Trails marked on OS map as black dashes
booktownman
Posts: 151
Can anyone help with this - what's the score with riding trails marked on OS maps as black dashes?
I can see there's a trail on Google sat images, it's marked on the map with black dashes, it's not designated as a footpath - can I legally ride it?
Cheers in advance,
BTM
I can see there's a trail on Google sat images, it's marked on the map with black dashes, it's not designated as a footpath - can I legally ride it?
Cheers in advance,
BTM
0
Comments
-
booktownman wrote:Can anyone help with this - what's the score with riding trails marked on OS maps as black dashes?
I can see there's a trail on Google sat images, it's marked on the map with black dashes, it's not designated as a footpath - can I legally ride it?
Cheers in advance,
BTM
they are private roads/paths so legally you can't apart from when you can!0 -
-
They're not private roads - they're up a mountain in the middle of nowhere in a national park. Not county boundaries either. They're trails that are regularly walked, but not designated as footpaths.0
-
Yeah, they're paths.
But not 'footpaths' ie public rights of way0 -
My bad I misread the OP.
As said there paths not classified.Technically you can't ride them as they're not Bridleways but they're not technically Footpaths either so it's a grey area.0 -
What about in scotland, on OS map there are no footpaths or bridleway, just dashed black lines and dashed fireroads??0
-
-
-
ibbo68 wrote:My bad I misread the OP.
As said there paths not classified.Technically you can't ride them as they're not Bridleways but they're not technically Footpaths either so it's a grey area.
There must be an answer to this.
Technically you can't walk on them either then?
I can think of paths in the Brecon Beacons that are part of established walking routes, eg the Pen Y Fan horseshoe, but which aren't designated footpaths - they're marked with black dashes.
If you can walk them, why can't you ride them?0 -
booktownman wrote:If you can walk them, why can't you ride them?
Under the CRoW (2000) act walkers were given the extra freedom of "right to Roam" anywhere,path or not(unless specifically signed/MOD etc).
Bikes/Horses were not included so we're still stuck where we were in terms of what we can (legitimately) ride.It is however up to the Landowner to prosecute for trespass and it's practically impossible to Police.
I find if you're courteous then generally you get no hassle 8)
Scotland has different(better?) legislation.The are no plans to change the legislation in England and Wales despite many different petitions.0 -
Yeah go wherever you can in the land of the Scotch0
-
As far as I understand it, a GREEN dotted line is a legal footpath, a green dashed line is a legal bridleway (that you can legally ride on), but black lines (short or long dashed) are not necessarily legal rights of way (for riding or walking) (discretion of the land owner rather than a national "right of way"). However, with the new access legislation, if the map shows the shaded yellowish areas in the uplands, that is open access land, at least for walkers. I would personally interpret that as being able to ride on a black dashed (but not dotted) line within a yellowish-open-access area - this may not be the actual legal position officially, but it seems perfectly sensible, given that dashed is supposed to mean a bigger track for horses/carts/bikes as opposed to the dotted lines that are supposed to mean feet, sort of. But to be honest, surely there's plenty of officially legal green dashed lines for us? Occasionally to join 2 obvious legal bridleways up you might have to do 100m of "illegal" stuff, so either risk it if it looks like it won't do any harm, or get off and walk that bit.
Scotland is great, there are fewer such worries. You can't actually ride anywhere - the access there is RESPONSIBLE access, and does not include inbye-fields, gardens, obvious things like that, and can't cause damage or disturbance to wildlife, livestock, residents etc etc - so a few grey areas but in practice, common sense should mean it's pretty obvious most of the time if you should or shouldn't ride.
Lucy0 -
I had an interesting chat with a Rights of Way officer for one of the national parks as I was considering getting involved in the Local Access Forum and seeing if there was any way of opening up some of these clearly well-used but undesignated paths to MTB.
As someone above says, there is no official permission from the relavant landowner to ride OR walk on these undesignated paths. However, the ROW officer's feeling was that landowners aren't bothered until the path - or the people using it - become an issue.
The advice was to be sensible, use your own judgement and don't rock the boat. Attempting to formalise the use of a path that - although - undesignated, is well known and regularly used by riders could go against you. It it ain't broke, don't fix it.0