Rockshox 2013
Comments
-
Should have said the naming game instead SS.
I swear they just set out to confuse through all their permutations.
Edit.. And agree with Yeehaa at the top of the page. It just won't happen, as it is the way of the World0 -
No idea why they need so many budget forks - well I do TBH, it's to slot perfectly into very narrow budgets of the cheap OE market, but seems too many after market.
As for naming, RL is just daft.0 -
According to that site, the Recon RL and TK are the same price and both have MoCo?
I agree that the names are stupid.0 -
Must be a mistake somewhere, as only the Recon RL is moco - the TK is the Turnkey damper. But basic moco has compression adjust, so RL is doing it an injustice! The Revelation and SID RL get adjustable floodgate and dual flow rebound, (at least in 2012), so RL means something else here too.0
-
What in god's name is dual flow rebound?
I've never understood the need for high and low-speed rebound.0 -
YeehaaMcgee wrote:mrmonkfinger wrote:YeehaaMcgee wrote:There's something that bugs me with things like this...
Why do forks have to be changed every year, rather than when a genuine improvement has been made. I'm pretty sure that keeping the same thing in production for longer would lower costs.
two words: orange five
<runs>
No idea if they're on an annual release schedule though.
I know that recently orange decided that all their 5s need the maxle rear end, before it was an option to upgrade to. Price is £100 extra, so £1500 for the frame, had a knock on on the entry level 5 as now it "needs" hope hubs (on some low end rims too), so pushed their price up even further :roll:
I might just being an arse but I just think it's ludicrous, it's the same bike, they've just decided to charge £100 extra for a rear that's got some holes in it instead of dropouts... not sure if it's a 142 or 135mm system they've opted for but still, I don't think it justifies that price rise, it can't be costing them that much more. Particularly on a frame that a year ago was £200 cheaper than it is now and the only change they made was the addition of an extra set of cable routes for a dropper post.
I dislike orange as a company, mostly because of their prices and stupid specs (I mean a £2400 bike with a QR Sektor up front for instance), which is a shame because I quite like the bikes (well riding them, not looking at them )
Anyway, back on topic, I think it's a shame RS dropped the dual air system, I like it, I know it takes a while to get used to and set up but now I'm at a stage where I know exactly what pressure balances I want. If I feel like having a bit firmer ride, or a bit of a softer start to the stroke I can just whack a shock pump on the negative chamber before I set off and 10 seconds later have the fork set to how I fancy. Having said that let's see how these new forks stack up when the magazines and more importantly real people get hold of them.0 -
Just when I'd got my head around last years range! Looks like there names are as misleading as BMW's badges!0
-
Angry Bird wrote:YeehaaMcgee wrote:mrmonkfinger wrote:YeehaaMcgee wrote:There's something that bugs me with things like this...
Why do forks have to be changed every year, rather than when a genuine improvement has been made. I'm pretty sure that keeping the same thing in production for longer would lower costs.
two words: orange five
<runs>
No idea if they're on an annual release schedule though.
I know that recently orange decided that all their 5s need the maxle rear end, before it was an option to upgrade to. Price is £100 extra, so £1500 for the frame, had a knock on on the entry level 5 as now it "needs" hope hubs (on some low end rims too), so pushed their price up even further :roll:
I might just being an ars* but I just think it's ludicrous, it's the same bike, they've just decided to charge £100 extra for a rear that's got some holes in it instead of dropouts... not sure if it's a 142 or 135mm system they've opted for but still, I don't think it justifies that price rise, it can't be costing them that much more. Particularly on a frame that a year ago was £200 cheaper than it is now and the only change they made was the addition of an extra set of cable routes for a dropper post.
I dislike orange as a company, mostly because of their prices and stupid specs (I mean a £2400 bike with a QR Sektor up front for instance), which is a shame because I quite like the bikes (well riding them, not looking at them )
Anyway, back on topic, I think it's a shame RS dropped the dual air system, I like it, I know it takes a while to get used to and set up but now I'm at a stage where I know exactly what pressure balances I want. If I feel like having a bit firmer ride, or a bit of a softer start to the stroke I can just whack a shock pump on the negative chamber before I set off and 10 seconds later have the fork set to how I fancy. Having said that let's see how these new forks stack up when the magazines and more importantly real people get hold of them.
Just looking at the orange website, how the fark does the five gold limited edition with the same maxle swingarm option, is £100 cheaper than the pro, but gets far superior Fox factory fork and shock over the rl's of the pro, but gets elixer 5's and formula hubs... there is no way that some pro2's and tech brakes are worth the extra over the the five gold which has by far the better spec imo. The pricing of some bikes these days is just stupid0 -
Angry Bird wrote:[Orange 5...] £1500 for the frame0
-
YeehaaMcgee wrote:Angry Bird wrote:[Orange 5...] £1500 for the frame
tick all the options on a five se and your looking at the best part of £6k...0 -
Dual flow rebound - are two versions, one with fixed deep stroke rebound, adjustable end stroke, the other both externally adjustable. Just more options, some like a slower big hit feel, but fast over the chattery stuff.0
-
-
That;'s the one!0
-
supersonic wrote:some like a slower big hit feel, but fast over the chattery stuff.
just thought is that not what motion control is for? not that i think i have that either..opinions are worth exactly what you pay for them ;-)
2012 boardman team F/S tarting has begun..
1992 cannondale m1000 still going just0 -
In this particular context, Sonic was referring to different rebound speeds depending on the size of the impact.
So, if you've just landed a big drop, and bottomed out the suspension, you want it to re-extend a bit slower, so it doesn't throw you off - But if it's a small bump, you want the rebound to be pretty fast, so that the fork is extended again for the next hit.0 -
yep thats what i want! can i do it with my fork or do i need a new one? if so a 2011fork sounds better than the new onesopinions are worth exactly what you pay for them ;-)
2012 boardman team F/S tarting has begun..
1992 cannondale m1000 still going just0 -
very few forks do it, and whilst I'd say it's probably of some advantage, it will be hardly noticeable in practice.0
-
YeehaaMcgee wrote:very few forks do it, and whilst I'd say it's probably of some advantage, it will be hardly noticeable in practice.
IIRC all of rockshox's high end 2012 trail forks(reba, revelation) and above(lyric etc) had a version of dual flow where the small hit rebound is externally adjustable at the bottom of the leg and the big hit is factory set. If you want both to be adjustable, you need a boxxer, but this is obviously not suitable for your frame.
TF tuned or similar could probably adjust the factory set big hit on the other forks though.0 -
Dual Air hasn't been dropped, it is an option on eg Revs, the Bikeradar report describes this and if you look at the air pressures chart for 2013 on the SRAM site the solo air/dual air options are listed clearly.
All I ever did with Dual Air was try to get the pressures the same anyway, so solo air welcome here.0 -
-
I've yet to see any dual air options though. None here:
http://www.sussedoutsuspension.co.uk/20 ... oducts.pdf0 -
Have RS dropped blackbox damping from the reba for 2013?
(searching 'rockshox' and 'supersonic' found thread pretty quick lol, sorry for the resurrection)0 -
-
Well that sucks! I always thought the Reba was the xc forks for fat blokes... Heavier, but less flex than a sid but with BB damping.
Moco is good, but BB is superb.0 -
-
The Reba has the same chassis as the 120mm SID now - the SID gets lighter internals and more choice of dampers. They can be got with 15mm Maxle.0
-
The Northern Monkey wrote:Well that sucks! I always thought the Reba was the xc forks for fat blokes
No, the Reba is the short travel AM fork for slim blokes in the Alps"Why have that extra tooth if you're not using it?" - Brian Lopes
Votec V.SX Enduro 'Alpine Thug' 2012/2013 build
Trek Session 80 -
hehehe...
Whats all this DNA stuff then? I have seen it but no idea what it is?
The difference between the rev team and rev race was really noticeable! BB is well worth the extra ££ IMO.0 -
DNA is a lighter damper tube. But in typical RS fashion is more than one version...
http://www.sram.com/rockshox/technologi ... ontrol-dna
Reba doesn't get it ir Reba RL and SID RL are two different dampers.0 -
Always found dual air frustrating, brilliant for those who love to fettle their fork at the start of each different trail though.0