High-end steel or low-end titanium

bjornwong

I have two carbon race bikes that I use for serious riding and races - an Isaac and a Ridley. Both are great racy bikes but can be harsh in terms or stiffness and geometry on longer rides like centuries.

I've hnce been meaning to get something more comfortable and durable in the long run. Something as good for double centuries is it is for climbing. Something that can take a few knocks and has the classic style that will still remain current a decade from now. And something that will not break the bank.

I've narrowed it down to two bikes rather incongruent from each other: Lynskey Breakaway from the brand's new Silver Series; and a second-hand DeRosa Neo Primato. Both are around the same price but that's where the similarities end.

VTech

http://www.smartcycles.com/frame_materials.htm

This may help you decide.

napoleond

That article is 9yes old. A fair bit has changed since then. Having said that a top end steel frame is always a good buy.

tim_wand

Maybe your fairly easy to fit. Transferring measurements from your carbon bikes doesnt seem an option though as they are more race orientated and your looking for a more relaxed set up.

If your considering Hi end steel then surely one of the main advantages would be the option to custom build, and get a combination of tubing and geometry that really works for you, and is unique, even if its just the paint scheme.

The De Rosa is a lust worthy bike, but spending this kind of money, I d want something new, concentrating the main budget on getting the best frame I could affoard, possibly 953 or columbus xcr (Stainless but can ride harsh) so maybe a combination of tubes . I would then have something which would have the longevity to warrant future upgrades in Gruppo or wheelset when the budget allows.