Help! Noob needs your help buyin first bike!

Jamesyboy7
Jamesyboy7 Posts: 13
edited March 2013 in MTB buying advice
Help! :shock:

Im Buying my first serious bike today. in a few hours!

i want you to help me pick the better bike for my money.
i will be using this for long bike rides, maybe a few trails. an all rounder really.

first up,
we have the SCOTT Aspect 10
http://paulscycles.co.uk/products.php?plid=m1b0s2p3233
The RRP is 900.. so im guessing it must have some good stuff, i know the forks are decent :)

Cannondale trail SL 3 2011
http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/products.p ... 1b0s2p3694
The RRP is less on this one, but i really like cannondales.

If you could reply back with some knowledge id really appreciate it.
im buying either bike in a few hours so need as much help as possible.

Thank you for reading.
- James.

Comments

  • Chunkers1980
    Chunkers1980 Posts: 8,035
    I'd have the Scott.
  • Hope I help you by just expressing my personal preference. In this draw i'd pick the Scott. That said, frames are similar and forks are both coilsprung so little difference and adjustability.

    The only other bike i'd consider at this pricepoint is a Kona. In this price (or any?) range they're easily the most fun to ride.
  • Jamesyboy7
    Jamesyboy7 Posts: 13
    edited March 2013
    Thanks, any reasons why chunkers?
  • looks like im buying the scott, lol thank you.
  • Thewaylander
    Thewaylander Posts: 8,593
    To be hones ti wuold dale out of those 2,

    mostly because historically i have owned a dale and its was a first class bike, the frame build was beautiful at the the time with sanded welds that were totally smooth.. loved it!
  • thanks mate. what about the components? can u do a comparison for me?
  • Thewaylander
    Thewaylander Posts: 8,593
    Scott is better equiped in terms of gear.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    They are very similarly specced, but I think the sl3 shades it
  • im so confused, i dont have a clue which 1 to go for. can some 1 compare components?
  • Chunkers1980
    Chunkers1980 Posts: 8,035
    None. Beg and borrow 100 more and get this

    http://paulscycles.co.uk/products.php?plid=m1b0s2p4207
  • cant afford the cube lol
  • Thewaylander
    Thewaylander Posts: 8,593
    I'd be all over the dale but i really like there hardtails.
  • so u think the dale is better?
  • i think im gonna buy the cannondale, ordering it about 1pm.
  • cooldad
    cooldad Posts: 32,599
    I wouldn't. RS fork parts are easy to get. Not so sure about RST. That would do it for me.
    I don't do smileys.

    There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

    London Calling on Facebook

    Parktools
  • but the cannondale is so pretty :( haha
  • Chunkers1980
    Chunkers1980 Posts: 8,035
    The cube gets you an air fork, Formula brakes, 10 speed, 2 pc crank, named finishing kit - all in all much more future proof and easily worth the extra 100.

    Prettiness - it is how it rides that really counts
  • my budget is 500, its rather the scott or the dale. im leaning towards the dale atm.
  • FatMikeUK
    FatMikeUK Posts: 51
    Personally I'd go with the Scott, but I think you're worrying a bit much. Like everyone's already said, there's not a lot in it, you'll not be kicking yourself either way. If you really like the look of the Cannondale then go with it, you'll probably end up upgrading and replacing parts in a few months anyway, and both seem like perfectly good frames for that.
  • im buying the scott now, only reason i can think of is better forks and the RRP is higher, lol thanks guys.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    The Cannondale has the better fork, just to confuse you ;-). But both are good performers for the money.
  • Got the SCOTT. its amazing :) buy need a bit of help with the rockshox tora, the lockout switch doesnt lockout the forks. any ideas? must need tightening? i dont knowww