Kayleigh-Marie, the baby of a guest on the Jeremy Kyle show.
However the baby in question, after DNA testing, was later revealed to be entirely the wrong race.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGH1pAQ6Q0s0 -
While I still have issues with Kittel over his previous UV blood doping and him trying to be the poster boy for clean cycling, I will at least concede the gesture of doing a polygraph is admirable.
Leaving out the issue of how accurate it is for the moment, if ALL Pro cyclists were subjected to this, I wonder if any of them would come back with 'negative' results? Not that it would matter - but perhaps it might make authorities at least look at these people with greater scrutiny.0 -
Pokerface wrote:While I still have issues with Kittel over his previous UV blood doping and him trying to be the poster boy for clean cycling, I will at least concede the gesture of doing a polygraph is admirable.
Leaving out the issue of how accurate it is for the moment, if ALL Pro cyclists were subjected to this, I wonder if any of them would come back with 'negative' results? Not that it would matter - but perhaps it might make authorities at least look at these people with greater scrutiny.
false positives
i.e there is a high rate of people who the polygraph claims are lying who are not. Overall, the polygraph is not just slightly unreliable, it really isn't that much better than random guessing.0 -
Contador is the Greatest0
-
If he lies, he lies.0
-
The way around the lie detector test is by telling untruths to begin with because they are looking for differences in the results to the answers you give. If you get asked what your dad's name was and say it was Dave but he was known as Roger during your baseline questions (that show what your normal, non lying response would be), when he wasn't actually known as Roger that could show up as a normal result, so any further questions where you lie would show as normal. They also look for physiological changes such as increased sweating and signs of stress when you are answering questions so if you put yourself under stress to start with and turn up sweaty, chances are you'll beat the test.If you buy it, they will come...
...up to you and say, you didn't want to buy one of them!!!0 -
No one who isn't on something would sport a hairdo like his.0
-
ThomThom wrote:Pokerface wrote:While I still have issues with Kittel over his previous UV blood doping and him trying to be the poster boy for clean cycling, I will at least concede the gesture of doing a polygraph is admirable.
Which turned out years ago that it wasn't blood doping..
Uhhhmmnnnn.... yeah. It was and still is blood doping. It just wasn't illegal at the time. It is now. It was still doping back then, even if it wasn't illegal.
Prior to any form of blood doping being illegal - is it still doping when first conceived? Yes.0 -
Pokerface wrote:ThomThom wrote:Pokerface wrote:While I still have issues with Kittel over his previous UV blood doping and him trying to be the poster boy for clean cycling, I will at least concede the gesture of doing a polygraph is admirable.
Which turned out years ago that it wasn't blood doping..
Uhhhmmnnnn.... yeah. It was and still is blood doping. It just wasn't illegal at the time. It is now. It was still doping back then, even if it wasn't illegal.
Prior to any form of blood doping being illegal - is it still doping when first conceived? Yes.
There was definitely blood involved but he wasn't doping. It wasn't performance enhancing and it wasn't illegal.0 -
Difficult to take anyone who has a 'lie detector' test seriously.--
Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails0 -
It wasn't performance enhancing and it wasn't illegal.
If it wasn't performance enhancing then why do it?0 -
ShinyHelmut wrote:It wasn't performance enhancing and it wasn't illegal.
If it wasn't performance enhancing then why do it?
And as for the the old chesnut of 'if it does't work, why do it' I would refer you to the multi billion dollar homeopathic medicine industry.Twitter: @RichN950 -
I think on the lookalikes thread he's listed as Iceman from Top Gun but he looks a lot like Dolph Lundgren in that picGiant Trance X 2010
Specialized Tricross Sport
My Dad's old racer
Trek Marlin 29er 20120 -
0
-
Pokerface wrote:Prior to any form of blood doping being illegal - is it still doping when first conceived? Yes.
What about health supplements like protein powders and the like taken at specific times and quantities purely with the intent of improving performance? Is that doping then? If that is not performance enhancing then why do it?
Can it be doping but legal and guilt free?0 -
swapping my kebab intake for salad would be performance enhancing, and i'm sure it's legal to do so.....I'm with Colin on this one, don't want to Food Dope so I'll stick with my mixed on naan.0
-
As we know, football's favourite thing - blood spinning - isnt a banned practice
:?0