Strava faces lawsuit after death
napoleond
Posts: 5,992
Comments
-
Strava is useless. People keep stealing my KOMS. Strava know about this and do nothing about it. Theft is theft.0
-
ddraver wrote:As I said in there - what the Fu*k is wrong with Americans?!
(well I tidied it up for INRG but this is the new hardcore BB....)
This Country is heading the same wayNone of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
-
i'm surprised there arent more deaths due to heart attacks amongst the mamils - haha and i include myself in that- theres no such thing as a gentle bimble up a hill anymore.The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
If I was the King i'd bring in a law which jailed people for bringing about such stupid lawsuits. Waste of time and just desperation for money.Cycling prints
Band of Climbers0 -
daviesee wrote:ddraver wrote:As I said in there - what the Fu*k is wrong with Americans?!
(well I tidied it up for INRG but this is the new hardcore BB....)
This Country is heading the same way
Agree with daviesee.
The only "blame" lies with the deceased, even IF strava encouraged him to go faster/take more risks that is HIS decision. Where would the line be drawn if this case were to go against strava?Tail end Charlie
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.0 -
Frank the tank wrote:Agree with daviesee.
Example - My wife is a community nurse. At the weekend she slipped and fell on a patients wet polished tiled doorstep.
The patient had 2 immediate questions.
Is she okay?
She won't sue me, will she?
Sad, but that's the mind set todayNone of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
I'm surprised noone asked if he created the segment :?:0
-
I blame God for not making our bodies more crash resistant. Now that would be a lawsuit!0
-
CambsNewbie wrote:I blame God for not making our bodies more crash resistant. Now that would be a lawsuit!
Do you believe in god then?Tail end Charlie
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.0 -
Frank the tank wrote:CambsNewbie wrote:I blame God for not making our bodies more crash resistant. Now that would be a lawsuit!
Do you believe in god then?I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
Frank the tank wrote:CambsNewbie wrote:I blame God for not making our bodies more crash resistant. Now that would be a lawsuit!
Do you believe in god then?
I note your lack of a capital 'G' there!!!
And no I don't. Not religious at all, personally think religion has caused a huge amount of misery, suffering and death in this world.
Just being facetious.. Although I'm sure it's just a matter of time before someone (probably American) names God in a lawsuit.0 -
-
thegibdog wrote:Billy Connolly?0
-
New set of T&C in my inbox from Strava this morning-their lawyers are quick as well.Whats the solution? Just pedal faster you baby.
Summer B,man Team Carbon LE#222
Winter Alan Top Cross
All rounder Spec. Allez.0 -
I'm not on Strava so am asking genuine ignorant question and to play devils advicate.
Was it forseeable to owners of a site that effectively puts you in a speed competition with other riders (I know theres other ways of doing the same thing) that it might lead to some people taking it a step further than necessary and it going wrong? Hell yes, theres examples from way back when of people taking risks, cheating & pushing things beyond their limit and it going wrong when being measured against their peers.nevman wrote:New set of T&C in my inbox from Strava this morning-their lawyers are quick as well.
If they've retrospectively changed them and I was the suing lawyers, I'd be jumping for joy as I'd be arguing it is a pretty clear admission that Strava now accept their original ones weren't watertight and didn't go far enough to prevent stupidity.
They might have done better to put out a statement to users but wait on actually changing anything officially until the court ruling.
Did they make it explicit when our man signed up that at no time was anyone to break the local law, see it as a competition rather than a personal benchmark, ride beyond their capability, yaddy yaddy.
Does Strava tell you the category of each rider and their ride details? Would he have known if his segment time had been beaten by a one legged obese blind kid on a BMX with flat tyres in rush hour who got lucky or by Jens Voigt in full race spec doing descending practice on a quiet Sunday afternoon with spotters that he'd never in a million years be able to match?0 -
cooldad wrote:Frank the tank wrote:CambsNewbie wrote:I blame God for not making our bodies more crash resistant. Now that would be a lawsuit!
Do you believe in god then?
Although very briefly.
The older I get, the better I was.0 -
shouldbeinbed wrote:Lawyer stuff
All of the above can be summarised as don't be a d1ck and use your common sense. I did nt realise that needed enshrining in law...We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
its crazy that Strava should even be worried - dont you just wish a judge would throw the case out on day one and get the claimant to pay all costs - stupidity and vindictiveness by the family - I read elsewhere that it was the wife who bought him the garmin for a present? then she is implicated too!http://veloviewer.com/SigImage.php?a=3370a&r=3&c=5&u=M&g=p&f=abcdefghij&z=a.png
Wiliers: Cento Uno/Superleggera R and Zero 7. Bianchi Infinito CV and Oltre XR20 -
ddraver wrote:shouldbeinbed wrote:Lawyer stuff
All of the above can be summarised as don't be a d1ck and use your common sense. I did nt realise that needed enshrining in law...
I agree but unfortunately it does. theres been too many stupid compensation cases and too many Joe Pasquale voiced parasite lawyer ads for me to think common sense has any part to play in cases like this.0 -
ILM Zero7 wrote:<snip> I read elsewhere that it was the wife who bought him the garmin for a present? then she is implicated too!
Not really, it is a tracking/direction device, its not putting him into competition with other people in the way a Strava like site does.
If she'd doctored the garmin and he'd ridden off the edge of a cliff blindly following the wrong directions then spot on.
Yes it is a stupid case, yes it is his own fault he is dead, I'm sure the family didn't want to put 'here lies an over-competitive pillock' on his headstone and unless the bike was proven to be defective he simply rode it beyond his and its capabilities, but thats where common sense stops and the law starts.
The legal questions to be answered are if it wasn't for the competitive element of the Strava site would he have ridden it in the same manner which caused his death? and did Strava do enough to dissuade over-competitive pillocks from following that urge?0 -
shouldbeinbed wrote:The legal questions to be answered are if it wasn't for the competitive element of the Strava site would he have ridden it in the same manner which caused his death? and did Strava do enough to dissuade over-competitive pillocks from following that urge?
I'm not sure that's correct. If I said that I'd ridden along the A1 at 40mph and I bet nobody could beat me, do I then become responsible for everybody else's actions? Should I complete a H&S assessment before making such a claim? Should I only inform non-dicks of my achievement?
Is the BBC responsible for the head injuries of John Smith after he tried to break the world record for smashing roof tiles with his head? It was on Guinness Book of Records and was clearly an incitement for John to act like a dick.0 -
The tone is we're all agreeing and "common sense" should prevail but sadly all to often it doesn't, otherwise the ambulance chasing legal eagles would by now be extinct.
They ought to apply Darwins law the idiots death has just enriched the gene pool.Tail end Charlie
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.0 -
shouldbeinbed wrote:ILM Zero7 wrote:<snip> I read elsewhere that it was the wife who bought him the garmin for a present? then she is implicated too!0
-
shouldbeinbed wrote:Did they make it explicit when our man signed up that at no time was anyone to break the local law, see it as a competition rather than a personal benchmark, ride beyond their capability, yaddy yaddy.
Unfortunately this rider got it wrong when trying to pip the top time and died as a result.
What will it mean for Strava if they loose the case? Well, minimum will be a disclaimer that they're not responsible for your stupidty, next will be a ban on segments where you can go faster than the speed limit in force - which I suppose is fine if the limit applies to bicycles too ...0 -
There's a disclaimer when you turn strava on along the lines of behave, stick to the rules of the road and they don't take responsibility if you die whilst using it.0
-
Rick Chasey wrote:There's a disclaimer when you turn strava on along the lines of behave, stick to the rules of the road and they don't take responsibility if you die whilst using it.0