Wheel lacing question
lotus49
Posts: 763
I was looking at the back wheel on my Giant Defy 3 yesterday and noticed that the drive side spokes cross but the non-drive side spokes are simply radial.
I understand why they need to cross but I am curious about two things. Is it typical that this is the case only on one side of a rear wheel and is it always the drive side?
I understand why they need to cross but I am curious about two things. Is it typical that this is the case only on one side of a rear wheel and is it always the drive side?
0
Comments
-
If hesitate a guess that its to do with strengthening the drive side to counter rotational torque. I've seen a lot of wheels use this pattern.0
-
The drive side experiences torsional load, the non drive side gets less of it... These days most rear wheels are laced with that pattern. My take is that it saves time. I never use it as I don't really see any benefit in itleft the forum March 20230
-
ugo.santalucia wrote:The drive side experiences torsional load, the non drive side gets less of it... These days most rear wheels are laced with that pattern. My take is that it saves time. I never use it as I don't really see any benefit in it
I'll shut up then. :oops:0 -
ugo.santalucia wrote:The drive side experiences torsional load, the non drive side gets less of it... These days most rear wheels are laced with that pattern. My take is that it saves time. I never use it as I don't really see any benefit in it
When you lace a rear wheel (and I know you have a lot of experience doing this) do you use a crossed pattern on both sides and do you usually have more spokes on the drive side or are your wheels fully symmetrical?0 -
If you laced a wheel to be radial on the drive side and with x on the other then all the torque would need to be transmitted via the hub. There is not 'much' flex in a hub, but there is some, and it makes sense to remove all unnecessary forces and stresses where possible- it can only help.0
-
lotus49 wrote:ugo.santalucia wrote:The drive side experiences torsional load, the non drive side gets less of it... These days most rear wheels are laced with that pattern. My take is that it saves time. I never use it as I don't really see any benefit in it
When you lace a rear wheel (and I know you have a lot of experience doing this) do you use a crossed pattern on both sides and do you usually have more spokes on the drive side or are your wheels fully symmetrical?
The 2:1 lacing pattern is only used by factory wheels makers to keep the tension equal on both sides of the wheel. The result is a weaker wheel of course... plus it requires hubs drilled appropriately. You can do it using a 24 H rim and a 32 H hub, lacing 16 spokes on the DS and 8 on the NDS but the result is less than impressive as the holes on the NDS don't fall bang on in the middle of those on the DS... the all construction looks a bit odd to be honest.left the forum March 20230 -
RPD Steve wrote:If you laced a wheel to be radial on the drive side and with x on the other then all the torque would need to be transmitted via the hub. There is not 'much' flex in a hub, but there is some, and it makes sense to remove all unnecessary forces and stresses where possible- it can only help.
I have a back wheel laced exactly like that - seems to work quite well.0 -
I built my CX wheels radial DS and 2x NDS - mainly because I had enough CX Ray spokes of the right length for radial. Plenty of discussion of spoke patterns on weight weenies - as the hub is torsionally pretty rigid, then it doesn't really matter which side is laced radially.Make mine an Italian, with Campagnolo on the side..0