is there an advantage of flat pedals over standard

motopatter
motopatter Posts: 179
edited April 2011 in Commuting general
finally my V12's have given up on me and I had to ride home on a spindle with the pedal in my hand :(

I have thrown some old 'standard' mtb pedals I had laying around (after a clean and re-grease). Just wondering if it's worth anything replacing the flatties with same or similar.

I guess I'll be able to make my own mind up within a few rides, but is there any science as to whether any particular clipless pedal would be better than a dissimilar design?
wave your willy here !!!! :)

Comments

  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    flat is normal used to describ a pedal that does not have a clip in system

    such as SPDs SPD-R etc

    normal pedals are "flats".
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • motopatter
    motopatter Posts: 179
    sorry

    I am meaning

    these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/dmr ... s-ec005308

    and these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/mks ... s-ec005312

    difference really is surface area - so more surface area = more grip
    would the larger pedal transfer more power or have any other advantage at all? Is it just urban cool for the kidz?
    wave your willy here !!!! :)
  • EKE_38BPM
    EKE_38BPM Posts: 5,821
    motopatter wrote:
    ...would the larger pedal transfer more power or have any other advantage at all?
    There is only a maximum amount of power to be transferred to the pedals from your legs/feet and that is irrespective of the surface area of the pedals.
    Look at Egg Beaters. The surface area is tiny, but because they are clipped in and the shoes have pretty stiff soles, you don't notice how little of your foot is in contact with the pedal.

    Flat pedals have an advantage of comfort but lose out on grip (especially in wet/muddy conditions)
    The BMX/MTB style flats will give more grip because of the 'spikes' digging into your shoes but are not as comfortable.
    FCN 3: Raleigh Record Ace fixie-to be resurrected sometime in the future
    FCN 4: Planet X Schmaffenschmack 2- workhorse
    FCN 9: B Twin Vitamin - winter commuter/loan bike for trainees

    I'm hungry. I'm always hungry!
  • Headhuunter
    Headhuunter Posts: 6,494
    motopatter wrote:
    sorry

    I am meaning

    these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/dmr ... s-ec005308

    and these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/mks ... s-ec005312

    difference really is surface area - so more surface area = more grip
    would the larger pedal transfer more power or have any other advantage at all? Is it just urban cool for the kidz?

    A larger pedal surface area might make a difference to comfort on long rides but I shouldn't think it would make a difference to power transfer. The one advantage of flats over clipless I suppose is that you aren't going to experience clipless moments (AKA falling over whilst still clipped to the pedal).....
    Do not write below this line. Office use only.
  • MichaelW
    MichaelW Posts: 2,164
    I'm wondering what kind of a failure can render a BMX pedal useless.
    My MKS Sylivian Touring have been used through thick and thin, commuting, on and off road, long distance touring, with never a though to them "going wrong"

    One of the big advantages of a traditional platform pedal over clip-in style (clipless!) pedals is that there is nothing to go wrong and when it does, you can still pedal.

    V12s use a cartridge bearing system, perhaps you should clean or replace the cartridges.
  • snailracer
    snailracer Posts: 968
    ^^
    The V12's are advertised as "MTB" pedals. I don't expect them to be quite as tough as actual BMX pedals, which, amongst other abuses, are deliberately scraped against the ground for certain tricks :shock:
  • snailracer
    snailracer Posts: 968
    motopatter wrote:
    sorry

    I am meaning

    these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/dmr ... s-ec005308

    and these - http://www.evanscycles.com/products/mks ... s-ec005312

    difference really is surface area - so more surface area = more grip
    would the larger pedal transfer more power or have any other advantage at all? Is it just urban cool for the kidz?
    Using the strong/cheap/light rating:

    V12: stronger
    MT Lux: cheaper, lighter

    The efficiency probably depends more on what shoes you prefer to wear, but is negligible in any case.
  • kurako
    kurako Posts: 1,098
    Unless you've got quite firm and/or thick soles the MT Lux will probably be quite uncomfortable. I had similar for a while and they killed my feet when wearing cheapo trainers.
  • motopatter
    motopatter Posts: 179
    MichaelW wrote:
    I'm wondering what kind of a failure can render a BMX pedal useless.

    V12s use a cartridge bearing system, perhaps you should clean or replace the cartridges.

    Embarrassingly :oops: it was a hamfisted (but please read full explanation) attempt at releaving a creak out of the left hand side when pedalling.

    I took off the crank arm and cleaned the mating surfaces (it's the old style square taper bb) and while I was there I thought I'd service the pedals to make sure it wasn't them. (At the end of the day I bought them for the sealed bearings and bombproofness, so shouldn't have bothered as I didn't really suspect the pedal).

    When putting the LH pedal back there was some play (2-3mm) on the spindle so I used more force to try and nip it up. This stripped the thread to a degree which became obvious later. It turns out the aluminum 'cap' that goes on (usually it's just a plastic dust cover) to cover the nut on the spindle pulled the whole lot together.

    I didn't realise I'd stripped the thread at all when putting it back together as there was no loosening - I just did it all up nice and tight and everything was fine and smooth :D . Next commute I immediately felt something not quite right, and it got a bit worse and then I coasted and reached down and the pedal came off in my hand. Fortunately being sealed bearings nothing was lost down the road.

    Anyway when I got home I switched the pedals with some old ones I had laying around (after a re-grease :D ) and then set about fixing the V12's - I thought it may have been the nylon lock nut that had got stripped, but it was a bit of the spindle too, so any new nut offerings just span up after a gentle nip. Best bodge of all - some metal Araldite onto the threads and nipped up, left overnight and jobs a good un 8) Albeit another bad bodge. But realistically these pedals shouldn't go wrong, and I don't believe I really had any need to muck about with them in the first place.

    Creak gone btw :D
    wave your willy here !!!! :)
  • jejv
    jejv Posts: 566
    motopatter wrote:
    is there any science as to whether any particular clipless pedal would be better than a dissimilar design?
    motopatter wrote:
    difference really is surface area - so more surface area = more grip
    would the larger pedal transfer more power or have any other advantage at all?
    If you're pushing on the pedals to stop your feet sliding off, you're wasting your strength.

    To get more power, you want some kind of foot retention device, which doesn't have to be Speedplay - but that would be good.

    Something like SystemEX EM9D, with "strapless toeclips" would do to start with. Should be less than £20 for that lot.

    Main point is, you can unload the pedals on the upstroke without your feet flying off - so you have more torque for less effort at the same rpm, and you can pedal faster without your feet flying off - so more rpm.

    After toeclips, you can go clipless, if you want to, and optimise the position of your foot on the pedal - now into bike setup land.