swapping tyres?

danlightbulb
danlightbulb Posts: 701
edited March 2013 in MTB general
Do people here swap tyres if you're going to a different trail?

I currently have 2.2 Mountain King II's (only cheap wire bead ones), which are fine for Cannock where I normally ride. However I am going for 2 days to north wales (Penmachno and Marin trails), and I also have a pair of Rubber Queens (2.4 front and 2.2 rear, again cheap wire bead), and I am wondering whether these trails would suit the Rubber Queens better or not? By putting the Rubber Queens on I'd be adding around 600g to the bike weight.

I also have a pair of Michellin Country X trail which came with my bike, which are folding (as I discovered when I took them off the bike). Not weighed these but wondering if they are any good? I only rode with them once when i first had the bike but it was wet and they felt quite sketchy.

Thanks
Dan

Comments

  • RobJ20
    RobJ20 Posts: 48
    No i run Hans Dampf all the time now.
  • .blitz
    .blitz Posts: 6,197
    I used to but now I just select the appropriate bike :wink:
  • tarbot18
    tarbot18 Posts: 531
    i use nobby nic all year round ,dont see the point in changing tyres its either wet muddy or both up north.......
    The family that rides together stays together !

    Boardman Comp 29er 2013

    Whyte T129s 2014 viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=12965414&p=18823801&hilit=whyte+t129s#p18823801

    Road Scott speedster s50 2011
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    Generally no, but i do change tyres for the seasons.
  • mcnultycop
    mcnultycop Posts: 2,143
    I never want to have to get a tyre on my Flows again; I wouldn't change one through choice,.
  • njee20
    njee20 Posts: 9,613
    I change tyres for racing, for riding I just use whatever's fitted!
  • RandG
    RandG Posts: 779
    I do it often. From HD's to NN's to Ardents and back. Not even sure why tbh. The HD's are great for Winter riding but very draggy on harder surfaces, so dependent on where I'm riding I change.
  • bartimaeus
    bartimaeus Posts: 1,812
    I've been running MudX since last April - but if I went somewhere less muddy/slimy/snowy I might swap to my '3 season' tyres (for 'season' read 'week').
    Vitus Sentier VR+ (2018) GT Grade AL 105 (2016)
    Giant Anthem X4 (2010) GT Avalanche 1.0 (2010)
    Kingley Vale and QECP Trail Collective - QECP Trail Building
  • lawman
    lawman Posts: 6,868
    Once my hans dampfs arrive I'll have a set of tyres for all weathers hopefully! For pure XC stuff I'll have a set of Nobby Nic Gatestars, anywhere gnarlier but still having to ride a fair distance i.e. most stuff at uni I'll probably put a hans on the front, and tbh I'll probably use that setup most of the time. For dry DH days Hans dampfs all-round, if its abit wet I've got a muddy mary for the front and for full on winter DH both Muddy Marys will go on, most likely the 456 for that though, the HD's a royal pain to clean when its properly caked!

    And in case you were wondering I'm abit of a Schwalbe fan!!
  • Mccraque
    Mccraque Posts: 819
    My set up of choice is always a Rubber Queen on the front for grip and bulbousness - and something season specific on the rear. In winter usually a Miud X (or at the moment a Mountain King as I had one laying around) and in summer I switch to a crossmark or Race king on the rear for less rolling resistance.
  • DCR00
    DCR00 Posts: 2,160
    I find Minions work pretty well all year round, but they do drag a bit, so im getting some Ardents to try for the trail bike

    if im doing any XC riding, or out with the nipper, i change to a NN/RR combo

    I also have Minions on my DH rig, but have some Swamp Things spare for when things get muddy (havent actually been used yet)
  • swod1
    swod1 Posts: 1,639
    Are high rollers suitable for all round use or maxxis advantage ?
  • Northwind
    Northwind Posts: 14,675
    I sometimes change, especially for racing... Tyres that work well in innerleithen off-piste slop tend to be pretty damn slow for anything not made of slime, so it's hard to get one tyre to rule them all.
    Uncompromising extremist
  • 97th choice
    97th choice Posts: 2,222
    I alternate between nobby nics and maxxis high rollers depending upon the conditions.
    Too-ra-loo-ra, too-ra-loo-rye, aye

    Giant Trance
    Radon ZR 27.5 Race
    Btwin Alur700
    Merida CX500
  • Well I've just put the rubber queens on. The 2.4" only actually measures just over 2" which is a good job because at 2.4" it would never have fitted between my forks. Its visibly bigger than the 2.2 Mountain King I had on before though, I'll see if it makes any difference on Sunday.
  • lawman
    lawman Posts: 6,868
    Well I've just put the rubber queens on. The 2.4" only actually measures just over 2" which is a good job because at 2.4" it would never have fitted between my forks. Its visibly bigger than the 2.2 Mountain King I had on before though, I'll see if it makes any difference on Sunday.

    Sounds very odd because Rubber Queens are huge!! The 2.4 normally blows up like a 2.5 or bigger
  • Its the weight I'm worried about more than anything, the 2.4 weighed 1050g, making my front wheel weigh 2.4kg total. The rear with the 2.2 RQ has only gone up by 150g to 2.8kg total. Is this heavy? Ive only ever ridden with the 2.2 Mountain Kings so not really sure what difference its going to make or what direction I should be aiming for weight wise.
  • bennett_346
    bennett_346 Posts: 5,029
    lawman wrote:
    Well I've just put the rubber queens on. The 2.4" only actually measures just over 2" which is a good job because at 2.4" it would never have fitted between my forks. Its visibly bigger than the 2.2 Mountain King I had on before though, I'll see if it makes any difference on Sunday.

    Sounds very odd because Rubber Queens are huge!! The 2.4 normally blows up like a 2.5 or bigger
    Yeah something sounds wrong there. Measure twice :wink:
  • lawman
    lawman Posts: 6,868
    Its the weight I'm worried about more than anything, the 2.4 weighed 1050g, making my front wheel weigh 2.4kg total. The rear with the 2.2 RQ has only gone up by 150g to 2.8kg total. Is this heavy? Ive only ever ridden with the 2.2 Mountain Kings so not really sure what difference its going to make or what direction I should be aiming for weight wise.

    Yep thats heavy, my 2.35 muddy Marys are 900g and are also a pretty big tyre. You'll have added at least half a kilo across both tyres, maybe more and as its rotating weight you'll notice it alot more and a 2.4 rubber queen is a slow tyre anyway. What bike is it on? Seems an odd choice if you normally only run 2.2 Mountain kings.

    Ideally a compromise between low weight, grip and low-rolling resistance is best. weight wise something between 500-700g ish is a decent weight, if you ride hard, gnarly and rocky trails go for something like a Hans Dampf or if it's more xc a mountain king or Nobby Nic are good all-rounders
  • concorde
    concorde Posts: 1,008
    Minion up front and ardent rear through the winter or more like 9 months a year. In the 'heights of summer' I'll have a rocket ron rear and not sure what to go with up front this summer... maybe a rubber queen.
  • Northwind
    Northwind Posts: 14,675
    OEM spec rubber queens, those- different carcass so might size up differently

    (I like the "RQs are huge" commentary, mine were both fractionally undersized, we've just got used to tyre sizes, especially Conti and Maxxis ones, being huge lies...)
    Uncompromising extremist
  • lawman wrote:
    Its the weight I'm worried about more than anything, the 2.4 weighed 1050g, making my front wheel weigh 2.4kg total. The rear with the 2.2 RQ has only gone up by 150g to 2.8kg total. Is this heavy? Ive only ever ridden with the 2.2 Mountain Kings so not really sure what difference its going to make or what direction I should be aiming for weight wise.

    Yep thats heavy, my 2.35 muddy Marys are 900g and are also a pretty big tyre. You'll have added at least half a kilo across both tyres, maybe more and as its rotating weight you'll notice it alot more and a 2.4 rubber queen is a slow tyre anyway. What bike is it on? Seems an odd choice if you normally only run 2.2 Mountain kings.

    Ideally a compromise between low weight, grip and low-rolling resistance is best. weight wise something between 500-700g ish is a decent weight, if you ride hard, gnarly and rocky trails go for something like a Hans Dampf or if it's more xc a mountain king or Nobby Nic are good all-rounders

    I got them cheap 2nd hand so I thought I'd try them out. Its on a RR8.1,but I've been trying to get it to be a bit more trail friendly than pure XC and thought burlier tyres might help. Maybe I'm misguided though. I would like to buy some better, grippier but light tyres but I'm not racing so dont want to get some puncture prone lightweight ones. Plus I cant just keep buying different tyres. Its a minefield.
  • Northwind
    Northwind Posts: 14,675
    If they're working for you, don't worry too much! I like a light bike personally but it's all a balance of price and performance. Sometimes a slow, heavy tyre just makes things hard work- it can make fast trails feel slow, or the bike feel a bit ponderous. But not always and the way I see it is, "too little" tyre leaves you either having to slow down, or having a big crash, "too much" tyre just tires you out. I prefer sweat to blood ;)
    Uncompromising extremist