Kittel not blood doping

Allez Mark
Allez Mark Posts: 364
edited July 2013 in Pro race
http://t.co/jM9aotvNyZ

From Cyclingnews yesterday

CAS rules UV light blood treatments in Germany were not doping

Kittel identified himself as having undergone treatments in 2007 and 2008

He received more good news the day after winning the closing Tour de France stage on the Champs Elysees, as the Court of Arbitraiton for Sport ruled that the black light blood treatments he and other athletes underwent in 2007 and 2008 could not be considered doping.

The German National Anti Doping Agency had opened proceedings against an unnamed cyclist, charging that the treatments were blood doping. The German sports court ruled last fall that the method of removing blood, treating it with ultraviolet light and then re-infusing it, did not violate rules in effect at the time, as it has been specifically banned only since January, 2012. The NADA took that decision to the CAS.

What's this all about then.

Comments

  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,452
    It's old news. The following summarises it well;

    http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/11017 ... -2011.aspx
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    Sounds a bit like a "WADA DO NOT BAN HOMEOPATHY OR RAKI HEALING" to me....
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • 16mm
    16mm Posts: 545
    You don't transfuse blood for no reason. It's a potentially dangerous medical procedure, not reki or homeopathy.
    Kittel expected the process to have a positive effect on performance.

    Apparently Kittel takes a scrict anti-d0p1ng stance*. I say bolleaux. Just cos it failed doesn't mean the intent wasn't there.


    *http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kittel-sick-of-armstrong-supporters
  • gsk82
    gsk82 Posts: 3,570
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    "Unfortunately these days a lot of people don’t understand the real quality of a bike" Ernesto Colnago
  • Vino'sGhost
    Vino'sGhost Posts: 4,129
    ddraver wrote:
    Sounds a bit like a "WADA DO NOT BAN HOMEOPATHY OR RAKI HEALING" to me....


    See no evil hear no evil eh?
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness

    Because blood doping for performance enhancement is extracting ALOT of blood, removing all the superfluous non oxygen carrying bits then reinjecting it days/weeks/months later when your red blood cells are naturally depleted due to racing

    This (according to the report) is removing a small bit of blood, putting it under UV light FOR A FEW MINUTES! to kill an infection then reinfusing,it in the belief that it will kill the rest of the inection. I.E, Remove a glass full of water from a stagnant swamp, sterilise it, then throw the class back in and declare the whole swamp is safe to drink. Bull...sh1t.

    Edit - beaten by lightning Rich
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • No_Ta_Doctor
    No_Ta_Doctor Posts: 14,549
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness

    We'll we not talking blood bags here. We're talking a few cl.

    It's a practice that has bugger all scientific foundation and is probably about as effective as a go faster stripe on a 1980s Ford Cortina.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format
  • 16mm
    16mm Posts: 545
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness

    We'll we not talking blood bags here. We're talking a few cl.

    It's a practice that has bugger all scientific foundation and is probably about as effective as a go faster stripe on a 1980s Ford Cortina.

    It was done with intent. Re-injecting blood carries a risk, even if it's not a full bag.
    The fact it has no scientific foundation, or effectiveness is not relevant.
    His anti doping stance is hypocritical.
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,452
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.
  • Tom Butcher
    Tom Butcher Posts: 3,830
    16mm wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness

    We'll we not talking blood bags here. We're talking a few cl.

    It's a practice that has bugger all scientific foundation and is probably about as effective as a go faster stripe on a 1980s Ford Cortina.

    It was done with intent. Re-injecting blood carries a risk, even if it's not a full bag.
    The fact it has no scientific foundation, or effectiveness is not relevant.
    His anti doping stance is hypocritical.

    Has he broken any rules ? It seems not.

    it's a hard life if you don't weaken.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    16mm wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness

    We'll we not talking blood bags here. We're talking a few cl.

    It's a practice that has bugger all scientific foundation and is probably about as effective as a go faster stripe on a 1980s Ford Cortina.

    It was done with intent. Re-injecting blood carries a risk, even if it's not a full bag.
    The fact it has no scientific foundation, or effectiveness is not relevant.
    His anti doping stance is hypocritical.

    It was done with the intent to cure an infection, that's not illegal. It was not done with the intent to increase heamatocrit, which is
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • Turfle
    Turfle Posts: 3,762
    andyp wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.

    Whenever he says anything about doping on twitter a handful of people bring this story up.

    And they wonder why cyclists aren't more willing to discuss doping.
  • natrix
    natrix Posts: 1,111
    is probably about as effective as a go faster stripe on a 1980s Ford Cortina.

    Are you seriously trying to tell me that my go faster stripes didn't improve the 0-60 time on my Escort??
    ~~~~~~Sustrans - Join the Movement~~~~~~
  • disgruntledgoat
    disgruntledgoat Posts: 8,957
    File beside Remy Di Gregorio and his glucose injections.
    "In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"

    @gietvangent
  • Setarkos
    Setarkos Posts: 239
    16mm wrote:
    It was done with intent. Re-injecting blood carries a risk, even if it's not a full bag.
    The fact it has no scientific foundation, or effectiveness is not relevant.
    His anti doping stance is hypocritical.

    He probably drinks water with intent as well... which is probably better for perfomance than the UV blood treatment in question.
  • thomthom
    thomthom Posts: 3,574
    andyp wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.

    Exactly. But he beat Cav so there must be something we can find about him... Anything..

    This news can't be news to anyone. It was dismissed long as being nothing and Kittel has since then done everything to make clear how he stand on the doping matter. Mord than anyone else in the peloton.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,793
    it is monumentally stupid thou

    I would hand out 6 month bans for idiocy....

    on a more serious note anybody doing some new treatment that is not specifically banned but is a bit out there, I would like or expect them to ask for some clarification before they indulged in the voodoo.

    What is the story on the rumors of procedures to effect the brains perception of exertion. A lot of stuff written on how the brain calls it a day before the body when it comes to perceived max effort.
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,171
    andyp wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.

    This. At that age I suspect most sports people will take advice from their mentors and it was officially sanctioned. That said, it is good that it was put under scrutiny if we are to move forward.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,793
    Pross wrote:
    andyp wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.

    This. At that age I suspect most sports people will take advice from their mentors and it was officially sanctioned. That said, it is good that it was put under scrutiny if we are to move forward.

    Perhaps its the german olympic program crew who need a talking too
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • Setarkos
    Setarkos Posts: 239
    Perhaps its the german olympic program crew who need a talking too

    The guy who did it was immediately fired and apparently the only one doing it.
  • mididoctors
    mididoctors Posts: 18,793
    Setarkos wrote:
    Perhaps its the german olympic program crew who need a talking too

    The guy who did it was immediately fired and apparently the only one doing it.

    sanity prevailed
    "If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
  • Daz555
    Daz555 Posts: 3,976
    ddraver wrote:
    Sounds a bit like a "WADA DO NOT BAN HOMEOPATHY OR RAKI HEALING" to me....
    Homeopathic EPO is the future.
    You only need two tools: WD40 and Duck Tape.
    If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
    If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.
  • kieranb
    kieranb Posts: 1,674
    Brilliant idea, there would be no trace of it! As a side effect it'll probably cure you of a few diseases.
  • mike6
    mike6 Posts: 1,199
    Pross wrote:
    andyp wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    gsk82 wrote:
    how is removing and reinfusing blood not blood doping? i quite liked kittel but this is grubby in the extreme and must call into question his trustworthiness
    Because a) it's done in small amounts and b) it's taken out and put back in very soon after - no storage.

    It's new age clap trap - there's no actual gains to be made from it. Kittel is guilty of nothing more than gullibility

    Which, when you factor in that a) he was 18-19 years old when this happened and b) was done as part of the German Federation's Olympic programme, is understandable.

    Probably only to those with a brain though, the "they are all dopers" crowd will lap it up.

    This. At that age I suspect most sports people will take advice from their mentors and it was officially sanctioned. That said, it is good that it was put under scrutiny if we are to move forward.

    It beggars belief that his federation would sanction this as part of an Olympic programme. If he had been older and wiser he would probably have asked serious questions. Were the Germans advocating this for all there athletes?