Scott Addict - Now Finished

rozzer32

My new 2011 Scott Addict R2. The Foil replaces the Addict and this is a brand new frame that is last years stock that I got at a bargain price

Will be transferring parts from my R3


IMG_0271[1] by rozzer32, on Flickr


IMG_0274[1] by rozzer32, on Flickr

Frame: Scott Addict R2, Size 54
Forks: Scott Addict
Bars: 3T Ergosum Team
Stem: 3T ARX
Bar Tape: Fizik Microtex

Front Brake Lever: Sram Force
Front Caliper: Sram Force
Rear Brake Lever: Sram Force
Rear Caliper: Sram Force

Shifters: Sram Force
Cables: Jagwire
Front Mech: Sram Force
Rear Mech: Sram Force

Seat: Fizik Antares
Seat Post: 3T Doric Team


Cranks: Sram Force
Chainring(s): Sram Force 53/39
Chain: Sram Force
Cassette: Sram Force 11-28
Pedals: Look Keo Blade 16 Nm
Bottom Bracket: Sram BB86

Front Wheel: Shimano RS80
Tire: Vitorria

Back Wheel: Shimano RS80
Tire: Vitorria

Accessories: Garmin Edge 500

Weight: Should be light

timmyturbo

thats going to be a great bike ! my scott addict with force and ritchey finishing kit weighs 16.25Lbs including pedals with crappy WHR500's on it !! and its a 58CM frame

mallorcajeff

As a fellow Scott Addict rider thats going to be a great bike I cannot believe how light these things are. Even with 50mm Durace Carbon clinchers its still light. Enjoy it will be ace. I wanted those pedals on mine!

timmyturbo

i like the crank bros quattro 4 Ti ones , they are light and easy to use but the cleats are heavy so not a real weight loss lol

davelakers

53/39?
After your recent performances up the hills Rozzer I would have plumped for a triple.......

rozzer32

davelakers wrote:

53/39?
After your recent performances up the hills Rozzer I would have plumped for a triple.......

Yes I think the lack of training was the main reason for my lagging. Maybe I should go for a compact. Would still be able to out sprint you with a 50 ring on the front

davelakers

rozzer32 wrote:

davelakers wrote:

53/39?
After your recent performances up the hills Rozzer I would have plumped for a triple.......

Yes I think the lack of training was the main reason for my lagging. Maybe I should go for a compact. Would still be able to out sprint you with a 50 ring on the front

You havent managed to yet..........

rozzer32

davelakers wrote:

rozzer32 wrote:

davelakers wrote:

53/39?
After your recent performances up the hills Rozzer I would have plumped for a triple.......

Yes I think the lack of training was the main reason for my lagging. Maybe I should go for a compact. Would still be able to out sprint you with a 50 ring on the front

You havent managed to yet..........

much

TMR

Aah, young love! Sweet!

rozzer32

Well the build is finally finished. Will post some pics up tomorrow. I'll warn you now there is a lot of steerer showing. But only because I'm off to see Mr Timmis at Cadence Sport next month. Will be chopped down as soon as my fit is done

rozzer32

IMG_0302[1] by rozzer32, on Flickr

Steerer will be sorted once I have had my fit with Adrian next month. Still need to fit the Look pedals but going to wait for my fit so I can get the right wedges for my cleats, as I only have speedplay ones. Also gone for a set of Q rings so will see how I get on with them.

TMR

rozzer32 wrote:

Also gone for a set of Q rings so will see how I get on with them.

Looking forward to feedback about those. Considering a set for my Cervelo.

rozzer32

The Mad Rapper wrote:

rozzer32 wrote:

Also gone for a set of Q rings so will see how I get on with them.

Looking forward to feedback about those. Considering a set for my Cervelo.

Apologies for the loooooooonnnngggg time for an update.

Well I've gone back to round rings. Did the Q rings make a difference? Erm I can't say I noticed any. But I did notice the drop in shifting performance. A couple of times it over shifted and a number of times it was a like a monkey trying to flick the chain wearing boxing gloves. So I went back to round rings. Has my performance dropped? I can't say it has, or if there is any difference then I certainly haven't noticed it. But the big improvement is the front shifting. Would I go back to Q rings? Erm probably not, although if I did I would probably only do so if using an electronic groupset as the front shifting is supposedly that much better.

Would be interesting to see how the oysmetric rings compare to Q rings.

galatzo

How did the fit go ?
Any pics following the fit ?
Interested to see how your set up compared before and after visiting Adrian.
What was the final weight ?

bradash

nice bike, ive had one for a year now and riding it is bliss.
watch the pedals as my blade carbon ti's scraped a curb and nearly totally removed the spring seat on the underside.
its just a matter of time before they go now :evil:
speedplay next i think

rozzer32

bradash wrote:

nice bike, ive had one for a year now and riding it is bliss.
watch the pedals as my blade carbon ti's scraped a curb and nearly totally removed the spring seat on the underside.
its just a matter of time before they go now :evil:
speedplay next i think

I used the looks for like 5 rides then went back to speedplay. Will never use anything other than speedplay now.

ianho

I have the Keo Blade Ti sitting in the storeroom too. I only use Speedplay Zero Ti on all my bikes now. Nothing else comes close to the Speedplays.

Ron Stuart

Here's mine...
8)