Rolland...

esafosfina
esafosfina Posts: 131
edited July 2012 in Pro race
Ok, just seeing what the general consensus is to Rolland's actions on today's stage... I know if he did that when I was racing he'd be thoroughly shunned by the peloton... (and abused to hell!). For what it's worth, it was the worst thing he could have ever done... the peloton have long memories!
«1

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,667
    Peloton probably wont forget, especially over a 3 week race. Mind you, I think he did start slowing down after team told him to.

    If it was a 1 day (or amateur race), I'd say go for it.

    Someone said "if I hear a crash in my (3/4th cat) race, I take it as a sign to dig in a make a break". Good way of looking at it
  • Yellow Peril
    Yellow Peril Posts: 4,466
    Fuuny old game cycle racing. It isn't just a matter of being the first from A-B it's the manner in which you do it and the subjectivity attached to your fortune or misfortune along the way. One man's Contador moment is another's Cancellara if you get what I mean.
    @JaunePeril

    Winner of the Bike Radar Pro Race Wiggins Hour Prediction Competition
  • Rundfahrt
    Rundfahrt Posts: 551
    esafosfina wrote:
    Ok, just seeing what the general consensus is to Rolland's actions on today's stage... I know if he did that when I was racing he'd be thoroughly shunned by the peloton... (and abused to hell!). For what it's worth, it was the worst thing he could have ever done... the peloton have long memories!


    It's the worst thing he could have ever done? Hyperbole.
  • provoked
    provoked Posts: 3
    Rundfahrt wrote:
    esafosfina wrote:
    Ok, just seeing what the general consensus is to Rolland's actions on today's stage... I know if he did that when I was racing he'd be thoroughly shunned by the peloton... (and abused to hell!). For what it's worth, it was the worst thing he could have ever done... the peloton have long memories!


    It's the worst thing he could have ever done? Hyperbole.

    God, you really are just so unpleasant, aren't you?
  • luckao
    luckao Posts: 632
    Didn't Rolland ease up? It was a bit of a pointless move in the first place. Whatever was going on behind, he wouldn't have got away to earn any significant time.
  • CambsNewbie
    CambsNewbie Posts: 564
    The commentators kept saying Europcar already have a bad reputation in the peleton. What have they done to piss everyone off?
  • Frank the tank
    Frank the tank Posts: 6,553
    Rolland is a rat. :lol::wink:
    Tail end Charlie

    The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.
  • Tom Butcher
    Tom Butcher Posts: 3,830
    He probably shouldn't have done it but if the peloton are going to hold a grudge over it then they want to grow up a bit.

    it's a hard life if you don't weaken.
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    The commentators kept saying Europcar already have a bad reputation in the peloton. What have they done to wee-wee everyone off?

    Generally not doing their fair share of work, attacking at inappropriate times. But I think most of that is transfered over from Tommy V's behaviour rather than the whole team
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • Yellow Peril
    Yellow Peril Posts: 4,466
    iainf72 wrote:
    The commentators kept saying Europcar already have a bad reputation in the peloton. What have they done to wee-wee everyone off?

    Generally not doing their fair share of work, attacking at inappropriate times. But I think most of that is transfered over from Tommy V's facial behaviour rather than the whole team

    FTFY :)
    @JaunePeril

    Winner of the Bike Radar Pro Race Wiggins Hour Prediction Competition
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    iainf72 wrote:
    The commentators kept saying Europcar already have a bad reputation in the peloton. What have they done to wee-wee everyone off?

    Generally not doing their fair share of work, attacking at inappropriate times. But I think most of that is transfered over from Tommy V's behaviour rather than the whole team

    Doesn't seem to stop them winning.
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784

    Doesn't seem to stop them winning.

    Europcar Postal.

    Allegedly.
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • Rundfahrt
    Rundfahrt Posts: 551
    Provoked wrote:
    Rundfahrt wrote:
    esafosfina wrote:
    Ok, just seeing what the general consensus is to Rolland's actions on today's stage... I know if he did that when I was racing he'd be thoroughly shunned by the peloton... (and abused to hell!). For what it's worth, it was the worst thing he could have ever done... the peloton have long memories!


    It's the worst thing he could have ever done? Hyperbole.

    God, you really are just so unpleasant, aren't you?

    Rather ironic considering your three posts here.
  • giropaul
    giropaul Posts: 414
    Rolland was totally out of order. There are clear "unwritten rules", and he broke them entirely to try to personally gain.

    I would imagine that he will be chased down every time he makes a move for a fair time to come.

    Wiggins, on the other hand, went from leader to patron. The really special thing, for me, was the "well done" from the race direction.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    In fairness to Rolland, he didn't gain a personal advantage since he slowed down.

    He had 45 seconds on the peloton, so it wasn't just he was chased down. He sat up too.

    And also, in fairness to him, he attacked long before we knew it was tacks on the road.

    All we knew is Evans had what looked like a comically bad puncture moment at the time. And is Rolland a rival to Evans? No. And given what happend on stage 6, he probably figured, if they don't wait for me, I'm also not important enough to have to wait for him.

    And all this Wiggins being gentlemanly - wasn't shutting the race down and neutralising it what sky were doing ALL DAY.

    I mean sure, let Evans get back and don't exploit it, but it wasn't like they were giving up a potentially race winning move to be sporting. It suited them.
  • plectrum
    plectrum Posts: 225
    iainf72 wrote:

    Doesn't seem to stop them winning.

    Europcar Postal.

    Allegedly.

    Iain,

    Is this because after a rest day they are suddenly incredibly refreshed and dominant as if they've received overnight delivery from refridgerated panniered motobikes!
  • plectrum
    plectrum Posts: 225
    Rick,

    Let's be honest putting a further minute between Froome and Evans would be a good idea and it would have pretty much cemented Wiggins' tour so .... they did the honourable thing.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    plectrum wrote:
    Rick,

    Let's be honest putting a further minute between Froome and Evans would be a good idea and it would have pretty much cemented Wiggins' tour so .... they did the honourable thing.


    They'd never planned to do anything today.

    Evans is barely a challenger anymore. Nibali/Froome are the closest riders.

    This just suited their 'plan' - the ones they go on about so much anyway, and they come out with headlines like 'Wiggns le gentleman'.

    Let me put it this way. Had sky been slamming it on the final 2km before hand, splitting the peloton, and THEN it'd happened, there's no way they would have waited, just like they didn't wait for van den Broeck on that stage Froome won.
  • Squaggles
    Squaggles Posts: 875
    Rolland didn't do himself any favours there , I take it he feels hard done to from a previous stage but why make yourself unpopular

    I expected a bit more action fron the GC riders are they gambling everything on wednesdays stage ?
    The UCI are Clowns and Fools
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,434
    Had sky been slamming it on the final 2km before hand, splitting the peloton, and THEN it'd happened, there's no way they would have waited, just like they didn't wait for van den Broeck on that stage Froome won.

    Different scenario.

    No one would expect them to stop in that situation. In this case everyone had come over the top together.
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • MrTapir
    MrTapir Posts: 1,206
    Pierre says he was unaware of the situation that was developing and couldn't get any information over the radio. He also says that when the peloton came back he explained and they were ok about it afterwards.
  • rebs
    rebs Posts: 891
    As I've mentioned previously. No issue with what Rolland done but live by the sword die by the sword.

    His excuse is almost as good as TJVG's one for seeing Evans punture :P
  • alwaystoohot
    alwaystoohot Posts: 252
    Wiggo had 2 choices, gain 2 minutes and incurr the wrath of oficionados or simply make a gesture that would have to be returned - he's one day closer to home and hopefully has shut up the whinging media trying to link him with drugs. Win-win, well done Bradley. As for Rolland... what a dick.
    'I started with nothing and still have most of it left.'
  • milton50
    milton50 Posts: 3,856
    I agree that it suited Sky to shut the peloton down on the descent. Wiggins had a pretty perfect day. Not only was Nibali (or anyone else) stoppped from launching an attack but he's also hailed as a hero of the Tour.

    I think it was a pretty dumb move from Rolland. He's seriously trying to say that he saw the front of the peloton cruising down the descent at 1/3 of the normal speed, looking around, and he didn't think to ask what was going on? He just naturally assumed everthing was fine and gunned it? Come off it.
  • MrTapir
    MrTapir Posts: 1,206
    Milton50 wrote:
    I agree that it suited Sky to shut the peloton down on the descent. Wiggins had a pretty perfect day. Not only was Nibali (or anyone else) stoppped from launching an attack but he's also hailed as a hero of the Tour.

    I think it was a pretty dumb move from Rolland. He's seriously trying to say that he saw the front of the peloton cruising down the descent at 1/3 of the normal speed, looking around, and he didn't think to ask what was going on? He just naturally assumed everthing was fine and gunned it? Come off it.

    Well thats what he says. Or thats what Velonation says that he says.

    Hey Rebs, whats this about TJVG making excuses?
  • frenchfighter
    frenchfighter Posts: 30,642
    Rolland is a heavyweight. The Tour needs 25 more of him.

    His actions were not attacking due to tacks on the road, just because he has the legs and the spirit. Its a shame he had to sit up.

    In case you didnt read the article:

    If someone attacks a puncture or a crash, I'd be the first to moan. Had I been aware of anything, I would have waited.
    Contador is the Greatest
  • Dorset_Boy
    Dorset_Boy Posts: 7,556
    So Europcar have crap radios do they Frenchie? And Rolland's eyesight is dodgy (might explain his poor descending!!). Very poor excuse from Rolland as it was obvious something was up, and someone in that group could have spoken french to him.

    TJVG just looked at Cuddles, then looked the other way and rode off! He was alongside Cuddles as Cuddles stopped!
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,695
    To be fair, TJ is the only person from BMC who will actually win something so I think that's the right decision! No point loosing the white jersey to protect 4th place...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • Tom Butcher
    Tom Butcher Posts: 3,830
    To be fair to Rolland the situation earlier in the Tour when several outside favourites lost time and sprinters lost chances because of that mass pile up wasn't a lot different to yesterday and nobody slowed down then.

    I'm sure he just thought Evans had punctured and didn't see that as a reason not to carry out what may have been a planned attack on that descent anyway - at that stage it wasn't clear there had been deliberate sabotage. He may have calculated Sky wouldn't chase him and other teams wouldn't have the numbers up there to do so.

    It's not as if Evans is the yellow jersey he's in 4th place - how far down the GC are you expected to wait for people ?

    it's a hard life if you don't weaken.