Defy 2 or Trek 1.5 (2012)

Hi there.
After months of negotiation, I have finally persuaded my work to sign up to a cycle to work scheme. During this time I have researched which bike would be best as a starter into the world of road bikes, and have come to the conlusion that the new 2012 Giant Defy 2 would be my best bet (Tiagra gears, pannier mounts etc).
However, having received the all important voucher to claim my new bike, I've discovered that the major Giant UK distributor can't get stock of Defy 2 bikes until March of next year. How crazy is that?
Anyway, not really wanting to wait 4 months to get my new bike, the store suggested that I look at the Trek 1.5 which seems to have pretty much identical features and can be in stock within 7 days.
I've not heard a lot about TREK, so was wondering whether anyone had an opinion on this?
Am I going to be disappointed if I opt for the Trek, rather than holding out for the Defy 2? Are there any major differences that I've missed? Or is the Trek just as good and a comparable option?
Link to Spec for Defy 2: http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/bikes/model/defy.2/9317/49822/
Link to Spec for Trek 1.5: http://www.trekbikes.com/uk/en/bikes/road/sport/2_and_1_series/1_5#/uk/en/model/details?url=uk/en/bikes/road/sport/2_and_1_series/1_5
Thanks in advance.
After months of negotiation, I have finally persuaded my work to sign up to a cycle to work scheme. During this time I have researched which bike would be best as a starter into the world of road bikes, and have come to the conlusion that the new 2012 Giant Defy 2 would be my best bet (Tiagra gears, pannier mounts etc).
However, having received the all important voucher to claim my new bike, I've discovered that the major Giant UK distributor can't get stock of Defy 2 bikes until March of next year. How crazy is that?
Anyway, not really wanting to wait 4 months to get my new bike, the store suggested that I look at the Trek 1.5 which seems to have pretty much identical features and can be in stock within 7 days.
I've not heard a lot about TREK, so was wondering whether anyone had an opinion on this?
Am I going to be disappointed if I opt for the Trek, rather than holding out for the Defy 2? Are there any major differences that I've missed? Or is the Trek just as good and a comparable option?
Link to Spec for Defy 2: http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/bikes/model/defy.2/9317/49822/
Link to Spec for Trek 1.5: http://www.trekbikes.com/uk/en/bikes/road/sport/2_and_1_series/1_5#/uk/en/model/details?url=uk/en/bikes/road/sport/2_and_1_series/1_5
Thanks in advance.
0
Posts
Anyone own or had experience of a 2012 trek?
At the price point i would worry about how a bike feels to ride more than anything else
So I went to my LBS who stock the TREK 1.5 and told them the above story. The result being that they measured me up on both bikes (they had a 2011 defy in stock) and told me that in the giant range I'd actually suit a Medium rather than an M/L as I had previously been told.
So I tried out both bikes and, TBH, couldn't really tell much difference - they both seem good bikes (except for the sora gears on the 2011 defy)
The store my voucher is made out to do have the 2012 defy 2 in a medium, so I could go back there and get that one, but I've kinda lost confidence in them as it seems they don't really understand bike sizing.
So the new question... do I go get the defy 2 in medium from the original store (even though they havent inspired confidence in me) or stick to my LBS (I can change the name on the voucher after all) and get the TREK?
How has this become so complicated (story of my life).
Everyone likes a fit of a bike different. Everyone fits a bike differently too.