Bin Laden's death a 'temporary glitch'
.blitz
Posts: 6,197
We will recover from this, pledge fearmongers
...you and I both know that you're not a Bin Laden because you're just a decent, hard working family trying to make ends meet in a terrifyingly violent world teeming with paedophiles, job losses and the convenience of 24-hour internet shopping. Not like that dodgy fucker next door
Priceless
...you and I both know that you're not a Bin Laden because you're just a decent, hard working family trying to make ends meet in a terrifyingly violent world teeming with paedophiles, job losses and the convenience of 24-hour internet shopping. Not like that dodgy fucker next door
Priceless
0
Comments
-
well i must agree, i dont want to live in a world without a common enemy, id look like a plain racist instead of a prejudiced biggot if i couldnt say
"he looks just like obama, i mean osama, i mean, well, they all look the same to me, lets call the cops, i think his daysack is a bomb"0 -
-
He's been dead for years.
This was just Obama kicking off his re-election bid. The Obama puppet is set to run another term as all US puppets must.
Osama didn't do 911. But if you want to believe that three steel framed skyscrapers can fall at freefall speeds into their own footprint, identically, yet two hit by a plane and one not.. go fir it. Believe what you like. Most people are stupid after all.0 -
-
sheepsteeth wrote:you are an idiot.
properly.
Yeah if you say so.
But you are a member of Bike gay dar.0 -
TickTockTick wrote:sheepsteeth wrote:you are an idiot.
properly.
Yeah if you say so.
But you are a member of Bike gay dar.
http://www.bikeradar.com/forum/profile. ... e&u=527224 :roll:0 -
TickTockTick wrote:He's been dead for years.
This was just Obama kicking off his re-election bid. The Obama puppet is set to run another term as all US puppets must.
Osama didn't do 911. But if you want to believe that three steel framed skyscrapers can fall at freefall speeds into their own footprint, identically, yet two hit by a plane and one not.. go fir it. Believe what you like. Most people are stupid after all.
Well who did, which conspiracy are you going to throw are way then
If I and several thousand members want to blame some dude who has or had intentions to blow up buildings etc then so be it.0 -
TickTockTick wrote:He's been dead for years.
This was just Obama kicking off his re-election bid. The Obama puppet is set to run another term as all US puppets must.
Osama didn't do 911. But if you want to believe that three steel framed skyscrapers can fall at freefall speeds into their own footprint, identically, yet two hit by a plane and one not.. go fir it. Believe what you like. Most people are stupid after all.
LMAO google progressive collapse or indeed check out the Uk and Euro building codes which have contained guidance on preventing progressive collapse since 1967, US did not even consider it till 1999 never became part of their building codes fully till 2003
examples of progressive collapse include the oklahoma Bombing
examples of progressive collapse free fall
Ronan Point Uk 1967
Skyline Towers USA 1973
more improtantly dont recycle internet myths to demonstrate your points
stupid is as stupid does0 -
How can you argue with him with qualifications like this:
"I have a BEng from Brunel, an MEng from Imperial, a PGCE from Surrey, and a MA from Royal College of Art."I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
-
mak3m wrote:LMAO google progressive collapse or indeed check out the Uk and Euro building codes which have contained guidance on preventing progressive collapse since 1967, US did not even consider it till 1999 never became part of their building codes fully till 2003
examples of progressive collapse include the oklahoma Bombing
examples of progressive collapse free fall
Ronan Point Uk 1967
Skyline Towers USA 1973
more improtantly dont recycle internet myths to demonstrate your points
stupid is as stupid does
touche. I wouldn't go stroking yourself silly over NIST's work and claims it's questionable and well questioned, to say the least. and anyone who has watched them from day one smash round pegs into square holes has had a really good laugh watching. Building 7 being particularly hysterical. quick example..
http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/NI ... ookman.pdf
http://www2.ae911truth.org/docs/Seffenrevpub.pdf
but there are infinitely more appropriate places to deal with the facts as they stand surrounding 911 than here because most people simply don't know sh!t from apple butter, or the square root of dick, when it comes down to the subject (for a variety of reasons).
...and in a way, why should or would they. it's not like conclusive proof will ever be arrived at one way or the other. you'll always have three categories of people, those who believe the official version of events hook, line, sinker. your LIHOP camp and your MIHOP camp.0 -
I have precisely zero idea what blister pus just wrote. But it sounds as crazy as, and has that same "foaming at the mouth" intensity as conspiracy nuts.
Maybe he's not insane. mnaybe it's a conspiracy to make us all think he is, guided by the...
Ah, I can't be arsed.0 -
911 Truth - jesus they're even considered nutcases in the states.
All that conspiracy garbage has been refuted a long time ago.
Do you believe in illuminati reptilian alien shape shifters as well?I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
I think you need to get your facts right before spouting bollocks making yourself look a cunt as usual . Architects and engineers for 911 truth are exactly who they say they are, along with scientists from different disciplines who have massive misgivings about the official version of events and have had an ongoing 'discourse' with NIST for a few years - which i dare say you're also clueless about, which is exactly why i came out with the sh!t from apple butter comment0
-
Obviously your screen name reflects the contents of your cranium.
Otherwise, what Yeehaa said.I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
surprise surprise.
..like i said, covered in the original post0 -
You mean to say that...blister pus wrote:surprise surprise.
..like i said, covered in the original post
Is all to do about the "truth" behind 11-9?.blitz wrote:We will recover from this, pledge fearmongers
...you and I both know that you're not a Bin Laden because you're just a decent, hard working family trying to make ends meet in a terrifyingly violent world teeming with paedophiles, job losses and the convenience of 24-hour internet shopping. Not like that dodgy ****** next door
Priceless
Wow, you really are batshit crazy0 -
0 -
so what bought the towers down?
seriously,
lets cut the hippy nonsense and references to websites full of sentences that are incomprehensible let alone half the terms they use.
i think it was them being hit by a pair of great big aircraft.0 -
sheepsteeth wrote:i think it was them being hit by a pair of great big aircraft.
+ a big sack of potatoes
I agree with sheeps, there was bit where those great big planes hit the towers, and then the towers fell down. The other day someone threw a tennis ball at my jenga tower and it fell down.0 -
blister pus
Lol no I don't hold much stock with the Americans or the truth pegs pseudo experts.
I'm a chartered civil engineer, I sat watching that disaster live while my structural colleagues argued how long the towers would stand, whether it was going to stay up was never in question.
If you require I can go through the lack of lateral support in the etc box structure and no latent loading potential in the design if you like.
Turn off google and give your opinion not that of some hopped up yanks
Love n bubbles0 -
mak3m wrote:blister pus
Lol no I don't hold much stock with the Americans or the truth pegs pseudo experts.
I'm a chartered civil engineer, I sat watching that disaster live while my structural colleagues argued how long the towers would stand, whether it was going to stay up was never in question.
If you require I can go through the lack of lateral support in the etc box structure and no latent loading potential in the design if you like.
Turn off google and give your opinion not that of some hopped up yanks
Love n bubbles
Qualified Yanks, though, eh. and some probably more qualified than you - only slightly less arrogant.0 -
sheepsteeth wrote:so what bought the towers down?
I heard Chuck Norris sneezed when he was in Alaska on a Seal clubbing expedition, and the shockwaves brought the towers down.
Meh, I'm not going to argue with that theory.0 -
blister pus wrote:Qualified Yanks, though, eh. and some probably more qualified than you - only slightly less arrogant.
i'm not even sure where to start on this other than Qualified in what exactly, conspiracy theory from MIT? If you seriously believe that a boeing 757 with a maximum take-off weight of 115,680 kg hitting a building wouldn't raise it to the groud you need to question your grasp on physics.
Now i believe, but do not have proof, that buildings in america are required to with stand the effects of earth quakes and in the case of structural failure be able to collapse within a given footprint to minimise the impact on the surrounding buildings (therefore stopping a domino effect)0 -
yeehaamcgee wrote:
That's a great way to refer to fat matesmak3m wrote:my structural colleagues
wait till i get started on bending moments fnarr fnarr0 -
In all seriousness do yourself a favour and do some proper research, not just spout nonsense from a long discredited site.blister pus wrote:Qualified Yanks, though, eh. and some probably more qualified than you - only slightly less arrogant.
There are a few batshit ‘experts’ who maintain the 911 truth line, outnumbered thousands to one by actual experts who have no argument with the official, correct interpretation of what happened.
If you do actually do some research, you will find that most of the ‘experts’ you cite are in fact not qualified in anything to do with construction, engineering, demolition or any related field.
Some have degrees in totally unrelated fields (such as dentistry), some cited ‘experts’ do not have the qualifications they claim, and a number do not actually exist.
There are no on-going talks between 911truth and NIST, and never have been, and there is absolutely no chance at all, ever, never, that there will be in future.
If you would like to continue this discussion in the Hub, where arguments should at least be slightly rational and insult free, feel free.I don't do smileys.
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
London Calling on Facebook
Parktools0 -
kaiser83 wrote:blister pus wrote:Qualified Yanks, though, eh. and some probably more qualified than you - only slightly less arrogant.
i'm not even sure where to start on this other than Qualified in what exactly, conspiracy theory from MIT? If you seriously believe that a boeing 757 with a maximum take-off weight of 115,680 kg hitting a building wouldn't raise it to the groud you need to question your grasp on physics.
Now i believe, but do not have proof, that buildings in america are required to with stand the effects of earth quakes and in the case of structural failure be able to collapse within a given footprint to minimise the impact on the surrounding buildings (therefore stopping a domino effect)
In built arrogance on your part then. no surprise, really. but that aside, If you ain't aware of NIST and aware of the legitimate counter arguments from american professionals (working not just in science and engineering) to the science NIST have put out over the years to support the official position, then you simply aren't aware of the arguments at all. Which is also why I said the subject isn't best served on an off topic bike forum where people don't actually know the square root of dick on the subject in it's entirety, taking into account things like eye witness testimony and political background.0 -
blister pus wrote:square root of d*ck on the subject in it's entirety, taking into account things like eye witness testimony and political background.
IMHO you know the square root of d*ck.
You are not the authority on this and you are qouting from a website and "professionals" that have been discreditted and have qualifications that arent in the subject and as such also know the "square root of d!ck"
at the end of the day you have you're opinion, which you think is valid and the truth, and i have mine, probably best leave it at that eh....0
