carbon v aluminium

here is one for the debate, this caad 9 was ridden into a ditch. the carbon forks appear ok.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cannondale-CAAD9-PARTS-Shimano-105-shifters-brakes-wheels-mech-crank-Look-pedals-/140725022285?pt=UK_Bikes_GL&hash=item20c3dd6e4d
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cannondale-CAAD9-PARTS-Shimano-105-shifters-brakes-wheels-mech-crank-Look-pedals-/140725022285?pt=UK_Bikes_GL&hash=item20c3dd6e4d
0
Posts
Dear Mr Ford, I wrote off my car in an accident, but it is less than 3 years old..... :?
Winter - Trek Madone 3.5 2012 with UDi2 upgrade.
For getting dirty - Moda Canon
Not quite the same, but some manufacturers have crash replacement policy that gives you a good discount on a replacement for a crash-damaged frame. Perhaps that's what he had in mind.
Bike 1
Bike 2-A
IME carbon is much more likely to survive than equivalent weight alu frame in this sort of impact. I hit a child on a micro sccoter at over 20mph on carbon frame/forks and came to a stop almost immediately. Only damage at all visible was slight buckle to alloy wheel. I as pretty nervous about damage at first but have since done another ~1000km and over 65kmh on descents still seems rock solid.
MTB - 1997 Kona Kula
Hybrid - Kona Dew Deluxe
Road - 2011 Ribble Gran Fondo, Omega Matrix Ultegra