Skyfall
gtvlusso
Posts: 5,112
Watched it for the second time last night.
Goes to sh*t as soon as 'Q' gets involved IMHO.
Carry on!
Goes to sh*t as soon as 'Q' gets involved IMHO.
Carry on!
0
Comments
-
I didn't enjoy it much at all, very overrated, and the oscar winning song was instantly forgettable.Smarter than the average bear.0
-
I watched it, and forgot to watch for my sister's credit at the end. I'm a rubbish brother.
0 -
I was hoping to watch it on Lovefilm now that the DVD is out but they haven't got it to rent for another month, d'oh.0
-
I thought it was OK, but not nearly as good as Casino Royale.
I came away without a strong sense of what the plot was.0 -
I didn't mind it, better that a lot of some of the rubbish that was released this year IMHO.Pain hurts much less if its topped off with beating your mates to top of a climb.0
-
Didn't love it, didn't hate it.
The action was pretty good, but the plot (and motivation of the villain) was very thin.
Might give it another go on Sky and see if it's any better on the sofa than in the cinema.0 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TnLe2-a7Nc
Says it all really. I thought it was terrible. Lots of kabooms and blammo but even that wasn't done very well...0 -
-
BigMonka wrote:I was hoping to watch it on Lovefilm now that the DVD is out but they haven't got it to rent for another month, d'oh.
I watched it here, no need to log on/join etc, just watch...
http://oxe7.com/filmes/17344-skyfall-dvd-r.htmlmy isetta is a 300cc bike0 -
http://www.ledomestiquetours.co.uk
Le Domestique Tours - Bespoke cycling experiences with unrivalled supported riding, knowledge and expertise.
Ciocc Extro - FCN 10 -
UndercoverElephant wrote:I really enjoyed it. Thought it was an excellent film. Much more Bond than Casino Royale, which I thought had gone waaaay to much like Bourne.
The corpse of Ian Fleming might disagree with this.....! Casino Royale, minus the opening and closing sequences is pure Fleming Bond and remarkably accurate to the book.
Disappointed re Skyfall (not seen it yet) - everyone was saying it was the best ever Bond
Faster than a tent.......0 -
Love honest trailers. I also love James Bond films and books, which is why I hate anything after GoldenEye. Its all been complete rubbish since then!
Even Casino Royal wasn't very good. Its not very true to the book, for a start its not set in the 60's or whatever... They should've made a retro film for CR.
If you like Skyfall then you're easily pleased.0 -
Daddy0 wrote:Love honest trailers. I also love James Bond films and books, which is why I hate anything after GoldenEye. Its all been complete rubbish since then!
Even Casino Royal wasn't very good. Its not very true to the book, for a start its not set in the 60's or whatever... They should've made a retro film for CR.
If you like Skyfall then you're easily pleased.
Are you sure you have actually read Casino Royale - the film was very close to the book; certainly amongst the closest of all the films to the books. Yes, it wasn't set in the 60s (and ultimately the drug money motive is much less interesting than the Soviet menace but it isn't that important to the plot in the end) but then most of the books were written in the 50s anyway (Casino Royale being from 1953) so none of the films are quite true to period though some are only a few years out. Casino Royale (film) to its credit even made a decent fist of the card game even if they had to change it to poker.
Retro would be nice but it isn't what people want from a Bond film sadly. There are a whole load of the films that could be redone more true to the books and in period and they could make great films; Moonraker is an obvious candidate.Faster than a tent.......0
