Who agrees with Brailsfords recent comments?

rob churchill

vs wrote:

It's just not plausible for Sky to have all past misdemeanors in the open.

Just as it's not plausible that Wiggins, and let's not forget, from nowhere in terms of grand tour riding, was the only non-doper in the 2009 TdF top 6.

1 Alberto Contador (ESP)
2 Andy Schleck (LUX)
DSQ Lance Armstrong (USA)
3 Bradley Wiggins (GBR)
4 Fränk Schleck (LUX)
5 Andreas Klöden (GER)

Not plausible for a non-doper to come fourth? so tell us, exactly how far down the rankings do you think we have to go before it's 'plausible' for someone to be a non-doper, and how did you arrive at this figure?

LutherB

I don't agree with him. I can only look at it from a fans perspective, and maybe that's where i'm going wrong in understanding it his statement.

I want to know who's robbed the bank, every damned last one of them, and how they did it. He might think there's nothing to be gained from this in his view, but as a fan i want all the rumours and all the conspiracy theories put to rest. I'm tired of it, some of the riders sound tired of it and unless they're just paying lip service then cycling needs to come clean otherwise stop yanking our chain and shut up because you're all taking the piss.

Peoples trust in cycling has been lost from the top to the bottom because we don't know who has robbed the bank and who helped them but there's no money in the bank, big holes in the wall and lot's of tunnels underneath and it's looking like an inside job. What's happened at the bank?!

I know i'm naive, no-one's gonna fess up. I just blame them for giving me a sport i love and care about and i want them to show that they feel the same.

Trev The Rev

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/others ... owers.html

Sir Dave Brailsford says Team Sky are opposed to cycling’s proposed “truth and reconciliation” commission aimed at revealing the full extent of the sport’s doping epidemic. “Telling the truth doesn’t make it better,” Brailsford said.


So why doesn't Brailsford want a truth and reconciliation commission? Telling the truth does make it better. We need the truth so we can best decide the way forward.

slim_boy_fat

Trev The Rev wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/9828392/Team-Skys-Dave-Brailsford-angered-by-UCI-plan-to-offer-amnesty-to-doping-whistle-blowers.html

Sir Dave Brailsford says Team Sky are opposed to cycling’s proposed “truth and reconciliation” commission aimed at revealing the full extent of the sport’s doping epidemic. “Telling the truth doesn’t make it better,” Brailsford said.


So why doesn't Brailsford want a truth and reconciliation commission? Telling the truth does make it better. We need the truth so we can best decide the way forward.

This is why, from the same article.

“There is this idea that if everyone tells the truth it will make it all better. No it won’t,” Brailsford, the Team Sky principal, said.
“Telling the truth doesn’t make it better. It’s about acting on the information that you find and doing something tangible with that information to make sure it doesn’t happen in the future.
“This idea of everyone telling the truth and it all goes into a pot, is it going to change anything? If it is about trying to identify all the individuals who were involved only to say, ‘OK you’re off the hook’, then what have you learned?”

You really are one of the worst Trolls I have ever seen.

nicklouse

Trev you are now just trolling.

Bye Bye.