Gear ratios
spicyrider
Posts: 23
Right got a querie on gear ratios...
34t front 34t rear 1:1 ratio right?
36t front 36t rear 1:1 ratio exatly the same ?or more or less effort required?
confused? i am!
34t front 34t rear 1:1 ratio right?
36t front 36t rear 1:1 ratio exatly the same ?or more or less effort required?
confused? i am!
2010 lapierre spicy 316
2000 cannondale super v 3000 fr sold
1996 speialized rockhopper sold
19?? raliegh discovery
19?? falcon cheetah15 (stolen)
1984ish raliegh burner
19?? raliegh boxer
2000 cannondale super v 3000 fr sold
1996 speialized rockhopper sold
19?? raliegh discovery
19?? falcon cheetah15 (stolen)
1984ish raliegh burner
19?? raliegh boxer
0
Comments
-
The same ;-)0
-
if the ratio is the same, the effort is the same.0
-
In a perfect system larger cogs are also more efficient so under lab conditions 36:36 is very marginally more efficient than 34:34. Sod all real world difference though!0
-
thats what i thought, thanks guys, settles that discussion i had today!2010 lapierre spicy 316
2000 cannondale super v 3000 fr sold
1996 speialized rockhopper sold
19?? raliegh discovery
19?? falcon cheetah15 (stolen)
1984ish raliegh burner
19?? raliegh boxer0 -
spicyrider wrote:thats what i thought, thanks guys, settles that discussion i had today!0
-
you didn't miss alot, it moved on quickly to the differances between utterly butterly and i cant belive its not butter, what a day!2010 lapierre spicy 316
2000 cannondale super v 3000 fr sold
1996 speialized rockhopper sold
19?? raliegh discovery
19?? falcon cheetah15 (stolen)
1984ish raliegh burner
19?? raliegh boxer0