Progress
Secteur
Posts: 1,971
When I got my first bike and started cycling only 5 months ago, I went for a triple as I was overweight and it really is very hilly where I live.
I would rely heavily on the granny-ring (small ring of the triple) and use it on every hill.
Anyway, in the last week I have noticed that I very rarely every use the granny-ring now, in fact in almost every circumstance and even on the steepest hills I never go below the easiest gear on the middle chain-ring (which, I think, equates to a middle gear on the small-chainring of a double/compact).
So, I must be making progress!
I would rely heavily on the granny-ring (small ring of the triple) and use it on every hill.
Anyway, in the last week I have noticed that I very rarely every use the granny-ring now, in fact in almost every circumstance and even on the steepest hills I never go below the easiest gear on the middle chain-ring (which, I think, equates to a middle gear on the small-chainring of a double/compact).
So, I must be making progress!
0
Comments
-
Well done.The only disability in life is a poor attitude.0
-
Well played Secteur, just out of interest now you don't use the little ring any more have your noises stopped. Only joking, I find myself in a similar predicament, I too opted for a triple as I moved over from mountain biking and wanted the really low gearing I was used too. However, like yourself I very rarely use the little ring now. In fact I probably will look at replacing my triple Sora set up with a double soon.
Glad your enjoying your riding.Giant Defy Advanced
Cannondale Super Six 105
Spesh Rockhopper0 -
I had the same bike and would almost never use the smallest chain ring, so I have changed mine to a compact now0
-
i have a compact and have NEVER used the smaller ring...........
but i do live on the norfolk/suffolk borderTo be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid......
95kg to 87kg and dropping......
Gary Fisher - Tassajara
Trek - 2.30 -
Sounds like it might be worth changing the cassette for something with a closer ratio at some point in the future. Or if you want to make more use of your gears as they are then try doing some loops around Ramsbottom Rake.0
-
thegibdog wrote:Sounds like it might be worth changing the cassette for something with a closer ratio at some point in the future. Or if you want to make more use of your gears as they are then try doing some loops around Ramsbottom Rake.
I live about 5 min ride from the Rake, but have never tried it (I often cycle up Lumb Carr Rd which I dont find especially difficult) but have heard it's hard!! I've driven up it and it's steep++ !
Just wished I could get another 10kg off and I reckon I'd be a seriously good climber... but I just cant get the weight off and my will power is crap!0 -
Good stuff Secter!
I have been trying a similar idea with my Synapse, avoiding the 'granny' ring, and after a few months it is starting to pay off, a few climbs where i'd needed it before I can get up them in the middle ring now. Be a while before i think about ever changing it to a compact though!
I'm finding i need to concentrate now on getting that big ring moving, which is pretty tough! Would there be more teeth in the big ring of a compact compared to a triple?0 -
I dont get why people are so hung up about having a triple. I have the triple and tbh it hasnt really been used much. This doesnt mean that i look at it every day and wonder how i can change it for a double which to all intents and purposes has very similar gears.
Is it people thinking that a triple is for beginners and now that they have progessed they want a double to be like the 'proper' riders?
I plan to find some hills that challenge me enough to remind me i need the triple. Lakeland passes will probably fit the bill.0 -
To be fair, when I was sold the bike I knew nothing of cycling and gears - they guy in the shop just told me to buy a triple.
I prefer the look of the compact/doubles, and of course it's what the pro's use so they seem more "right", plus they can have the same range of gears as my triple, just in bigger steps. Probably a daft reason to want one, but my next bike wont be a triple.0 -
My audax bike has a triple. Triple's are harder to maintain and keep changing sweetly in my experience - mainly because of the length of the chain and the arm on the rear mech and the greater difficulty in trimming three rings. I use the granny ring no more than three or four times a year. and yet, when you need it, you really need it - you don't have much latitude when you're faced with a steep hill with 250 miles in your legs. But my other road bikes have 52/39 rings and 11-21 or 12-26 cassettes and I haven't come across much tarmac that you can't get up in 39-26 provided you're reasonably fresh.0