Grammar Matters?

RonB
RonB Posts: 3,984
edited October 2012 in The cake stop
Edit...insert image probs, nothing to see here :oops:

Comments

  • Bugger the grammar. Explain the capitalisation of the thread topic first, then we'll talk.
    Mangeur
  • GiantMike
    GiantMike Posts: 3,139
    RonB wrote:
    Edit...insert image probs, nothing to see here :oops:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    Here's some plankton:

    220px-Hyperia.jpg

    and a drawing of a Mammoth:

    mammoth.jpeg

    I wonder how many plankton you could fit in the space of a mammoth*?
    * the images are not to scale

    Hope that helps.
  • schweiz
    schweiz Posts: 1,644
    The images are to scale, not the same scale, but nevertheless they are to scale!
  • big_p
    big_p Posts: 565
    what this thread need's is a picture of a rabbit with a pancake on it's head......

    rabbit_pancake.gif
  • GiantMike
    GiantMike Posts: 3,139
    schweiz wrote:
    The images are to scale, not the same scale, but nevertheless they are to scale!

    How do you know? Either image could have been skewed on one axis or even have been 'unscaled' by the poster. And, as you haven't seen either a Mammoth or a plankton, you have no reference point to make such an outlandish claim.

    I think your comment should have read:

    The images are to a scale, everything is to a scale of some sort. It's impossible to determine what scaling has been applied without a copy of the original image or reference to the original subject. And as one of them is an artists impression, that's going to be quite hard.

    Oh yeah, and I challenge you to a duel! Choose you weapon. I'm going for one of these*....

    _D-lock.jpg
    This image may not be to scale. It's impossible to determine what scaling has been applied without a copy of the original image or reference to the original subject.
  • GiantMike
    GiantMike Posts: 3,139
    OMG. I tried to find a better pet/pancake pic and I stumbled upon this website

    NSFW if you work in an animal sanctuary.
  • big_p
    big_p Posts: 565
    shish kebab and baguette dog are my favored pictures in that link.
  • GiantMike
    GiantMike Posts: 3,139
    tumblr_m2hjfbUlCd1r98oo7o1_500.jpg

    Sausage Dog!
  • nweststeyn
    nweststeyn Posts: 1,574
    Imagine if every human used the willpower it requires to keep up a blog like that to do something good in the world!
  • schweiz
    schweiz Posts: 1,644
    GiantMike wrote:
    And, as you haven't seen either a Mammoth or a plankton, you have no reference point to make such an outlandish claim.
    I'll have you know that I've seen a mammoth at the Natural History Museum and a Plankton on both a microscope slide and on telly :lol:

    GiantMike wrote:
    Oh yeah, and I challenge you to a duel! Choose you weapon. I'm going for one of these*....

    _D-lock.jpg

    well I'll put my faith in:

    7117-mid.jpg

    originally drawn at a scale of 1:5
  • RonB
    RonB Posts: 3,984
    Seems a shame to spoil this by getting back on thread but here goes...

    8100689258_e1309713be_b.jpg
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,363
    schweiz wrote:
    The images are to scale, not the same scale, but nevertheless they are to scale!
    Two scales?
    1557362-715485-two-designed-scale-weight.jpg
    Grammar does matter.
  • Jehannum
    Jehannum Posts: 107
    GiantMike wrote:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    If nothing else, grammar ought to teach us not to add apostrophe's to plural's.

    ;-)
    Reduce your carbon footprint - ride a metal bike!
  • bompington
    bompington Posts: 7,674
    Jehannum wrote:
    GiantMike wrote:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    If nothing else, grammar ought to teach us not to add apostrophe's to plural's.

    ;-)
    It should also teach u's that "like's" in this context i's the third person singular form of a verb, not a plural.
  • GiantMike
    GiantMike Posts: 3,139
    bompington wrote:
    Jehannum wrote:
    GiantMike wrote:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    If nothing else, grammar ought to teach us not to add apostrophe's to plural's.

    ;-)
    It should also teach u's that "like's" in this context i's the third person singular form of a verb, not a plural.

    At home I have a gun. I got it in case there was ever a revolution and the country degraded in anarchy and I needed to protect my bum from my dodgy neighbour. Having seen my unacceptable apostrophical error I have no option than to turn the gun on myself.

    Goodbye cruel (but grammatically correct) world.
  • RonB
    RonB Posts: 3,984
    Great stuff, but I'm still working on "...how to make a difference".

    The forum seemed like just the right place to start, though I probably got the quotation convention wrong! :wink:
  • LiamW
    LiamW Posts: 358
    GiantMike wrote:
    RonB wrote:
    Edit...insert image probs, nothing to see here :oops:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    Here's some plankton:

    220px-Hyperia.jpg

    and a drawing of a Mammoth:

    mammoth.jpeg

    I wonder how many plankton you could fit in the space of a mammoth*?
    * the images are not to scale

    Hope that helps.


    I love the fact that you felt the need to explain that the images were not to scale.

    :mrgreen:
  • Jehannum
    Jehannum Posts: 107
    bompington wrote:
    Jehannum wrote:
    GiantMike wrote:

    Au contraire. Everybody like's an empty thread to fill up for the OP.

    If nothing else, grammar ought to teach us not to add apostrophe's to plural's.

    ;-)
    It should also teach u's that "like's" in this context i's the third person singular form of a verb, not a plural.

    I like's what you done their.

    :-)
    Reduce your carbon footprint - ride a metal bike!