Cant find top tube dimensions for this bike at all
Ezy Rider
Posts: 415
I was in decathlon today and i rode a 53cm btwin facet 5 bike and it was lovely . Because of sloping top tube ,neither myself nor assistant could agree on a top tube length, we went online and couldnt find it there either :shock:
I thought it would easy to find , but still havent done so. Any of you guys got any suggestions where i should look online for it ? Ive searched btwin site, reviews,bikeradar etc etc and the one dimension missing is top tube length.
I thought it would easy to find , but still havent done so. Any of you guys got any suggestions where i should look online for it ? Ive searched btwin site, reviews,bikeradar etc etc and the one dimension missing is top tube length.
0
Comments
-
Personally, I use a tape measure.0
-
Spirit Level + Tape Measure0
-
PS. If you don't have a spirit level you might as well get one. Always handy for shelving, mirrors and the like. Make sure you understand the difference between 'virtual' and 'actual' top tube length before you do the measurement.0
-
#lol i hate decorating, but i just want to find official top tube length for that bike , cannot believe nowhere publishes it0
-
Geez fella, you're making this so painful, if "it was lovely" what's the problem it could be called a 62 but if it fits what difference does it make!0
-
smurfylicious wrote:PS. If you don't have a spirit level you might as well get one. Always handy for shelving, mirrors and the like. Make sure you understand the difference between 'virtual' and 'actual' top tube length before you do the measurement.
http://www.btwincycle.com/EN/btwin-facet-5-153257026/
Top tube looks horizontal or very close to horizontal to me so probably no need for a spirit level.
I wouldn't get too hung up over +/- 5mm. What's more important is to try a few different sizes until you're confident that you have the right size. For that kind of money don't be too embarassed to go back several times over a period of a few weeks until you're 101% certain you're making the right choice.0 -
Flasher wrote:Geez fella, you're making this so painful, if "it was lovely" what's the problem it could be called a 62 but if it fits what difference does it make!
this
every
time
if it fits, it's right, don't put a tape measure between yourself and lifemy bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny0 -
Ezy Rider wrote:MichaelW wrote:Personally, I use a tape measure.
thats what we did, i thought it was 535mm and assistant thought it was 540mm
why is nothing ever simple
Plus what about the fact that you hate 25mm or more saddle to stem drop and that bike doesn't look as if it'll do that easily without an enormous stack of spacers?0 -
A nice little piece on top-tube length for your consumption:
http://www.rivbike.com/assets/payloads/270/original_Excerpt_Top_Tube_Ruse_Layout_1.pdf0