Why is this not a fantastic idea? (Tyre technology)
coopster_the_1st
Posts: 5,158
http://www.chopmtb.com/2012/10/26/airless-tyres-what-will-they-think-of-next-check-out-the-weird-looking-energy-return-wheel/
Even though these are mtb tyres, I cannot see why they would not be a fantastic idea for tyres
Can anyone on here see problems?
They can cover the holes with thin plastic to stop water debris getting into the tyres but apart from that, this seems inspired to me
Even though these are mtb tyres, I cannot see why they would not be a fantastic idea for tyres
Can anyone on here see problems?
They can cover the holes with thin plastic to stop water debris getting into the tyres but apart from that, this seems inspired to me
0
Comments
-
Weight?0
-
weight, fill with mud, non adjustable pressure?0
-
iPete wrote:weight, fill with mud, non adjustable pressure?
Weight is claimed to be lightweight
thin sidewall apparently is being thought about to keep mud etc out.
Pressure is ajustable.0 -
This is even better:
I used to just ride my bike to work but now I find myself going out looking for bigger and bigger hills.0 -
As I understand it the great benefit of pneumatic tyres is that the whole volume of air inside the tyre acts as a shock absorber. Whereas those tyres only provide absorption at the point of contact.
Sheldon explains it far better than I ever could:
http://sheldonbrown.com/gloss_aa-l.html#airless
That article refers to "airless" foam tyres but I think the basic principle is the same.
PPPeople that make generalisations are all morons.
Target free since 2011.0 -
Cost.
There were some proof of concept versions for cars several years ago. The idea being that one could simply replace the tread from time to time. I can't imagine that they are easier or cheaper to build than tyres.
Weight.
I don't believe that they could be as light as a bicycle tyre, particularly with the adjustment hardware. What is "lightweight" compared to?
The Sheldon Brown article doesn't apply. The airless tyres of the general type shown derive their properties from the materials of their construction, not compression of air bubbles in foam. There's no particular reason why they couldn't remain within a fairly linear elastic region during use, and so mimic a pneumatic tyre.0 -
Imagine Wiggle trying to get that through your postbox.
As for weight, take away your puncture repair kit/pimp etc and balance would be restored. Rotational weight would become a factor though.
Adjustable pressure? Yeah right. Surely I'm not the only person who knocks a few psi off my tyres after rain. Don't need much of a toolkit for this atm.
I know a sidewall would cure it but I reckon it'd whistle at a higher speed. What effect will the sidewall have on the weight?The only disability in life is a poor attitude.0 -
I agree that unless you have a tandem, a pimp is just going to add unecessary weight.
0