well, that settles that argument then

welshkev

tiger kills lion in zoo

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12669308

montevideoguy

Was there ever any doubt?

cat_with_no_tail

BBC News wrote:

Six tigers and two lions remain at the zoo.

Bet those 2 Lions are SHlTTING theirselves now!

montevideoguy

Charlie Sheen doesn't talk about "lion blood" does he? Perhaps he isn't as crazy as people believe

blister pus

lucky strike hitting the main line. freak result - and there was no video footage

D-Cyph3r

Montevideoguy wrote:

Was there ever any doubt?

This. Lion's are only good at looking buff while they make the lionesses go do all the hunting, tigers have always been a couple of rungs higher on the predator ladder.

Anonymous

welshkev wrote:

tiger kills lion in zoo

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12669308

FAKE
EVERYONE knows the only place you get lions and tigers are in KENYA, not Turkey. And you can forget Norway

thekickingmule

Free snorkel with every visit!!!

getonyourbike

yeehaamcgee wrote:

welshkev wrote:

tiger kills lion in zoo

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12669308

FAKE
EVERYONE knows the only place you get lions and tigers are in KENYA, not Turkey. And you can forget Norway

Daz555

That Tiger should fight the winner of Grizzly v Polar bear.

I'd pay for that! :shock:

Anonymous

He should fight Bear Grylls.

blister pus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdTdp7Ep6AM

i've just watched grizzly bear vs caribou and caribiou's main problem is they are thick as fuck.

all it had to do was jab the bear in the eyes from distance with it's 12 foot antlers and the bear's wandering about stumbling into things. game over.

seriously thick as fuck.