Lightweight photo editing / graphics package
15peter20
Posts: 293
Can anyone recommend a good, lightweight digital image/photo/graphic design editor (ideally free). I don't need the full grunt of Photoshop really.
- is there a Photoshop 'lite' ?
- Picasa any good?
Ta
- is there a Photoshop 'lite' ?
- Picasa any good?
Ta
0
Comments
-
I thoroughly agree GIMP is excellent, as the man said, free as well.
Why not go the whole hog and install linux....that is free and a bloody good OS to boot.0 -
another +1 on GimpRule #5 // Harden The Feck Up.
Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.
Rule #12 // The correct number of bikes to own is n+1.
Rule #42 // A bike race shall never be preceded with a swim and/or followed by a run.0 -
I didn't find using gimp very easy so I swapped over to www.paint.net . For free, with all the plug ins, it's a real bargain.0
-
There is a photoshop "lite" if you look around.
It may or may not be legal.0 -
It depends what you mean by Photoshop lite. Since the early 2000's Photoshop has been a suite of creative software apps bundled under the 'Creative Suite" name - currently CS5 but CS6 is in the wings.
On the 'lite' side, Elements is at the entry level end of the Photoshop spectrum whilst the excellent Lightroom takes the middle ground.
Bob0 -
When he says "lite" he mights lightweight, as in, low file size, something you could whack on a usb stick and just run.0
-
Agree with the above.
At work I use paint.net - have also tried The Gimp but think that has a higher learning curve (but there is more to it)There is no secret ingredient...0 -
Sumopaint - it basically is a Photoshop Lite that runs in your web browser0
-
MS paint, it's the only way0
-
GIMP is great but terribly slow, particularly to fire up Paint is second slightly in functionality but still very good and quicker. both fit the bill as Photoshop lite.
another to consider is IrfanView, its a great little program, freeware, super fast, not a memory hog, it has the essential tools and a few that work better that the others and is very much more open source, there are hundreds of plugins for pretty much anything you may want. video player etc The developer is also very responsive to suggestions and bug reports
my only gripe with it is that it tends to be a bit of a bully in terms of 'I want to be your default...... and I won't take no for an answer'0 -
thanks all, top tips. Am trialling GIMP0
-
So, what do you think?http://www.snookcycling.wordpress.com - Reports on Cingles du Mont Ventoux, Alpe D'Huez, Galibier, Izoard, Tourmalet, Paris-Roubaix Sportive & Tour of Flanders Sportive, Amstel Gold Xperience, Vosges, C2C, WOTR routes....0
-
-
Lightroom 3 is excellent - it is essentially Photoshop pared down for professional photographers.0
-
I tried GIMP, didn't find it very easy to use, but then I have full blown Photoshop so no real need to learn it.
If your prepared to spend a little cash I think Photoshop Elements would be perfect. They're up to version 10 now which is about £70, but you can pick up version 9 for a little over £50 -
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Adobe-Photoshop-Elements-PC-Mac/dp/B0042D81NO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1317151156&sr=8-3
The advantage of Elements is if you ever want to upgrade to full blown Photoshop for whatever reason you already have a grounding of whats what.0 -
If you are looking at Elements at £70 take a look at Lightroom 3. If you've a teacher, student or school kid in the house it's about the same price and has great functionallity, an excellent library structure and can handle RAW files.0
-
+1 for Paint.net
GIMP is good but needs a lot of getting used to; but paint.net is instantly accessible.+++++++++++++++++++++
we are the proud, the few, Descendents.
Panama - finally putting a nail in the economic theory of the trickle down effect.0