Belt Drives - are they worth it?
Tegglington
Posts: 65
Good afternoon Ladies and Gent,
I have recently fallen in love with the Trek Soho Deluxe (http://www.bikeradar.com/commuting/gear ... e-12-45827)
but more importantly the belt drive chain. is it possible to buy these as seperate parts? and if so how much? have looked at the web and can't seem to find anywhere onlone to buy them.
also is it worth it? I know it may look rather cool, but does it work they way it should?
Just after a bit of advice from people with experience in these things.
Thanks
Warren
I have recently fallen in love with the Trek Soho Deluxe (http://www.bikeradar.com/commuting/gear ... e-12-45827)
but more importantly the belt drive chain. is it possible to buy these as seperate parts? and if so how much? have looked at the web and can't seem to find anywhere onlone to buy them.
also is it worth it? I know it may look rather cool, but does it work they way it should?
Just after a bit of advice from people with experience in these things.
Thanks
Warren
0
Comments
-
Tegglington wrote:but more importantly the belt drive chain.
Belt drive is quieter, lower maintenance and the belt should last longer. You can buy the bits but as you need a dedicated frame with a removeable seat stay section, there isn't much demand.
SimonCurrently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
Owned a district for 3 years now. Still on the original belt and must be getting on to 5000 miles now.
No need to worry about cleaning it oiling or even better getting trousers dirty if you just pop down to the shops.
Would i get another belt drive?
Too right. Gears - well not needed really. Shame this bike is discontinued in the UK.0 -
Who stocks spares for Gates belt drive?0
-
It is a Trek so no.+++++++++++++++++++++
we are the proud, the few, Descendents.
Panama - finally putting a nail in the economic theory of the trickle down effect.0 -
Conventional wisdom (previous cycle forum threads) would suggest no.
Because chain maintenance for a hub gear isn't that much effort and the chains are cheap to replace should you decide not to bother at all. Whereas bikes with belt drive fitted tend to be expensive (with the odd hand converted exception - the guy who took a hacksaw to his on-one) and there is a theoretical reduction in efficiency. i.e. cost wise it doesn't stack up.
At this point you should normally encounter a discussion on whether the belts are up to the task in which the following points are made - they are used on motorcycles, a cyclist will generate more torque than a motorcycle during a pedal stroke and a bit about the nice Brit (Mr Beaumont possibly) who cycled round the world with one.
The normal collective advice is to forget the belt and consider a full chainguard instead.
I'd still like one though...but on an on-one pompetamine.0 -
tiny_pens wrote:a cyclist will generate more torque than a motorcycle during a pedal stroke
SimonCurrently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
belt drive - brilliant idea in theory - just doesn't work economically at the moment.
Shimano alfine 11 speed hub, chain driven is probably your optimum performance for lowest maintenance hassle alternative.Bianchi Infinito CV
Bianchi Via Nirone 7 Ultegra
Brompton S Type
Carrera Vengeance Ultimate Ltd
Gary Fisher Aquila '98
Front half of a Viking Saratoga Tandem0