Are NYC Police serious?
gtvlusso
Posts: 5,112
WTF?
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/201 ... _ride.html
I am staggered.....Are NYC Police basing all of thier policies on the cop from the Village people?
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/201 ... _ride.html
I am staggered.....Are NYC Police basing all of thier policies on the cop from the Village people?
0
Comments
-
<cynic mode>
Good publicity for her bike firm isn't it?
</cynic mode>--
Chris
Genesis Equilibrium - FCN 3/4/50 -
Outfits like that should be encouraged - nice change from lycra0
-
On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......0 -
gtvlusso wrote:On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......0 -
Daily News wrote:Rijcken, 31, was not given a ticket during the May 3 incident,
Well I've seen the picture and can say that I would have given her one
The quote is irelevantNobody told me we had a communication problem0 -
gtvlusso wrote:On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......
Pictures or helmet cam video or it didn't happen....--
Chris
Genesis Equilibrium - FCN 3/4/50 -
Thats one of the most dutch names I've ever heard.0
-
gtvlusso wrote:On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......
I've have a similar experience, I didn't dash for it, I slowed down to double check I wasn't suffering from heatstroke and imagining things. Whilst I guess it could be classed as dangerous vbyb virtue of being distracting to other cyclists, I think its commendable behaviour and to be encouraged.Bianchi Infinito CV
Bianchi Via Nirone 7 Ultegra
Brompton S Type
Carrera Vengeance Ultimate Ltd
Gary Fisher Aquila '98
Front half of a Viking Saratoga Tandem0 -
t4tomo wrote:gtvlusso wrote:On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......
I've have a similar experience, I didn't dash for it, I slowed down to double check I wasn't suffering from heatstroke and imagining things. Whilst I guess it could be classed as dangerous vbyb virtue of being distracting to other cyclists, I think its commendable behaviour and to be encouraged.
It was mesmorising at the time, but I felt that I should be gentlemanly and maintain my SCR foothold - utilising all the power of the seat of my pants, I made a run for it and did not make eye contact as I passed. After all, I had seen more of the girl than most and needed to keep that gem with me as I cycled bravely onwards, then tell all of you on here.
It was not very ladylike, I would rather have seen some boobage than a sweaty crotch.0 -
gtvlusso wrote:WTF?
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/201 ... _ride.html
I am staggered.....Are NYC Police basing all of thier policies on the cop from the Village people?
Maybe they just wanted an excuse to take down her particularsNone of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
She is a publicist I think ? So its a made up story.0
-
First we export our bikes. Now we export our women. What next?0
-
Girls always look more attractive on bikes than they would without the bike. FACT.
It's exactly the same effect as having them stand next to fast 'good looking' cars.
No one knows why.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:Girls always look more attractive on bikes than they would without the bike. FACT.
It's exactly the same effect as having them stand next to fast 'good looking' cars.
No one knows why.
Apparently straight men think pretty women should be allowed to steal bikes, and will even HELP THEM!Nobody told me we had a communication problem0 -
Libraio wrote:First we export our bikes. Now we export our women. What next?
I have to say that, as a general rule, I greatly prefer your women. Both are well made, beautifully finished, comfortable, and will provide many years of satisfactory service, but the bikes are a bit heavy and cumbersome for my tatse.....
You send us some pretty good cheese, too.0 -
I'd have booked her for having no brakes. That's proper dangerous that is. Also for crimes against common sense, i.e. owning a fixie in public....0
-
walkingbootweather wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:Girls always look more attractive on bikes than they would without the bike. FACT.
It's exactly the same effect as having them stand next to fast 'good looking' cars.
No one knows why.
Apparently straight men think pretty women should be allowed to steal bikes, and will even HELP THEM!
Thats hilarious...0 -
The Van Moof probably has a kick-back drum brake.0
-
gtvlusso wrote:On a sidenote to this;
I saw a petite lady on her bike cycling to work last week. She had 3/4 lycra leggings on.
As I cam up from behind, my prefered method of engagement, she was seated and pedalling away. However, as we came to a small incline she got out of the saddle and started to really push on. I can tell you with all honesty that there was no anti bacterial insert in her lycra leggings, they were gym leggings........just purest cameltoe, visible from behind. Yes, a full reverse cameltoe.....
I made a dash for it.......
The 'dash' he made is still in his bibs.The only disability in life is a poor attitude.0