Who would have been at fault?
DrKJM
Posts: 271
Hi.
I've recently started cycling in after changing jobs and on the ride home today I was riding on the nearside of a stationary queue of traffic when a passenger (in a cab, close to the train station) leapt out of the passenger side. I saw him and stopped without hitting him or the door but it was close. Had I made contact would it have been my fault or would the passenger of the cab borne some liability for not having checked? Just curious, as I think I've learned my lesson re care in those circumstances.
Thanks
Kevin
I've recently started cycling in after changing jobs and on the ride home today I was riding on the nearside of a stationary queue of traffic when a passenger (in a cab, close to the train station) leapt out of the passenger side. I saw him and stopped without hitting him or the door but it was close. Had I made contact would it have been my fault or would the passenger of the cab borne some liability for not having checked? Just curious, as I think I've learned my lesson re care in those circumstances.
Thanks
Kevin
0
Comments
-
I would say it's their fault for not looking. I don't know if this is correct.
I tend to filter on the offside as I feel safer. Cars can't squish me into the kerb, I can see what's coming and if necessary move in between cars to let a wide vehicle through, if the traffic starts to move off there is plenty of time to pick your moment and merge in between cars as they move off. I think drivers are more likely to expect something to pass on their right.0 -
Highway code:Parking
239
....
you MUST ensure you do not hit anyone when you open your door – check for cyclists or other traffic
Though it doesn't say which door. So it probably means all doors. "Must" means its a legal requirement (I think)0 -
Reading something else and saw this:
http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/secure/ever-been-doored-it-is-actually-illegal/0 -
Thanks. Useful to know.0