My Venge HTC Di2

2»

Comments

  • p9uma
    p9uma Posts: 565
    sturmey wrote:
    Beatmaker wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?

    What a ridiculous thing to say :?
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?
    It's a bike, he can ride it as fast or slow as he wants, don't need to justify it to anyone. Stunning bike mate - enjoy
    gaddster wrote:
    Why should it? Are you the arbiter of who can have what bike?

    Great looking bike mate!


    take it you're all fat or slow or both then?

    Charming! I wonder if you would make such an unpleasant comment to their face?
    Trek Madone 3.5
    Whyte Coniston
    1970 Dawes Kingpin
  • p9uma
    p9uma Posts: 565
    Fantastic looking bike, how do get one with the Di2?
    Trek Madone 3.5
    Whyte Coniston
    1970 Dawes Kingpin
  • marshy01uk
    marshy01uk Posts: 378
    quangtt wrote:
    IMG_4383%20(33%20of%2034).jpg
    :)
    6,99kg with dura ace pedals and edge800

    That is one whoopass bike! I saw the Ltd edition all black one in Majorca last week in the flesh, its like the Doberman of bikes! Grrrr! :D
    Winter/Training: Trek 1.9
    TT: Planet X Stealth Pro with extra carbon bling!
    MTB: Trek Fuel EX6 + GIANT XTC 29er
    Race: LOOK 595
    Fixie: Dolan
    http://www.bmycharity.com/AberfeldyMidd ... eTriathlon
  • sturmey
    sturmey Posts: 964
    Flambes wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Beatmaker wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?

    What a ridiculous thing to say :?
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?
    It's a bike, he can ride it as fast or slow as he wants, don't need to justify it to anyone. Stunning bike mate - enjoy
    gaddster wrote:
    Why should it? Are you the arbiter of who can have what bike?

    Great looking bike mate!


    take it you're all fat or slow or both then?

    Take it you're poor and bitter or both then?

    I am neither of these in fact.

    I could happily afford to buy numerous bikes as expensive as this one but I never will. This is because I am not an elite level road racer nor,I suspect, is the OP,ipso facto the purchase of this bike would be a complete waste of my money.
    And despite earlier comments comparing bling bikes to flash sports cars there is,frankly, no analogy there.
    The high performance car can be made to travel at a competitively fast speed by anybody irrespective of their physical fitness. The bike can not.

    I realise this advice may not be to everyone's liking but I am trying to give sound,honest advice to my fellow cyclists in basically saying 'Save your money'. Unless you are racing at a high level £2.5k is the most you should really be paying for a road bike.
  • Andyb10
    Andyb10 Posts: 126
    sturmey wrote:
    Flambes wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Beatmaker wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?

    What a ridiculous thing to say :?
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?
    It's a bike, he can ride it as fast or slow as he wants, don't need to justify it to anyone. Stunning bike mate - enjoy
    gaddster wrote:
    Why should it? Are you the arbiter of who can have what bike?

    Great looking bike mate!


    take it you're all fat or slow or both then?

    Take it you're poor and bitter or both then?

    I am neither of these in fact.

    I could happily afford to buy numerous bikes as expensive as this one but I never will. This is because I am not an elite level road racer nor,I suspect, is the OP,ipso facto the purchase of this bike would be a complete waste of my money.
    And despite earlier comments comparing bling bikes to flash sports cars there is,frankly, no analogy there.
    The high performance car can be made to travel at a competitively fast speed by anybody irrespective of their physical fitness. The bike can not.

    I realise this advice may not be to everyone's liking but I am trying to give sound,honest advice to my fellow cyclists in basically saying 'Save your money'. Unless you are racing at a high level £2.5k is the most you should really be paying for a road bike.


    What a load of tosh - why bother buying a car that can go faster the the speed limit then. Why bother buying anything thats more expensive the what you actually need - don't buy a TAG watch just get a 5 quid one

    Spend you're own money on what you want not on what will suffice to do the job
  • sturmey
    sturmey Posts: 964
    Why bother buying anything thats more expensive the what you actually need - don't buy a TAG watch just get a 5 quid one

    Spend you're own money on what you want not on what will suffice to do the job

    You are merely trying to justify your own vanity in buying an expensive bike you can't ride fast enough.
  • LiamW
    LiamW Posts: 358
    You're merely acting a tool because it comes naturally to you then.
  • p9uma
    p9uma Posts: 565
    I realise this advice may not be to everyone's liking but I am trying to give sound,honest advice to my fellow cyclists in basically saying 'Save your money'. Unless you are racing at a high level £2.5k is the most you should really be paying for a road bike.

    In your original comment you were not offering advice, you asked wether the OP ability was justified in owning a bicycle of that quality.

    The tone of your the question was unpleasant and unnecessary, and in my opinion anyway, It's not any of your business whether the OP's ability justifies owning the bike. Regardless of whether you can afford a bike like that or not your comment came across as sour grapes.
    Trek Madone 3.5
    Whyte Coniston
    1970 Dawes Kingpin
  • cornerblock
    cornerblock Posts: 3,228
    quangtt that is a beautiful bike. Enjoy it, slow, medium paced, fast, uphill, downhill, anyway you bleeding like.

    sturmey if only life had one of these,
    rewind.jpg
  • winton
    winton Posts: 165
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?

    Sturmey, if you have a point to make, by all means make it. To pose a question like that merely appears supercilious.
  • EightOhEight
    EightOhEight Posts: 170
    sturmey wrote:
    Flambes wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Beatmaker wrote:
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?

    What a ridiculous thing to say :?
    sturmey wrote:
    Does your riding ability do this bike justice?
    It's a bike, he can ride it as fast or slow as he wants, don't need to justify it to anyone. Stunning bike mate - enjoy
    gaddster wrote:
    Why should it? Are you the arbiter of who can have what bike?

    Great looking bike mate!


    take it you're all fat or slow or both then?

    Take it you're poor and bitter or both then?

    I am neither of these in fact.

    I could happily afford to buy numerous bikes as expensive as this one but I never will. This is because I am not an elite level road racer nor,I suspect, is the OP,ipso facto the purchase of this bike would be a complete waste of my money.
    And despite earlier comments comparing bling bikes to flash sports cars there is,frankly, no analogy there.
    The high performance car can be made to travel at a competitively fast speed by anybody irrespective of their physical fitness. The bike can not.

    I realise this advice may not be to everyone's liking but I am trying to give sound,honest advice to my fellow cyclists in basically saying 'Save your money'. Unless you are racing at a high level £2.5k is the most you should really be paying for a road bike.
    Fair comment.
  • Beatmaker
    Beatmaker Posts: 1,092
    Sturmey, this is a bit like that other thread where you said tights were for wimps.
  • sturmey
    sturmey Posts: 964
    Beatmaker wrote:
    Sturmey, this is a bit like that other thread where you said tights were for wimps.


    :lol:
  • Zingzang
    Zingzang Posts: 196
    I am shocked at the adverse reaction to Sturmey's comments. I'm sure he meant well really. I know him as an easy going family man.

    http://digitaljournal.com/image/102322