speacilzied bighit or scott voltages fr 20
72arrno
Posts: 6
i think im goin to buy specialized bighit 1 2011 or scott voltage fr20 2011 i just want to know if any one has any idea which of them would b better 4 me. Just got into downhill/free riding fairly recently and am lookin to get a half decent entry level bike.
0
Comments
-
To be honest I would have the Scott, slightly better spec and better looking too....though I would recomend sitting on them both if you can to see how they feel.0
-
Take a look at the Rose Beefcake DH2. Far better spec than either of these & only £1500 at the moment.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350
-
Or better than the Rose
http://www.canyon.com/flash/bike/images ... lpaper.jpg
Just over £1,700
http://www.canyon.com/_uk/mountainbikes ... tml?b=2577
Way better than the Rose0 -
I would say equal to the Rose when you conside that the Rose is £200 cheaper & has better transmission components & brakes.
Both have got really gay names though.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350 -
Better transmision ??? the Canyon has XT mech, SLX shifters, Hussefelt cranks, and Elixir 7's as opposed to X9 mech and shifters, and Hussefelt cranks with Elixir 5's....so better ???? comparable more like.....plus the Rose has the Domain DC's which you slagged off on the Spesh....and being honest it's not got much in the looks department compared to the Canyon.0
-
The specialized has the Domain R dual crown. The Rose has the Domain RC dual crown which has a better damper. All SRAM gearing is inferior to all Shimano!Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350
-
RockmonkeySC wrote:The specialized has the Domain R dual crown. The Rose has the Domain RC dual crown which has a better damper. All SRAM gearing is inferior to all Shimano!
Yes so why did you say the Rose better transmission when it is Sram equiped....I think you need a lie down...
0
