Bake Packs with integrated spine protectors

balmybaldwin
balmybaldwin Posts: 127
edited June 2013 in MTB buying advice
Looking to treat myself to some armour for upcoming trip to Les Arcs, and have come accross hydration packs with integrated back protectors.

What do people make of these? good/bad points?
anyone with experience of this (or the 16L one):
http://www.pocsports.com/en/product/156 ... ne-pack-25
POC Spine pack VPD 2.0


Any idea why it's so much more than the EVOC ones? worht the difference?
http://www.dirtbikebitz.com/evoc-back-p ... oogleBase1


Thanks for your help
Bikes:
Cannondale Killer V 1995 (Promo model) - My first Race bike now converted to a commuter
Lapierre X-Flow 712 - XC fs rocket
Pivot Mach 6 - Enduro Machine
Pinarello FP2 - Roadie

Comments

  • warpcow
    warpcow Posts: 1,448
    POC stuff is just always expensive, not always better quality though.

    I borrowed an EVOC one for a trip last summer and it was very comfy. Didn't notice it was any bulkier than the Mule I normally ride with.
  • cooldad
    cooldad Posts: 32,599
    For French baked goods I suggest croissants.
    I don't do smileys.

    There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

    London Calling on Facebook

    Parktools
  • balmybaldwin
    balmybaldwin Posts: 127
    cooldad wrote:
    For French baked goods I suggest croissants.

    Tried these when climbing, they're not good for protection though
    Bikes:
    Cannondale Killer V 1995 (Promo model) - My first Race bike now converted to a commuter
    Lapierre X-Flow 712 - XC fs rocket
    Pivot Mach 6 - Enduro Machine
    Pinarello FP2 - Roadie
  • cooldad
    cooldad Posts: 32,599
    Protection? MTFU and eat poncy rolls.
    I don't do smileys.

    There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

    London Calling on Facebook

    Parktools
  • Kowalski675
    Kowalski675 Posts: 4,412
    They're both certified to the higher level 2 standard (maximum 12 kN force transferred), so offer comparable levels of protection.
  • I've only seen an evoc bag up close out of the two, was Very impressed by it, the idea of the spine protection caught my eye most, and the ability to unzip the main bag from the spine protection for repeated short runs etc. The only thing that put me off was the cost, which is really quite daft as it would only tale one impact that could save your spine for it to be worth Much more than its purchase price!
    Timmo.
    After all, I am Cornish!
    http://cornwallmtb.kk5.org/
    Cotic Soul, The bike of Legends!:wink: Yes, I Am a bike tart!
    http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtop ... 1#16297481
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    I've got an EVOC backpack with the spine board thing and i haven't actually had to utilise it yet, touch wood, but i can tell you the backpack itself is very good and worth the money.
  • Kowalski675
    Kowalski675 Posts: 4,412
    I've only seen an evoc bag up close out of the two, was Very impressed by it, the idea of the spine protection caught my eye most, and the ability to unzip the main bag from the spine protection for repeated short runs etc. The only thing that put me off was the cost, which is really quite daft as it would only tale one impact that could save your spine for it to be worth Much more than its purchase price!

    Back prorectors are a bit misunderstood. They're not really meant to save you from breaking your spine - that takes a pretty big impact and a back protector's unlikely to stop it. Their real purpose is to prevent (or significantly reduce) soft tissue injury associated with a back impact. Back protectors are pretty standard fare in the motorcycling world these days (i always wear one when I ride) and a decent one isn't even noticeable when you're riding, but chest protectors are becoming increasingly common too - blunt chest trauma is the second biggest killer in bike accidents after head injuries.
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    Aren't back protectors to protect against point impacts? Or is that what you meant.
  • Kowalski675
    Kowalski675 Posts: 4,412
    Aren't back protectors to protect against point impacts? Or is that what you meant.

    They're not designed to stop penetration, if that's what you mean? (Many are now soft and flexy for comfort, without the hardshell exterior that early ones had). Like any armour, they're designed to dissipate the energy of an impact, absorbing it and spreading it out over a larger area, just like a crash helmet (so in that respect yes they help protect against point impacts, if that's what you mean). Back protectors are meant to prevent or minimise soft tissue injury, rather than prevent a broken back though. Spinal injury is usually caused by the spine being bent backward (it's not designed to flex that way), and back protectors can't stop that.
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    Aren't back protectors to protect against point impacts? Or is that what you meant.
    (so in that respect yes they help protect against point impacts, if that's what you mean)
    That's what i said. Was just clarifying what you meant in your original post.
  • Kowalski675
    Kowalski675 Posts: 4,412
    I wasn't sure whether you meant penetration type injuries (ooer missus...).
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    There's a different kind of protection for that.
  • Kowalski675
    Kowalski675 Posts: 4,412
    Arrowhead's mum's the expert there.