TDF 2013 Spoiler Thread Analysis **No Spoiler**

RideOnTime
RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
edited July 2013 in Pro race
Some important analysis here. What we have is the main spoiler thread for each stage. The 'substance' quotient is the proportion of views to posting. I suppose this is like talking to listening. So Stage 2 was very good at 18.4. Stage 18 was not very good at 6.9. We were all ranting at each other but no one was taking any notice...

I will be test more hypothesis soon;

Stage Posts Views Substance
1 491 8088 16.5
2 265 4883 18.4
3 278 4059 14.6
4 410 6234 15.2
5 411 5370 13.1
6 381 5968 15.7
7 266 3736 14.0
8 498 6586 13.2
9 479 6434 13.4
10 493 7796 15.8
11 712 9355 13.1
12 359 4743 13.2
13 842 9151 10.9
14 279 3210 11.5
15 932 11190 12.0 Ventoux
16 814 8588 10.6
17 661 5987 9.1
18 1408 9651 6.9 L'Alpe d Huez
19

:D:D

Comments

  • Cleat Eastwood
    Cleat Eastwood Posts: 7,508
    I hope you've included house points for stage intros - the bars been set really high with this edition.
    The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
    momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    It would be interesting to explore the issue of joining threads.
    The relationship of pro-cycling comment to general banter. etc.
    The impacts of visual stimulation etc.
    Anyway back to Stage 19...
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    Graphs!!! GRAPHS!!!
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    Oh yes graphs...

    Now then...
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    I was going to do my graphs on Sunday
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • napoleond
    napoleond Posts: 5,992
    The stage intros have been works of forum art.
    Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
    ABCC Cycling Coach
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    I have a graph in Excel for this data.

    How do I get it up - so to speak?
  • Daz555
    Daz555 Posts: 3,976
    RideOnTime wrote:
    I have a graph in Excel for this data.

    How do I get it up - so to speak?
    Screenshot, upload, link to forum.
    You only need two tools: WD40 and Duck Tape.
    If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
    If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.
  • alan_a
    alan_a Posts: 1,583
    Merging rest day with following stage skews results. Date separation required.

    Pie charts, I want pie charts.
  • Daz555
    Daz555 Posts: 3,976
    Alan A wrote:
    Merging rest day with following stage skews results. Date separation required.

    Pie charts, I want pie charts.
    Pie charts begin and end here:

    171.gif
    You only need two tools: WD40 and Duck Tape.
    If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
    If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.
  • napoleond
    napoleond Posts: 5,992
    My fave

    pacmancharthumor.jpg
    Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
    ABCC Cycling Coach
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    Daz555 wrote:
    Alan A wrote:
    Merging rest day with following stage skews results. Date separation required.

    Pie charts, I want pie charts.
    Pie charts begin and end here:

    171.gif

    Is that a tart strictly?
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    :D

    So to explain the chart.

    For those of you with long hair. Here's the science bit.

    We are taking views divided by posts as a proxy for substance - to produce a 'substance ratio'.

    This is of course a very crude measure.
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    I shall commence more detailed analysis of Stage 1. Back soon with results.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    i-47be3a3d77e32d3a8c933efab32c8355-image004.jpg

    i-c9010a59954cd8118efa2ee31027a462-image007.jpg

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT7hmH1NiSMyk5peSvVayyKVXlFXilnAuPUxmYqZFdLZsgz-sh5

    tumblr_l0u94iUb511qa4b44o1_500.png

    tumblr_l9qppuvyFx1qa4b44o1_500.png
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,661
    RideOnTime wrote:
    Thread substance by stage

    Very interesting how there is an overall decline in substance which becomes much more rapid AFTER stage 12. Stage 13 has been argued to be the stage of the tour so far. Interesting that the Axe-3 Domaine stage (when the tour was "over") had little impact

    Be interesting to compare thread length to see if it was a numerical decrease in posts or an increase in posting rather than just looking. For example I think Lichtblick started to make an appearance about then....

    On a personal note I would just like to add that as geology posts have decelined throughout the tour, as predicted, the off topic posts appear to have little impact on thread substance
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    Instead of Stage 1 I have started to analyse Stage 15 - Ventoux. A real biggie with 932 posts.

    I'm working on analysis categories for posts - these I feel need to be mutually exclusive.

    Initially;

    Pro-cycling
    Historical pro-cycling
    Picture offering
    Personal comment - eg I can't watch the cycling today because I'm drilling, going to the dentists, meeting in Milan etc.
    Filler comment
    Raising a cycling question
    Response to a cycling question
    Non cycling informative
    Geology

    Now I'm thinking rather than substance - need to look at whether post raised a new issue or responded to a debate.
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    What wouldn't Meatloaf do for love?

    L'Alpe d ' Huez.

    Imagine that the big fat F*.
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    Still working on this but its far more complex than first meets the eye.

    With 3 weeks work to catch up it may take a little longer. :D:D I have still got 14 hi-lights programmes to watch again. :)
  • smithy21
    smithy21 Posts: 2,204
    Just a quick question- why would you do this?

    I am genuinely curious.
  • RideOnTime
    RideOnTime Posts: 4,712
    smithy21 wrote:
    Just a quick question- why would you do this?

    I am genuinely curious.

    A good and a fair question.

    I think the analysis might answer.

    Is it that you want the analysis in pies?

    I can do pies.

    I thought the bar chart was good. No?