Ceramic Bearings on Wheels - Gimmick or Beneficial?

Was having a chat with the owner of an LBS in Hampshire this week and got on to talking about wheels. He reckoned that the ceramic bearing thing is a gimmick ie Fulcrum Zeros. His logic is quite sound. Ceramic components were introduced into motor racing to cope with high revolutions and high temperatures. In cycling the RPMs are nowhere near the levels to benefit from the use of ceramic components.
Has anyone got any experience of said products and have they made a difference?
Has anyone got any experience of said products and have they made a difference?
Always be yourself, unless you can be Aaron Rodgers....Then always be Aaron Rodgers.
0
Posts
My understanding though is that the biggest benefit is if your bike is subjected to a lot of wet weather as ceramic bearings don't corrode. Therefore your bearings don't wear out as quickly as normal bearings.
Most bearings used in the cycle industry still have steel races - so those wear out instead. I have wheels with ceramic bearings and wheels with normal bearings - i cant tell the difference. I also have a Hope Ceramic Bottom Bracket on my winter bike and one of the bearings in that has worn out and a bit rumbly. A new bearing alone is £30 from Hope - i will fit a standard one.
Any gains are so small that i recon they arent cost effective for us mere mortals. Maybe for the pro's where a watt or two saved can make a difference then ok they have their place.