Who would have been at fault?

Hi.
I've recently started cycling in after changing jobs and on the ride home today I was riding on the nearside of a stationary queue of traffic when a passenger (in a cab, close to the train station) leapt out of the passenger side. I saw him and stopped without hitting him or the door but it was close. Had I made contact would it have been my fault or would the passenger of the cab borne some liability for not having checked? Just curious, as I think I've learned my lesson re care in those circumstances.
Thanks
Kevin
I've recently started cycling in after changing jobs and on the ride home today I was riding on the nearside of a stationary queue of traffic when a passenger (in a cab, close to the train station) leapt out of the passenger side. I saw him and stopped without hitting him or the door but it was close. Had I made contact would it have been my fault or would the passenger of the cab borne some liability for not having checked? Just curious, as I think I've learned my lesson re care in those circumstances.
Thanks
Kevin
0
Posts
I tend to filter on the offside as I feel safer. Cars can't squish me into the kerb, I can see what's coming and if necessary move in between cars to let a wide vehicle through, if the traffic starts to move off there is plenty of time to pick your moment and merge in between cars as they move off. I think drivers are more likely to expect something to pass on their right.
Marin Nail Trail
Cotic Solaris
Though it doesn't say which door. So it probably means all doors. "Must" means its a legal requirement (I think)
http://www.londoncyclist.co.uk/secure/ever-been-doored-it-is-actually-illegal/
Marin Nail Trail
Cotic Solaris