For the Person who has everything.

nicklouse

something that does nothing.

http://thisiscolossal.com/2011/03/the-m ... s-machine/

welshkev

old

Gazlar

I thought the answer would be penicillin

mudsucker

i though it would be an ipad

sheepsteeth

i absolutely love that!!

i wonder how much they cost!!

Fully-sprung

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

VWsurfbum

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

Nob

welshkev

VWsurfbum wrote:

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

Nob

this^^^^^

getonyourbike

welshkev wrote:

VWsurfbum wrote:

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

Nob

this^^^^^

+potato but I thought it was spelt knob :?

The Northern Monkey

build your own!!
http://www.instructables.com/id/The-Mos ... s-Machine/

sheepsteeth

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

you

are

an

idiot

Fully-sprung

sheepsteeth wrote:

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

you

are

an

idiot

No, the OP is the idiot, as he stated that the person has everything and then wanted to give him something he obviously already owned.

bartimaeus

"A literal minded person just doesn't get figurative speech, instead interpreting instructions, idioms, understatement, sarcasm, and so forth completely literally... Characters who have this as a primary characteristic will occasionally be The Comically Serious."

Raymondavalon

Fully-sprung wrote:

sheepsteeth wrote:

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

you

are

an

idiot

No, the OP is the idiot, as he stated that the person has everything and then wanted to give him something he obviously already owned.

Fully-Sprung, once again you show you lack the mental ability to understand the purpose of the Crudcatcher.
Now drink your milk and get your pajamas on, mummy will tuck your lame 11 year old ass into bed and read you another exciting installment from "The Care Bears"

welshkev

Fully-sprung wrote:

sheepsteeth wrote:

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

you

are

an

idiot

No, the OP is the idiot, as he stated that the person has everything and then wanted to give him something he obviously already owned.

yes if you take it literally.....but if he's like my brother who's loaded and buys whatever he wants, i always ask "what should i get him, he's got everything?" at birthdays and christmas....obviously he doesn't have EVERYTHING!!!!

if you had siblings, peers, friends etc you may get that it's not literal :?

*AL*

Fully-sprung wrote:

But according to your title the person already has all of them, and the entirety of Earth. And the universe and it's surroundings for that matter. So giving him something he already owns wouldn't really satisfy him.

You sir, are a sheepstwat*









*full and unreserved acknowledgement to copyright owner (sheepsteeth)

DF33

Gazlar wrote:

I thought the answer would be penicillin

Like the thinking Gazlar

Northwind

Fully Sprung has never come to my attention before but man. What a fud.

Raymondavalon

Northwind wrote:

Fully Sprung has never come to my attention before but man. What a fud.

That's a compliment. He's a real cheesewand kiddie. He never Posts after 9PM as that's his bedtime

Gazlar

Oh, I've missed another Fully-mong special!

So fully-Sprung If I were to say that literally, everyone on the crudcatcher thought you were an annoying little scrotum sack, aged somewhere between the ages of being too old to play with your Sylvanian Families but too young to discover the sweet satisfaction of vigorous masturbation, even though you are currently a prime candidate to spend a long lifetime cracking one off into a congealed Jj cloth whilst watching repeats of hollyoaks, rocking and sobbing.

Literally that paragraph would be wrong. Mainly because you obviously like being like that and I must reluctantly admit that you are currently free to post on this forum, and also that other crudders may envision your future involving different self abuse paraphenalia, such as a Ronan Keating vid and a sheet of plenty (other kitchen towels are available).

So whilst literally that whole statement would be incorrect, what I have done is used a commonly used "figure of speech" (that figure of speech being the whole second paragraph) to sum up an opinion in a "best fit" way that society understands.

Interestingly I notice there was no argument over the form and function of the phrase "were having a go on your mum" used in other threads

anyway, I don't think anything that's been written so far on this thread is malicious, just pointed advice that if you stop being an argumentative little gobshite, people will cut you some slack

Fully-sprung

And how much time did you waste typing that? I get the fact that it was a figure of speech, but you lot don't get the fact that I was being sarcastic

Northwind

Fully-sprung wrote:

you lot don't get the fact that I was being sarcastic

I should do less of that were I you, you're incredibly bad at it.

tom_howard

Fully-sprung wrote:

you lot don't get the fact that I was being sarcastic

If that's the case why did you defend yourself with

Fully-sprung wrote:

No, the OP is the idiot, as he stated that the person has everything and then wanted to give him something he obviously already owned.

:roll: Bet you're glad you tried to be a smart arse now aren't you boy?

wobbem

Gazlar wrote:

Oh, I've missed another Fully-mong special!

So fully-Sprung If I were to say that literally, everyone on the crudcatcher thought you were an annoying little scrotum sack, aged somewhere between the ages of being too old to play with your Sylvanian Families but too young to discover the sweet satisfaction of vigorous masturbation, even though you are currently a prime candidate to spend a long lifetime cracking one off into a congealed Jj cloth whilst watching repeats of hollyoaks, rocking and sobbing.

Literally that paragraph would be wrong. Mainly because you obviously like being like that and I must reluctantly admit that you are currently free to post on this forum, and also that other crudders may envision your future involving different self abuse paraphenalia, such as a Ronan Keating vid and a sheet of plenty (other kitchen towels are available).

So whilst literally that whole statement would be incorrect, what I have done is used a commonly used "figure of speech" (that figure of speech being the whole second paragraph) to sum up an opinion in a "best fit" way that society understands.

Interestingly I notice there was no argument over the form and function of the phrase "were having a go on your mum" used in other threads

anyway, I don't think anything that's been written so far on this thread is malicious, just pointed advice that if you stop being an argumentative little gobshite, people will cut you some slack

You sir are a poet

Gazlar

No time wasted at all, I can multitask

getonyourbike

Gazlar wrote:

No time wasted at all, I can multitask

a bit like sheepsteeth's mum, that

Gazlar

Hmm, I've claimed to be some things in the past, the next Jesus, pipesmoker of the year and even Grooverider from Fabio and grooverider, but never Sheepsteeths mum, even I couldn't be held in such esteem, great as I am.

getonyourbike

Gazlar wrote:

Hmm, I've claimed to be some things in the past, the next Jesus, pipesmoker of the year and even Grooverider from Fabio and grooverider, but never Sheepsteeths mum, even I couldn't be held in such esteem, great as I am.

VWsurfbum

Gazlar wrote:

Hmm, I've claimed to be some things in the past, the next Jesus, pipesmoker of the year and even Grooverider from Fabio and grooverider, but never Sheepsteeths mum, even I couldn't be held in such esteem, great as I am.

thats odd because I AM A GROOVERIDER although i dont get much chance anymore

crazy88

Is a grooverider not a term for that there homosexualism? It was when I was a lad!

VWsurfbum

crazy88 wrote:

Is a grooverider not a term for that there homosexualism? It was when I was a lad!

:? i didnt think so? I'm using it a way of the female beetle bonet?