Hugh Porter
So according to today's papers, Hugh Porter has been let go from the BBC due to his age.
This is outrageous! He's the best in the game and was the voice of the Olympics.
Hugh Porter is a master at Cycling commentary. His rapid creation of relevant, thoughtful, knowledgable and creative sentences, delivered with passion and authority, is all the insight and drama BBC Sport needs for its Cycling coverage. Give him his job back!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/others ... d-men.html
This is outrageous! He's the best in the game and was the voice of the Olympics.
Hugh Porter is a master at Cycling commentary. His rapid creation of relevant, thoughtful, knowledgable and creative sentences, delivered with passion and authority, is all the insight and drama BBC Sport needs for its Cycling coverage. Give him his job back!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/others ... d-men.html
0
Comments
-
-
Rick Chasey wrote:Not sure if......
Solid effort : 7 / 10Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
Erm...no, sorry, Porter being replaced was well overdue. I admit that he's better on track commentary than road but Simon Brotherton teamed up with Chris Boardman for the Minsk coverage, was a marked improvement.
As for road...he has no clue who the teams are apart from Sky, no idea who the riders are apart from the headlining Brits, and no idea of the tactics. God knows how many times David Millar had to (gently) correct his mistakes during last year's Worlds RR.0 -
Richmond Racer wrote:Erm...no, sorry, Porter being replaced was well overdue. I admit that he's better on track commentary than road but Simon Brotherton teamed up with Chris Boardman for the Minsk coverage, was a marked improvement.
As for road...he has no clue who the teams are apart from Sky, no idea who the riders are apart from the headlining Brits, and no idea of the tactics. God knows how many times David Millar had to (gently) correct his mistakes during last year's Worlds RR.
+1
Porter is well past it on the road, error after error. He's worse than Phil and Paul.0 -
I'm with Rick and Iain on this one.0
-
Okay, so, I did mean more so track than road, but he's a great icon for cycling and I don't think he should be dropped entirely.0
-
I've enjoyed his track commentary, and I think it's a shame, but he's really not good enough any more. Would be nice to have him giving his opinion in a studio at track meets as I think he could still add some value when he has a bit more time to consider things rather than commentating.0
-
Steve Rider does the classic interviews with F1 stars on Sky, John Motson gets a token match a week, Barry Davies does the synchronised swimming, it happens to all the best commentators.
Simon Brotherton is just as good at track, if not better for being "fresh"0 -
Have to say I think it's the right move, though it's never nice for someone to be moved on, especially someone with Hugh's enthusiasm and standing in British cycling. But things move on and unfortunately he has struggled in recent years.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0
-
mind that door..0
-
he's emotive, he's passionate, but regrettably nowadays thats it. watching 2 of the supposed highlights this year Olympic road race and the worlds, he blundered through them..... wasn't pleasant.
having said that he's still not the worst. that antony whatever his name that commentated on the vuelta sounded awful....0 -
Insta: ATEnduranceCoaching
ABCC Cycling Coach0 -
0
-
NapoleonD wrote:
Best enjoyed with just the left earphone in.0 -
-
I heard, earlier. Sad.
However, definitely showing signs of following a Duffer's decline."Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
I like Hugh Porter, but in recent years he's definitely been struggling to inform viewers about little things like riders and race situations. It happens to us all eventually.0
-
Think it'll be more then just his age. But its a change that should have been made awhile ago.0
-
greasedscotsman wrote:
This is hands down heavyweight. Thanks for the reminder.Contador is the Greatest0 -
-
I dont think its necessarily the wrong thing for them to have done, its just the manner of it, the Telegraph article makes out it happened only in the week before Hugh had been expecting to fly out to Minsk, then the BBC compounded it by suggesting he'd taken the decision to retire himself and showing that tribute...except hes still doing the Winter olympics...I dunno youd have thought theyd have been thinking about making commentating changes directly after the Olympics, not wait till a week or so before a major event they are covering.0
-
frenchfighter wrote:greasedscotsman wrote:
This is hands down heavyweight. Thanks for the reminder.
Great finish, great commentary!0 -
His commentary for road events was IMO quite dire, it was OK for the track events though.
I think ideally you'd have a different set of commentators for track and road, they require different styles.You live and learn. At any rate, you live0 -
Anyone having withdrawal symptoms get yourselves to Abergavenny in July. He'll no doubt still be commentating on the elite circuit race and the Grand Prix road race. Much as I like the man (he got the crowd to give me a cheer when I got dropped in a junior crit many years ago ) it was definitely overdue I'm afraid.0
-
Now then... Hugh was a bit past his sell by date, he struggled with the road commentary although he could still "light the afterburners" for a bit of track. Probably a good move by the BBC but poorly executed. the trouble with large organisations is that it is always someone else's responsibility to do these things so they f*ck it up and leave it embarrassingly ill timed.
I guess he'll still do the Revolutions?0 -
Never liked him sorry, absolutely terrible listening to him in olympic road rces imo. He didn't have a clue ....0
-
Rick Chasey wrote:This trumps it all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bGv7ltJGPA
Trouble with all of these examples are they are commentating on something very exciting. That's easy. The ultimate test should be on something very dull. How about this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl-oAsDCGNA0 -
I'm glad I wont have to listen to Hughie talking about riders "putting the hammer down" or the track girls "making a good fist of it" any more. In fact his commentary of women's cycling was misogynistic at best.
Respect for his cycling career though. I found my copy of "Champion on Two Wheels" at me moms the other day.BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
Instagramme0 -
From an accuracy and awareness point of view relating to road racing, I've got no problem with him going. Any chance he could take Phil with him too...
He is quite a bit better when it comes to track, but still time for him to go.
No reflection on his achievements on the bike, but that was quite a while ago.0 -
Ha, that Danny Hart commentary was quality - hadn't heard that before.
On Hugh Porter, he made a few big mistakes during the Olympics, but one massive one in the women's keirin final, shouting continuously about Anna Meares as Pendleton crossed the line to win Olympic Gold. It basically sounded as though Meares had won the race so they had to edit the commentary afterwards for the highlights. You can see why the Beeb would take that sort of stuff seriously cos these are historic moments that great commentary can help define ("some people are on the pitch...they think it's all over..." etc). It's also one of the reasons why quite a few of the commentators seemed to be sh*tting it during the Olympics!0