25mm tyres and climbing

holker
holker Posts: 88
edited August 2011 in Road beginners
Much debate on this forum about rolling advantages of 25mm tyres compared to 23mm. What happens on long steeper climbs when road speed much reduced? Wider tyres mean more tread on the road does this make climbing with wider tyres more difficult?

Comments

  • P_Tucker
    P_Tucker Posts: 1,878
    Well, they've heavier, but unless you're racing up alpine cols what real difference would it make?
  • luv2ride
    luv2ride Posts: 2,367
    Get Continental Grand Prix 24mm Black Chilli tyres - excellent compromise!
    Titus Silk Road Ti rigid 29er - Scott Solace 10 disc - Kinesis Crosslight Pro6 disc - Scott CR1 SL - Pinnacle Arkose X 650b - Pinnacle Arkose singlespeed - Specialized Singlecross...& an Ernie Ball Musicman Stingray 4 string...
  • balthazar
    balthazar Posts: 1,565
    holker wrote:
    Much debate on this forum about rolling advantages of 25mm tyres compared to 23mm. What happens on long steeper climbs when road speed much reduced? Wider tyres mean more tread on the road does this make climbing with wider tyres more difficult?

    Lower RR is lower RR. Incline (and speed) doesn't matter. There are other considerations in tyre width (as discussed here often), but RR is hill-agnostic.
  • jibberjim
    jibberjim Posts: 2,810
    balthazar wrote:
    Lower RR is lower RR. Incline (and speed) doesn't matter. There are other considerations in tyre width (as discussed here often), but RR is hill-agnostic.

    And the lower speeds mean the likely aerodynamic penalty of the wider wheels is less of an issue, so it would be the other way from what the OP thinks.
    Jibbering Sports Stuff: http://jibbering.com/sports/
  • nferrar
    nferrar Posts: 2,511
    Weight would win out on hills so the smaller the tyre the better (even though I'm a believer in the reduced RR of 25's...)
  • Stanley222 wrote:
    nferrar wrote:
    Weight would win out on hills so the smaller the tyre the better (even though I'm a believer in the reduced RR of 25's...)

    The weight difference is so small you would never notice the difference! :roll:
    Unless you have 0% body fat then the biggest weight saving and difference to your ride would be losing weight from yourself!

    + 1
  • vorsprung
    vorsprung Posts: 1,953
    Some people think that the rotational weight of the wheel, including the tyre is important on climbs.

    The rotational weight believers say that the weight of the wheel at the rim is crucial
    This is because at a high rate of effort, often the pedal stroke is not as smooth as normal.
    This means that within one wheel revolution the speed of the rim may accelerate or slow down. These small decelerations, go the theory, have to be fixed to keep the wheel moving at a constant rate. Extra power is needed to accelerate a larger mass. So lighter wheels work better with a ragged pedal stroke

    The non believers say that the weight of the wheels only counts as part of the overall weight of the bike and rider. The wheel weight, they say is no more or less significant than the weight of (for instance) the seatpost on a climb.
    This group claim that the accelerations and decelerations within a single rotation are not significant

    I'm not sure about which actual theory is right. However, it seems to me that climbing with lighter wheels is easier, significantly more easy than the reduction to the overall weight would explain
  • Monty Dog
    Monty Dog Posts: 20,614
    The difference is weight between a 23 and 25mm tyre of the same construction is going to be in the region of tens of grams and the impact on the aerodynamics of the wheel at those speeds almost neglible - by comparison, the weight loss from having a wee at the bottom of the climb would have more impact. On the converse, having a wider 25mm tyre for typically twisty, bumpy descent would mean you'd corner with more confidence and less likely to impact puncture, thus negating any perceived benefits accrued on the climb. Gimme the 25mm tyre anyday.
    Make mine an Italian, with Campagnolo on the side..
  • dilemna
    dilemna Posts: 2,187
    Stanley222 wrote:
    nferrar wrote:
    Weight would win out on hills so the smaller the tyre the better (even though I'm a believer in the reduced RR of 25's...)

    The weight difference is so small you would never notice the difference! :roll:
    Unless you have 0% body fat then the biggest weight saving and difference to your ride would be losing weight from yourself!

    + 1

    Yeah, cut out the pies is by far the best advice.
    Life is like a roll of toilet paper; long and useful, but always ends at the wrong moment. Anon.
    Think how stupid the average person is.......
    half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
  • nferrar
    nferrar Posts: 2,511
    Yeah but it's a theoretical discussion, I don't think anyone's actually suggesting it's worth changing from 25's to 23's just for a climb...
  • andrewjoseph
    andrewjoseph Posts: 2,165
    nferrar wrote:
    Yeah but it's a theoretical discussion, I don't think anyone's actually suggesting it's worth changing from 25's to 23's just for a climb...

    isn't that what contador did in the last two tours?

    :wink::wink:
    --
    Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
  • thiscocks
    thiscocks Posts: 549
    Luv2ride wrote:
    Get Continental Grand Prix 24mm Black Chilli tyres - excellent compromise!

    +1. Great all round tyre- comfortable and tough