Space...
mudcow007
Posts: 3,861
Keeping it classy since '83
0
Comments
-
Good find!
We're not just tiny though, we're also massive compared to a charm quark.Ribble Audax - FCN 5
Dedacciai Pista - FCN 30 -
-
This sort of thing makes my girlfreinds head hurt..."If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always got."
PX Kaffenback 2 = Work Horse
B-Twin Alur 700 = Sundays and Hills0 -
mudcow007 wrote:
Or how big we are - taller than the Sun if you put us all end to end. In fact are we pretty much in the middle of the scale?
EDIT: No. The scale goes down to 10ˉ³⁵, but up to 10²⁷, so we are just into the 'big' half; the 'middle is at 10ˉ⁴.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
rjsterry wrote:
Presumably that's because we measure everything from our perspective?
So our size = normal. Anything else is either side?0 -
0
-
Rick Chasey wrote:rjsterry wrote:
Presumably that's because we measure everything from our perspective?
So our size = normal. Anything else is either side?
No, the smallest theoretical and largest observable lengths define the extents of the scale. The metre - x10¹ is not at the centre of that range. See my edit above.1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Part of the anti-growth coalition0 -
Very good. I remember one of the gas clouds (think it was the eagle nebula) being on the telly and asking my eldest how long she thought it would take to drive a car from top to bottom (assuming Spongebob Squarepants reality). She guessed about 100 years. I worked it out as something like 100 billion years.
Space doesn't fit in our brain does it ?0 -
What really bakes my noodle is that there is an information horizon thats smaller than the estimated size of the universe.0