Jimmy's come as a surprise?
OffTheBackAdam
Posts: 1,869
http://thisismyengland.blogspot.co.uk/2 ... t.html?m=1
Looks like Jerry knew about it 25 years ago! :shock:
Looks like Jerry knew about it 25 years ago! :shock:
Remember that you are an Englishman and thus have won first prize in the lottery of life.
0
Comments
-
I think that for most people over 40 years old the only surprise is that people are surprised.None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0
-
he was freaky - someone mentioned today john peel was involved - noooooo. Now Dave Lee Travis.....i mean anyone who calls themselves the hairy cornflake!!!The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
also to be fair sadowitz could pass as jimmys savilles love child.The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
just been on the news - Morph was involved.....he was a playdophileThe dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
I heard Beadle may have had a small hand in it all.....0
-
0
-
Cleat Eastwood wrote:he was freaky - someone mentioned today john peel was involved - noooooo.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ir-DJ.html
Sounds 'consensual' to me, and -lets face it- she eventually wound up as a Playboy bunny girl.
Cynical chequebook journalism.You're the light wiping out my batteries; You're the cream in my airport coffee's.0 -
"Sounds 'consensual' to me" rather sums up how 'Sir Jimmy' could last so long. If you are 15 you cannot give consent. It is criminal behaviour and the adult is responsible.'fool'0
-
confused@BR wrote:"Sounds 'consensual' to me" rather sums up how 'Sir Jimmy' could last so long. If you are 15 you cannot give consent. It is criminal behaviour and the adult is responsible.
What about Mandy Smith and Bill Wyman then?
That was consensual, and she was 14.
Don't recall Wyman getting nicked for it.
And don't compare Peel with Savile either. Twat.You're the light wiping out my batteries; You're the cream in my airport coffee's.0 -
evil_breakfast wrote:confused@BR wrote:"Sounds 'consensual' to me" rather sums up how 'Sir Jimmy' could last so long. If you are 15 you cannot give consent. It is criminal behaviour and the adult is responsible.
What about Mandy Smith and Bill Wyman then?
That was consensual, and she was 14.
Don't recall Wyman getting nicked for it.
And don't compare Peel with Savile either. fool.
I don't think confused@BR was comparing Peel with Savile, merely stating, quite correctly, that a 15 year old girl cannot give 'consent' in the eyes of the law. That's why we call 16 years old the 'Age of Consent'.
Attitudes to this type of thing have, thankfully, changed radically over the past twenty years or so. I suspect there would be a different reaction to the Wyman/Mandy Smith thing today, rather than the 'Tut - Dirty old man!' tabloid smirking of the eighties.0 -
A very good friend of mine heard about his "activites" over 40 years ago when he worked for the BBC, he had no direct contact or proof of what was going on, but it was known about, (apparently) nothing was done as it was supposedly said by JS, "it would mean the end of any fund raising for Stoke Mandeville and other places."Cube Peloton Pro.
Genesis Core 30.0 -
Over 40 accusations but not a single one raised when he was alive. Watsallthaaboot?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it; but why was nothing raised by the victims when he was alive? Seems odd..Cube Hanzz Pro FRSquarepants wrote:It's not that I'm over over biked, my bike is under personed...0 -
Squarepants wrote:Over 40 accusations but not a single one raised when he was alive. Watsallthaaboot?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it; but why was nothing raised by the victims when he was alive? Seems odd..
Thats a valid point.
When watching the ITV documentary, what I found odd was how did the "victims" ended up being there in the first place? In an unlocked dressing room or even ending up at a hotel? What was to stop them from walking off?"The Prince of Wales is now the King of France" - Calton Kirby0 -
Squarepants wrote:Over 40 accusations but not a single one raised when he was alive. Watsallthaaboot?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it; but why was nothing raised by the victims when he was alive? Seems odd..
E.g. "no one will believe you" "he raises millions for charity and you'll end that fundraising" etc etc
With physical abuse there's usually psychological/emotional abuse.
That's probably why he (and others) got/get away with it.If suffer we must, let's suffer on the heights. (Victor Hugo).0 -
Although I think she acts a bit holier-than-thou, Esther Ranzen outlined the ironical hypocracy in all this. She basically said that it was the media that covered it up by holding Saville in high regard. The media knew what was going on and now its the media who are playing it out in all its vicarious glory.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0
-
Squarepants wrote:Over 40 accusations but not a single one raised when he was alive. Watsallthaaboot?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it; but why was nothing raised by the victims when he was alive? Seems odd..
With you on this one and I'm not going to make comparisons about the similarities between JS and acne...
Love n hugs
DD0 -
zippypablo wrote:Squarepants wrote:Over 40 accusations but not a single one raised when he was alive. Watsallthaaboot?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it; but why was nothing raised by the victims when he was alive? Seems odd..
E.g. "no one will believe you" "he raises millions for charity and you'll end that fundraising" etc etc
With physical abuse there's usually psychological/emotional abuse.
That's probably why he (and others) got/get away with it.
I understand the premise (and totally agree with most of it) however that theory would be predicated on all the alleged victims keeping quiet for the quoted reasons. I believe the toll is past 60 now and I find it strange that all 60 would remain unanimously silent. I totally agree with the psychological factors and I'm in no way qualified to comment on the particulars. Surely some of the individuals would have come forward regardless of extenuating curcumstances; JS was out of the lime light for quite some years..
Will it turn out to be another MJ scenario?Cube Hanzz Pro FRSquarepants wrote:It's not that I'm over over biked, my bike is under personed...0 -
People did come forwards - but either the people they told didn't want to know, the police investigations went nowhere or the newspapers decided not to publish.
it's a hard life if you don't weaken.0 -
For shame..Cube Hanzz Pro FRSquarepants wrote:It's not that I'm over over biked, my bike is under personed...0
-
I'm fairly sure that Jimmy coming was a suprise for most people.
I'll close the door on my way out..............None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0