Please review my riding position

mattrgee
mattrgee Posts: 157
edited February 2011 in MTB general
Link below:

DSC_0729.JPG

Thanks in advance. Any suggestions welcome.

Comments

  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    looks too small for you.
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • ilovedirt
    ilovedirt Posts: 5,798
    Yeah, i was thinking that as well...
    Production Privee Shan

    B'Twin Triban 5
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    Bugger! That's not good then.

    I'm 6'1" (just) frame is just shy of 20" from the bottom bracket to the quick release of the seat post. Is it the overall size of the frame that looks too big or something more specific?

    Ignore the slick on the back wheel btw, been using the turbo during the bad weather.

    Any guidelines for body position etc? Looking at the picture makes me wonder if I am too far forward and whether the saddle is too high?

    Cheers.
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    mattrgee wrote:
    Is it the overall size of the frame that looks too big or something more specific?
    the frame just looks too short to me.

    you could maybe move the saddle back a bit but i have no idea as to the bikes set up. pics without the Giant :wink:
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • whats the top tube length centre to centre?
  • ilovedirt
    ilovedirt Posts: 5,798
    Hmm, frame size sounds about right, i'm about the same height as you and use a similar size of frame. It just looks a little short, have you tried moving your seat back a bit?
    Production Privee Shan

    B'Twin Triban 5
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    Top tube length is: 22.5" (57cm)

    Pic without me:

    DSC_0724.JPG
  • Matt, what do you use the bike for? if it's just for pootling on short journeys, not too much to worry about.

    Longer journeys may cause problems, using it on trails may cause steering and stability problems.

    For general trail riding I think you are not forward enough, you need at the very least, a longer steerer.

    How much seat post length is left in the seat tube?

    do you use those shoes for riding? I would suggest moving your foot back an inch or so, you seem to have the middle of your foot over the middle of the pedal axle. accepted wisdom is to have the ball of you foot over the axle.

    I suspect that a tight turn while pedalling would have you striking your knees on the bar ends.
    --
    Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    mattrgee wrote:
    Top tube length is: 22.5" (57cm)

    Pic without me:

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/20314907/DSC_0724.JPG

    get that seat back by an inch or 2.

    PS use rather than [url][/url]
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • It def looks too small. The saddle is the right height for a proper leg extension but the rest looks wrong. I rode a bike (mostly on road) that was too small for me like this. I found my back got sore from the cramped, bent over position and far too much weight was on the hands. Plus it looks as if you will whack your knee when you turn the bars hard.
  • sheepsteeth
    sheepsteeth Posts: 17,418
    i would tilt the saddle back and move it back so the rails are clamped at the middle,

    i reckon that would be closer to correct then.

    are you comfortable on the bike?
  • I suggest tilting the saddle up to a more level position, getting a longer stem with less rise.

    Difficult to suggest putting the saddle backwards, this adjustment is used to get the best position of the knee in relation to the pedal. Stem length and angle is used to alter reach.

    There are loads or articles out there on best bike fit but I think you need to get your shoulders lower and more forward.

    A good starting position is for your back to be around 45 deg, and you upper arms coming out at 90 deg to you body.
    --
    Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    Matt, what do you use the bike for? if it's just for pootling on short journeys, not too much to worry about.

    Longer journeys may cause problems, using it on trails may cause steering and stability problems.

    For general trail riding I think you are not forward enough, you need at the very least, a longer steerer.

    How much seat post length is left in the seat tube?

    do you use those shoes for riding? I would suggest moving your foot back an inch or so, you seem to have the middle of your foot over the middle of the pedal axle. accepted wisdom is to have the ball of you foot over the axle.

    I suspect that a tight turn while pedalling would have you striking your knees on the bar ends.

    I plan to spend this summer mostly visiting the north wales trail centres: Llandegla, Coed y Brenin and probably Marin at Betws y Coed, so less short journeys and more dedicated days.

    Last year I did feel like I was leaning forward quite a bit to reach the handlebars and my wrists were a little sore after Llandegla, but thought nothing of it at the time. MTFU and all that :)

    Need to sort shoes out this year with something more suitable however.

    Seat post is at max.
  • I would agree with Sheeps bit, slight backward seat tilt and slide it a few inches back on the rails as well, also agree with the balls of your feet over the p axle. take a few hours out to try different degrees for each. I dont feel you need to worry about frame size, i'm 6ft 1 and have a 20 inch frame, and tbh wish i had gone slightly smaller for more ease of chucking it about, although it has benefits on longer rides. look at the stuff the bmx/jump brigade do on thier size frames...... oh, and the gap under your door is too big also...... :P
    Falcon Sierra - 80's
    Muddy Fox Courier - 80's
    GT Palomar 90's
    GT Zaskar LE - 90's
    Cannondale k v 900 90's
    Santa Cruz Bullit - now
    Orange Evo 8 STOLEN 26/09/10
    Orange P7 Pro
    Lots of kites.
  • mattrgee wrote:
    ...

    Seat post is at max.

    with your foot brought back a bit, that will increase the bend in your leg at max extension. Depending on shoes and pedals you may then need to bring the saddle down a bit, if it needs to go up for comfort, you will need a longer seat post. This will then push the saddle back a bit.
    --
    Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    jonnyc2420 wrote:
    I would agree with Sheeps bit, slight backward seat tilt and slide it a few inches back on the rails as well, also agree with the balls of your feet over the p axle. take a few hours out to try different degrees for each. I dont feel you need to worry about frame size, i'm 6ft 1 and have a 20 inch frame, and tbh wish i had gone slightly smaller for more ease of chucking it about, although it has benefits on longer rides. look at the stuff the bmx/jump brigade do on thier size frames...... oh, and the gap under your door is too big also...... :P

    I've called the Joiner, he's on his way... :P

    I've moved the saddle back at least an inch and also levelled it out:

    after.JPG

    The difference is subtle visually, I admit, however I certainly feel less cramped and more stretched out.

    Andrewjoseph: I'll look into a longer stem as you suggest. Thanks
  • sheepsteeth
    sheepsteeth Posts: 17,418
    that looks loads better to me but you wont know till you try a ride.
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    DSC_0729.JPG
    after.JPG

    for easy comparison.
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • I think the saddle could come down half to one inch. but find your own comfort level.
    --
    Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
  • You should also rotate your brake levers down a bit so your wrists are not so bent when you are covering the brakes, this will give you more control over your front wheel and be more comfortable :)
    Specialized Langster
    Specialized Enduro Expert
    Specialized Rockhopper

    This season I will be mainly riding a Specialized
  • Dan_xz
    Dan_xz Posts: 130
    Agree that levers look a bit high, but don't move so much that you can't comfortably reach them when hanging off the back of the saddle.

    The position still looks a bit short to me. How is the steering? If you find it a bit sharp you could put a longer stem on but if the steering is already good then I would say you could do with a longer frame.

    Note that top tube length is not the same for all manufacturers so that doesn't automatically mean you need a bigger size. If you can find a make that has a longer top tube for the same standover then that would be ideal, as standover looks pretty good as it is.

    When you measured to tube did you measure the actual tube or the effective (spirit level straight) length?
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    Dan_xz wrote:
    Agree that levers look a bit high, but don't move so much that you can't comfortably reach them when hanging off the back of the saddle.

    The position still looks a bit short to me. How is the steering? If you find it a bit sharp you could put a longer stem on but if the steering is already good then I would say you could do with a longer frame.

    Note that top tube length is not the same for all manufacturers so that doesn't automatically mean you need a bigger size. If you can find a make that has a longer top tube for the same standover then that would be ideal, as standover looks pretty good as it is.

    When you measured to tube did you measure the actual tube or the effective (spirit level straight) length?

    Yeah, hopefully a longer stem will add the extra reach. Need to avoid starting again with a new frame.

    I measured the actual tube from the centre line of the head tube to the centre line of the seat tube.
  • mattrgee
    mattrgee Posts: 157
    I'm looking at stems in anticipation of pay day next Monday 8)

    My current stem is 100mm with a 10 degree rise. I've seen a 120mm with a 6 degree rise which would extend the reach by 21mm but only increase the height by 1.9mm.

    From looking at the pictures do you think this would be adequate or should I be looking for an even longer stem?

    Thanks.
  • I wouldn't advise going longer than 100mm tbh...
    ::'11 Pitch Pro::
  • jayson
    jayson Posts: 4,606
    I wouldn't advise going longer than 100mm tbh...


    This. 100mm is quite long as it is, i wouldnt go any longer if it was me.
  • Eyon
    Eyon Posts: 623
    I use 110mm on my Anthem and never had an issue with it being too long. I'd look into a seatpost with more layback (though a picture with the cranks at 90deg would help there!) to get more length, lower front end maybe to lower your back if you dont want a longer stem, but of course that will effect the knee over spindle which is important. Seat height looks right on second pic.

    It seems that for your height you have quite a long back + arms, hence the upright position (I am same height and am all leg and no back so end up with massive seapost and a smaller frame), so try to work on getting the distance between contact points a bit larger, thats the onyl thing i can see