Anti -doping doomed to fail .

rayjay
rayjay Posts: 1,384
edited July 2013 in Pro race

Comments

  • thomthom
    thomthom Posts: 3,574
    Definitely needed another thread.
  • kfinlay
    kfinlay Posts: 763
    Interesting??? No, just poor, makes far too many assumptions and is discussing all sports, many of which do very little testing. Additionally, there is more to anti-doping measures than just testing.

    What I do agree on though is there needs to be a change of direction in anti-doping and think the idea of teams submitting all their rider's data for assessment could be an option (but again costs and resources could impact this).
    Kev

    Summer Bike: Colnago C60
    Winter Bike: Vitus Alios
    MTB: 1997 GT Karakorum
  • bockers
    bockers Posts: 146
    Rayjay in "Everyone Dopes" shocker

    :yawn:
  • adr82
    adr82 Posts: 4,002
    "Doomed to fail"??? More like "never going to be 100% effective", which anyone with a functioning brain already knew. Doesn't mean it's not worth having anti-doping programs...
  • morstar
    morstar Posts: 6,190
    adr82 wrote:
    "Doomed to fail"??? More like "never going to be 100% effective", which anyone with a functioning brain already knew. Doesn't mean it's not worth having anti-doping programs...
    This.
    Rick, please lock the thread? Please? Pretty please?
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 40,583
    Who let Trev back on the forum?