Spot the inconsistencies - Olympic Schedule
jzed
Posts: 2,926
Was just reading the following:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympic ... 397378.stm
and got two lines in before thinking WTF
Spot the inconsistencies
1) London Olympics starting two days before it starts; and
2) London Olympics staging football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry; whilst I understand some events venture out of London - come on there are hundreds of football pitches in London
Think the London 2012 committee have spent too much time flying Easyjet and Ryanair.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympic ... 397378.stm
and got two lines in before thinking WTF
The schedule of events for the London 2012 Olympic Games has been released.
The first action will be women's football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry on 25 July, two days before the official opening of the Games.
Spot the inconsistencies
1) London Olympics starting two days before it starts; and
2) London Olympics staging football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry; whilst I understand some events venture out of London - come on there are hundreds of football pitches in London
Think the London 2012 committee have spent too much time flying Easyjet and Ryanair.
0
Comments
-
JZed wrote:Was just reading the following:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympic ... 397378.stm
and got two lines in before thinking WTFThe schedule of events for the London 2012 Olympic Games has been released.
The first action will be women's football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry on 25 July, two days before the official opening of the Games.
Spot the inconsistencies
1) London Olympics starting two days before it starts; and
2) London Olympics staging football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry; whilst I understand some events venture out of London - come on there are hundreds of football pitches in London
Think the London 2012 committee have spent too much time flying Easyjet and Ryanair.
Slight inconsistency in your theory. It does not start 2 days before it starts. It is 2 days before the official opening ceremony. As to the football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry, why not, other area's of the country will be paying for it."Encyclopaedia is a fetish for very small bicycles"0 -
It's the same at every Olympics. Some events simply can't be completed within one city or the official length of the games.Mud - Genesis Vapour CCX
Race - Fuji Norcom Straight
Sun - Cervelo R3
Winter / Commute - Dolan ADX0 -
Perhaps the fact Great Britain arn't competing in the football may be the reason to outsource the football from London... Disguising it as a less London-centric games..0
-
JZed wrote:2) London Olympics staging football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry; whilst I understand some events venture out of London - come on there are hundreds of football pitches in London
+1 To justify the cost to the rest of the Country. Before anyone starts, no we won't benefit. Any added income from the event will be swallowed up by the cost.
+1 to the fact that it is nuts though. Didn't expect anything more :evil:None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
Anyone else think they should get Andy Gray and thingy Keys to commentate on the womens 'football' matches? :twisted:0
-
-
-
Asprilla wrote:It's the same at every Olympics. Some events simply can't be completed within one city or the official length of the games.
No, it's to throw a few scrapes out to the regions. London has plenty of football grounds and Scotland certainly wouldn't be on the list if logistics was a genuine reason.
Its the same as all the guff about legacy. Adds more costs to keep the facade going, but the fees paid to non-jobs make it worthwhile to them. Even the London boroughs that threw in local tax payers money (on top of the surcharge each home pays) have found they've not got the deal they thought.0 -
davmaggs wrote:Asprilla wrote:It's the same at every Olympics. Some events simply can't be completed within one city or the official length of the games.
No, it's to throw a few scrapes out to the regions. London has plenty of football grounds and Scotland certainly wouldn't be on the list if logistics was a genuine reason.
Its the same as all the guff about legacy. Adds more costs to keep the facade going, but the fees paid to non-jobs make it worthwhile to them. Even the London boroughs that threw in local tax payers money (on top of the surcharge each home pays) have found they've not got the deal they thought.
Oh, look: exactly the same set up for the Beijing games in 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_a ... ics#Venues
And, suprise, the same for Athens in 2004
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_a ... r_Olympics
And 2000 in Sydney:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_a ... r_OlympicsMud - Genesis Vapour CCX
Race - Fuji Norcom Straight
Sun - Cervelo R3
Winter / Commute - Dolan ADX0 -
Greg66 wrote:Just had a look at the prices.
Wowser.
Initially I thought they were in line with what I was expecting; 40 quid for the cycling. Not bad, considering the event.
Then I saw the length of the sessions; some are just 90 minutes long!
I went to the one of the world track events in Manchester last year, and I'm sure I paid 45 quid for the three full days.
I'm going to have to think seriously about which tickets to apply for...0 -
rml380z wrote:Greg66 wrote:Just had a look at the prices.
Wowser.
Initially I thought they were in line with what I was expecting; 40 quid for the cycling. Not bad, considering the event.
Then I saw the length of the sessions; some are just 90 minutes long!
I went to the one of the world track events in Manchester last year, and I'm sure I paid 45 quid for the three full days.
I'm going to have to think seriously about which tickets to apply for...
It's pretty much a once in a lifetime experience when it's the olympics.
Track events at Manchester aren't.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:rml380z wrote:Greg66 wrote:Just had a look at the prices.
Wowser.
Initially I thought they were in line with what I was expecting; 40 quid for the cycling. Not bad, considering the event.
Then I saw the length of the sessions; some are just 90 minutes long!
I went to the one of the world track events in Manchester last year, and I'm sure I paid 45 quid for the three full days.
I'm going to have to think seriously about which tickets to apply for...
It's pretty much a once in a lifetime experience when it's the olympics.
Track events at Manchester aren't.
Yes. Sort of. I know someone who went to The LA games and someone who wen to the Sydney games to spectate. And we went to the Vancouver games. But I take your point that that is probably exceptional.
Cat A tickets for most things look to be c £90. At the Vancouver 2010 Games, I was able to get tickets for 8 events for £450pp. I will put in for some London tickets, but I think I'll be choosing quite carefully. It gets a bit steep when the 66 family of 4 is being bankrolled.0 -
Wallace1492 wrote:As to the football in Cardiff, Glasgow and Coventry, why not, other area's of the country will be paying for it.
And exactly how much "legacy" benefit will the rest of the country get after contributing to the 16 billion required to fund it?
The square root of bugg*r all, I would venture....... :x
....and don't get me started on ticket pricing......
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/oth ... -1.1085388"Get a bicycle. You won't regret it if you live"
Mark Twain0 -
Does anyone else think its a bit of pot and kettle for the "regions" to complain about London being subsidised? :twisted:You'll not see nothing like the mighty Quin.0
-
Bikequin wrote:Does anyone else think its a bit of pot and kettle for the "regions" to complain about London being subsidised? :twisted:
You could. But it is not London that is being subsidised, just a vanity parade for the few.None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
daviesee wrote:Bikequin wrote:Does anyone else think its a bit of pot and kettle for the "regions" to complain about London being subsidised? :twisted:
You could. But it is not London that is being subsidised, just a vanity parade for the few.
BTW we're not a "region" we're a "country" - and don't even think about mentioning the Barnet formula or I shall be forced to paint my face blue, wear a kilt and gallop down to to Sassenachville crying "You may take our land, cobber, but you will never take our freedom" in an appalling Australian/Scottish accent.........."Get a bicycle. You won't regret it if you live"
Mark Twain0 -
Blacktemplar wrote:daviesee wrote:Bikequin wrote:Does anyone else think its a bit of pot and kettle for the "regions" to complain about London being subsidised? :twisted:
You could. But it is not London that is being subsidised, just a vanity parade for the few.
C'mon people its The Olympics! How about not being cynical for a change :P0 -
JZed wrote:Was just reading the following:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympic ... 397378.stm
and got two lines in before thinking WTF
Spot the inconsistencies
Swimming 34 Gold medals (44 inc diving & synchronised swimming)
Cycling 18 Gold medals (that's including road, track, mountain & bmx)
Swimming 2 entrants per country per event
Cycling 1 entrant per country per event
As we know cycling events keep being removed/merged to provide 'variety' to the programme. Perhaps cycling should introduce 'left leg only' cycling or hand powered bikes to be able to compete with the variety offered by swimmers doing the same distance but with less efficient strokes.0 -
tarquin_foxglove wrote:... with the variety offered by swimmers doing the same distance but with less efficient strokes.
The swimming programme in full...
50 metre freestyle
100 metre backstroke
100 metre breaststroke
100 metre butterfly
100 metre freestyle
200 metre backstroke
200 metre breaststroke
200 metre butterfly
200 metre freestyle
200 metre individual medley
400 metre freestyle
400 metre individual medley
1500 metre freestyle
Marathon 10 km
4 × 100 metre freestyle relay
4 × 100 metre medley relay
4 × 200 metre freestyle relay0