Armstrongs lawyer on radio 5

kuota
kuota Posts: 19
edited October 2012 in Pro race
Said there were 27 people who had given evidence against Armstrong and he didnt accept their testomony. He would put them on a lie detector , as in the right hands with the best equipment the truth would come out. The interviewer said if that was the case, Armstrong would take the test and pass it. Armstrongs lawyer said it might happen in the future but when pressed said he'd gotta run!!!!!!

Comments

  • Gazzetta67
    Gazzetta67 Posts: 1,890
    I thought it was Boss Hogg from the Dukes of Hazzard 8)
  • meagain
    meagain Posts: 2,331
    Front page of Observer Sport has presumably got him spluttering...
    d.j.
    "Cancel my subscription to the resurrection."
  • ademort
    ademort Posts: 1,924
    Given the fact that Armstrong has so many contacts how do we know that the lie detector test will be accurate. Armstrong has brought himself down to such a level that nobody would believe anything he says anymore. Lance Armstrong has gone within one week from being well respected and admired throughout the world for his sporting achievements, his battle against cancer and his work with the livestrong fund to the biggest sporting cheat in the history of sport. He,s Finished.Anything he or his lawyer comes up with is only a feeble attempt at damage limitation. IMHO
    Ademort
    ademort
    Chinarello, record and Mavic Cosmic Sl
    Gazelle Vuelta , veloce
    Giant Defy 4
    Mirage Columbus SL
    Batavus Ventura
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    Lie detectors don't work.

    You may as well read tea leaves
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,259
    It was just Gary Richardson fishing for a story to get on to the 9.30 sports bulletin. He's been doing the same schtick on Sunday mornings for years. I wouldn't take it too seriously.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,660
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6CPPema0QY
    _
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,259
    I still haven't really got past thinking that his lawyer is Tim Henman yet.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • RoadPainter
    RoadPainter Posts: 375
    RichN95 wrote:
    I still haven't really got past thinking that his lawyer is Tim Henman yet.
    +1
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    kuota wrote:
    as in the right hands with the best equipment the truth would come out

    As it would if it was Larry in the hot seat and all his 'witch hunters' at the helm of the lie detector (assuming he were to fail it)
  • Walter White
    Walter White Posts: 238
    RichN95 wrote:
    It was just Gary Richardson fishing for a story to get on to the 9.30 sports bulletin. He's been doing the same schtick on Sunday mornings for years. I wouldn't take it too seriously.

    An absolute cretin of a man.
  • TheBigBean
    TheBigBean Posts: 21,976
    iainf72 wrote:
    Lie detectors don't work.

    You may as well read tea leaves

    CAS accepted Contador's as evidence.....just saying.
  • heavymental
    heavymental Posts: 2,094
    Haha. Just read the article on the BBC site. Absolutely ridiculous!
  • jawooga
    jawooga Posts: 530
    Walter White wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    It was just Gary Richardson fishing for a story to get on to the 9.30 sports bulletin. He's been doing the same schtick on Sunday mornings for years. I wouldn't take it too seriously.

    An absolute cretin of a man.

    :D I remember him interviewing George Foreman before a televised boxing fight - it could have been Lewis vs Rahman. Anyway, he managed to spin an octagenarian Foreman 360 degrees in 30 seconds while working out where the camera was, and halfway through a response to a question. BBCs closest thing to Alan Partridge!
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,259
    jawooga wrote:
    :D I remember him interviewing George Foreman before a televised boxing fight - it could have been Lewis vs Rahman. Anyway, he managed to spin an octagenarian Foreman 360 degrees in 30 seconds while working out where the camera was, and halfway through a response to a question. BBCs closest thing to Alan Partridge!

    I'm not sure Foreman (currently 64) would appreciate that description.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • Mikey23
    Mikey23 Posts: 5,306
    One of those livestrong lie detectors with the nice yellow logo on the side I presume ...
  • thomthom
    thomthom Posts: 3,574
    Mikey23 wrote:
    One of those livestrong lie detectors with the nice yellow logo on the side I presume ...

    You are not suggesting that Lance would somehow manipulate a test, do you?!
  • andy_wrx
    andy_wrx Posts: 3,396
    Perhaps if you wired it up to the mains before it was put on Lance...
  • confused@BR
    confused@BR Posts: 295
    There is a piece in the Grauniad today quoting this lawyer. Why it was thought apt to fill column inches with the speculations of Mr Armstrong's paid representative escapes me, he adds nothing to the debate about a former cyclist who has little or no connection with Britain. Perhaps it demonstrates that Mr A still enjoys contacts and influence in our media?
    'fool'
  • deejay
    deejay Posts: 3,138
    Heavymental wrote:
    Haha. Just read the article on the BBC site. Absolutely ridiculous!
    Well I don't go there (but was it Slater) since a few years ago I and many others got banned from the BBC 606 forum because I suggested (and they did too) that Lance couldn't produce the European Summer performances without drug taking.
    Organiser, National Championship 50 mile Time Trial 1972

Categories