Hilly or not?
badly_dubbed
Posts: 1,350
Would you class 8400ft (2560m) of climbing over 75 miles hilly?
Just a general question as I'm back on my training but not sure if that's what others class as a hilly run?
Just a general question as I'm back on my training but not sure if that's what others class as a hilly run?
0
Comments
-
That's like climbing up the Galibier of course its hilly0
-
Depends, if it was 75 miles of 100ft up followed by 100ft down, then probably not (that would be undulating), but if the climbing came in a few big lumps then most definitely!0
-
4 pretty decent climbs on that particular loop
Wasn't really site if it was considered hilly enough but question answered0 -
There's some general agreement that 100ft or more of elevation gain per mile is a hilly ride. So yes, hilly.0
-
Bordersroadie wrote:There's some general agreement that 100ft or more of elevation gain per mile is a hilly ride. So yes, hilly.
^ This.0 -
Sounds hilly to me.0
-
-
Bordersroadie wrote:There's some general agreement that 100ft or more of elevation gain per mile is a hilly ride. So yes, hilly.Scott Sportster P45 2008 | Cannondale CAAD8 Tiagra 20120
-
Bordersroadie wrote:There's some general agreement that 100ft or more of elevation gain per mile is a hilly ride. So yes, hilly.
That sounds about right to me, so a 1000m elevation gain for a 33 mile ride. That would be quite hilly.WyndyMilla Massive Attack | Rourke 953 | Condor Italia 531 Pro | Boardman CX Pro | DT Swiss RR440 Tubeless Wheels
Find me on Strava0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:Show off.
This.English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg0 -
Well done!
I did 65 miles today, with 1800m climbing, and I thought that was good!!0 -
no - 4200m over 130km is hilly....
;-)Your Past is Not Your Potential...0 -
badly_dubbed wrote:Would you class 8400ft (2560m) of climbing over 75 miles hilly?
Nope.
Mountainous :shock:"You really think you can burn off sugar with exercise?" downhill paul0 -
Under 1% (1000m per 100km) = flat
Between 1 and 1.25% (1250m per 100km) = rolling
Between 1.25 and 1.5% (1500m per 100km) = lumpy
Between 1.5 and 2% (2000m per 100km) = hilly
Over 2% = approach with caution
The 100ft per mile is about 1.8%, so I'd say that's hilly for sure.
I'd call 2560m over 120km (from original question) a hilly ride for sure - over 2% - where was that?
As has been mentioned above, there are different ways of making up that ascent - constant up and down hills or a handful of larger climbs. I personally find the rolling up and down hills far more tiring - anything along coastlines etc. can become very hard work as the day goes on, especially when compared to a couple of larger climbs when you can focus your effort and recover much more easily.
@bigpikle 4200m over 130km is very hilly - where's that?0 -
the Maratona - tough day in July at 35 degrees as wellYour Past is Not Your Potential...0
-
marcusjb wrote:Under 1% (1000m per 100km) = flat
Between 1 and 1.25% (1250m per 100km) = rolling
Between 1.25 and 1.5% (1500m per 1000km) = lumpy
Between 1.5 and 2% (2000m per 100km) = hilly
Over 2% = approach with caution
The 100ft per mile is about 1.8%, so I'd say that's hilly for sure.
I'd call 2560m over 120km (from original question) a hilly ride for sure - over 2% - where was that?
As has been mentioned above, there are different ways of making up that ascent - constant up and down hills or a handful of larger climbs. I personally find the rolling up and down hills far more tiring - anything along coastlines etc. can become very hard work as the day goes on, especially when compared to a couple of larger climbs when you can focus your effort and recover much more easily.
@bigpikle 4200m over 130km is very hilly - where's that?
Fife and branching into Perth and Kinross.
Glentarkie, dunning glen, glenfarg, dron, Kinross, Newburgh and surrounding areas0 -
sounds a rather nice ride out!Your Past is Not Your Potential...0
-
badly_dubbed wrote:marcusjb wrote:Under 1% (1000m per 100km) = flat
Between 1 and 1.25% (1250m per 100km) = rolling
Between 1.25 and 1.5% (1500m per 1000km) = lumpy
Between 1.5 and 2% (2000m per 100km) = hilly
Over 2% = approach with caution
The 100ft per mile is about 1.8%, so I'd say that's hilly for sure.
I'd call 2560m over 120km (from original question) a hilly ride for sure - over 2% - where was that?
As has been mentioned above, there are different ways of making up that ascent - constant up and down hills or a handful of larger climbs. I personally find the rolling up and down hills far more tiring - anything along coastlines etc. can become very hard work as the day goes on, especially when compared to a couple of larger climbs when you can focus your effort and recover much more easily.
@bigpikle 4200m over 130km is very hilly - where's that?
Fife and branching into Perth and Kinross.
Glentarkie, dunning glen, glenfarg, dron, Kinross, Newburgh and surrounding areas
Certainly hilly that way - 1st day of the recent Mille Alba 1000km event took us around that way - Edinburgh, Aberargie, Forfar, Banchory, Braemar, Perth, Edinburgh - it was a pretty hilly day, Cairn O'Mount and Glenshee.
You live in beautiful cycling country!0